Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
- Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples
Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples
Published on August 23, 2019 by Amy Luo . Revised on June 22, 2023.
Critical discourse analysis (or discourse analysis) is a research method for studying written or spoken language in relation to its social context. It aims to understand how language is used in real life situations.
When you conduct discourse analysis, you might focus on:
- The purposes and effects of different types of language
- Cultural rules and conventions in communication
- How values, beliefs and assumptions are communicated
- How language use relates to its social, political and historical context
Discourse analysis is a common qualitative research method in many humanities and social science disciplines, including linguistics, sociology, anthropology, psychology and cultural studies.
Table of contents
What is discourse analysis used for, how is discourse analysis different from other methods, how to conduct discourse analysis, other interesting articles.
Conducting discourse analysis means examining how language functions and how meaning is created in different social contexts. It can be applied to any instance of written or oral language, as well as non-verbal aspects of communication such as tone and gestures.
Materials that are suitable for discourse analysis include:
- Books, newspapers and periodicals
- Marketing material, such as brochures and advertisements
- Business and government documents
- Websites, forums, social media posts and comments
- Interviews and conversations
By analyzing these types of discourse, researchers aim to gain an understanding of social groups and how they communicate.
Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services
Discover proofreading & editing
Unlike linguistic approaches that focus only on the rules of language use, discourse analysis emphasizes the contextual meaning of language.
It focuses on the social aspects of communication and the ways people use language to achieve specific effects (e.g. to build trust, to create doubt, to evoke emotions, or to manage conflict).
Instead of focusing on smaller units of language, such as sounds, words or phrases, discourse analysis is used to study larger chunks of language, such as entire conversations, texts, or collections of texts. The selected sources can be analyzed on multiple levels.
| Level of communication | What is analyzed? |
|---|---|
| Vocabulary | Words and phrases can be analyzed for ideological associations, formality, and euphemistic and metaphorical content. |
| Grammar | The way that sentences are constructed (e.g., , active or passive construction, and the use of imperatives and questions) can reveal aspects of intended meaning. |
| Structure | The structure of a text can be analyzed for how it creates emphasis or builds a narrative. |
| Genre | Texts can be analyzed in relation to the conventions and communicative aims of their genre (e.g., political speeches or tabloid newspaper articles). |
| Non-verbal communication | Non-verbal aspects of speech, such as tone of voice, pauses, gestures, and sounds like “um”, can reveal aspects of a speaker’s intentions, attitudes, and emotions. |
| Conversational codes | The interaction between people in a conversation, such as turn-taking, interruptions and listener response, can reveal aspects of cultural conventions and social roles. |
Discourse analysis is a qualitative and interpretive method of analyzing texts (in contrast to more systematic methods like content analysis ). You make interpretations based on both the details of the material itself and on contextual knowledge.
There are many different approaches and techniques you can use to conduct discourse analysis, but the steps below outline the basic structure you need to follow. Following these steps can help you avoid pitfalls of confirmation bias that can cloud your analysis.
Step 1: Define the research question and select the content of analysis
To do discourse analysis, you begin with a clearly defined research question . Once you have developed your question, select a range of material that is appropriate to answer it.
Discourse analysis is a method that can be applied both to large volumes of material and to smaller samples, depending on the aims and timescale of your research.
Step 2: Gather information and theory on the context
Next, you must establish the social and historical context in which the material was produced and intended to be received. Gather factual details of when and where the content was created, who the author is, who published it, and whom it was disseminated to.
As well as understanding the real-life context of the discourse, you can also conduct a literature review on the topic and construct a theoretical framework to guide your analysis.
Step 3: Analyze the content for themes and patterns
This step involves closely examining various elements of the material – such as words, sentences, paragraphs, and overall structure – and relating them to attributes, themes, and patterns relevant to your research question.
Step 4: Review your results and draw conclusions
Once you have assigned particular attributes to elements of the material, reflect on your results to examine the function and meaning of the language used. Here, you will consider your analysis in relation to the broader context that you established earlier to draw conclusions that answer your research question.
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Normal distribution
- Measures of central tendency
- Chi square tests
- Confidence interval
- Quartiles & Quantiles
- Cluster sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Thematic analysis
- Cohort study
- Peer review
- Ethnography
Research bias
- Implicit bias
- Cognitive bias
- Conformity bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Availability heuristic
- Attrition bias
- Social desirability bias
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Luo, A. (2023, June 22). Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 18, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/discourse-analysis/
Is this article helpful?
Other students also liked
What is qualitative research | methods & examples, what is a case study | definition, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
- Bibliography
- More Referencing guides Blog Automated transliteration Relevant bibliographies by topics
- Automated transliteration
- Relevant bibliographies by topics
- Referencing guides
Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method
- First Online: 16 October 2019
Cite this chapter
- Ruth Sanz Sabido 2
1900 Accesses
3 Citations
This chapter explains the tenets of Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) as a theoretical and methodological framework. It introduces the notion of the ‘postcolonial’ and ‘Orientalism’, before providing a review of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and the connections between language and social structures of power. It then focuses on the ways in which both Postcolonial Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis share an interest in resisting social structures that are based on unequal relations of power. This theoretical framework is complemented by a methodological approach, which is based on an adaptation of historical approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, which also includes quantitative Content Analysis. Finally, it explains the sampling criteria and the process of data collection and analysis for this research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Durable hardcover edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Abell, J., & Myers, G. (2008). Analysing research interviews. In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1977). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. In J. Curran, et al. (Eds.), Mass Communication and Society . London: Arnold.
Allen, R., & Frost, J. (1981). Daily Mirror . Cambridge: Patrick Stephens.
Anania, F. (2010). La metodología de la investigación histórica y los medios de comunicación. In J. C. Ibáñez & F. Anania (Eds.), Memoria Histórica e Identidad en Cine y Televisión (pp. 17–37). Zamora: Comunicación Social.
Ayerst, D. (1971). Guardian: Biography of a Newspaper . London: Collins.
Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bhabha, H. K. (1985). Signs taken for wonders. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 38–43). London: Routledge.
Blanton, R., et al. (2001). Colonial style and post-colonial ethnic conflict in Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 473–491.
Article Google Scholar
Brunt, R., & Cere, R. (Eds.). (2011). Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain . Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carroll, C., & King, P. (Eds.). (2003). Ireland and Postcolonial Theory . Cork: Cork University Press.
Carvalho, A. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society: Rethinking the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis. Journalism Studies, 9 (2), 161–177.
Cere, R. (2011). Postcolonial and media studies: A cognitive map. In R. Brunt & R. Cere (Eds.), Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain (pp. 1–13). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chippindale, P., & Horrie, C. (1999). Stick It Up Your Punter! The Uncut Story of the Sun Newspaper . London: Simon & Schuster.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Couldry, N. (2008). Media discourse and the naturalisation of categories. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere (pp. 67–88). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Deacon, D., et al. (1999). Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis . London: Arnold.
Downing, D. (2004). Africa: Postcolonial Conflict . Oxford: Heinemann.
Eagleton, T. (1998). Postcolonialism: The case of Ireland. In D. Bennett (Ed.), Multicultural States: Rethinking Difference and Identity . London: Routledge.
Edelman, M. (1966). The Mirror: A Political History . London: Hamish Hamilton.
Escandell Vidal, M. V. (2009). El significado. In M. V. Escandell Vidal, et al. (Eds.), El lenguaje humano . Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power . London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse . London: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (2009a). A Dialectical-Relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 162–186). London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (2009b). Language, reality and power. In J. Culpeper, et al. (Eds.), English Language: Description, Variation and Context (pp. 512–522). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fowler, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler, et al. (Eds.), Language and Control (pp. 185–213). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time . New York: Pantheon Books.
Ghandour, Z. B. (2010). A Discourse on Domination in Mandate Palestine: Imperialism, Property and Insurgency . Abingdon: Routledge.
Goldsworthy, D. (1971). Colonial Issues in British Politics 1945–1962: From ‘Colonial Development’ to ‘Wind of Change’ . London: Oxford University Press.
Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices . London: Sage.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language . London: Edward Arnold.
Hansen, A. (Ed.). (2008). Mass Communication Research Methods . London: Sage.
Harper, G. (Ed.). (2001). Colonial and Post-colonial Incarceration . London: Continuum.
Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as Ideology . London: Routledge.
Hooper, G., & Graham, C. (Eds.). (2002). Irish and Postcolonial Writing: History, Theory, Practice . Hampshire: Palgrave.
Hyatt, D. (2005). Time for a change: A Critical Discoursal Analysis of synchronic context with diachronic relevance. Discourse & Society, 16 (4), 543–560.
Kabir, A. J. (2009). Territory of Desire: Representing the Valley of Kashmir . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Book Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology . London: Sage.
Krishna, S. (2009). Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-first Century . Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
Krupat, A. (1996). Postcolonialism, ideology, and Native American literature. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 176–179). London: Routledge.
Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2008). Language, communication and the public sphere: A perspective from Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere (pp. 89–110). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Loomba, A. (1998). Colonialism/Postcolonialism . London: Routledge.
Macdonald, M. (2011). Discourses of separation: News and documentary representations of Muslims in Britain. In R. Brunt & R. Cere (Eds.), Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain (pp. 127–141). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chapter Google Scholar
Magdoff, H. (1978). Imperialism: From the Colonial Age to the Present Essays . New York: Monthly Review Press.
Manning, P. (2001). News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction . London: Sage.
Martin, G. (2010). Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues . London: Sage.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause . London: Continuum.
Matar, D. (2011). What It Means to Be Palestinian: Stories of Palestinian Peoplehood . London: I.B. Tauris.
Memmi, A. (2003). The Colonizer and the Colonized . London: Earthscan.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook . London: Sage.
Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing Discourse Analysis . London: Penguin.
Oberhuber, F., & Krzyzanowski, M. (2008). Discourse analysis and ethnography. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in Social Sciences (pp. 182–203). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Prakash, G. (1995). After colonialism. In G. Prakash (Ed.), After Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacements . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 87–121). London: Sage.
Riffe, D., et al. (2005). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research . London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sardar, Z. (1999). Orientalism . Buckingham: Open University Press.
Schrøder, K. C. (2012). Discursive realities. In K. B. Jensen (Ed.), A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies (pp. 106–130). Abingdon: Routledge.
Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice . London: Routledge.
Shindler, C. (2004). Reading The Guardian : Jews, Israel-Palestine and the origins of irritation. In T. Parfitt & Y. Egorova (Eds.), Jews, Muslims and Mass Media: Mediating the ‘Other’ (pp. 157–177). London: Routledge.
Smith, A. (2000). The fall and fall of the third Daily Herald , 1930–1964. In P. Catterall, C. Seymour-Ure, & A. Smith (Eds.), Northcliffe’s Legacy: Aspects of the British Popular Press, 1896–1996 . Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing Social Problems . New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Stewart, G. (2005). The History of The Times . London: HarperCollins.
Taylor, G. (1993). Changing Faces: A History of the Guardian, 1956–88 . London: Fourth Estate.
Thiong’o, N. W. (1981). The language of African literature. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 263–265). London: Routledge.
Tiffin, H. (1987). Post-colonial literatures and counter-discourse. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 99–101). London: Routledge.
Toolan, M. (1997). What is Critical Discourse Analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it? Language and Literature, 6 (2), 83–103.
Trew, T. (1979). Theory and ideology at work. In R. Fowler, et al. (Eds.), Language and Control (pp. 94–116). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Tyrwhitt-Drake, H. (1999). Resisting the discourse of Critical Discourse Analysis: Reopening a Hong Kong case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1081–1088.
van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4 (2), 249–283.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis . London: Sage.
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 1–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Widdowson, H. G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4 (3), 157–172.
Wodak, R. (Ed.). (1989). Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R. (2009). Language and politics. In J. Culpeper, et al. (Eds.), English Language: Description, Variation and Context (pp. 576–593). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis . London: Sage.
Young, R. (2001). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction . Oxford: Blackwell.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
Ruth Sanz Sabido
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Ruth Sanz Sabido .
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Sanz Sabido, R. (2019). Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. In: The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in the British Press. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52646-5_2
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52646-5_2
Published : 16 October 2019
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN : 978-1-137-52645-8
Online ISBN : 978-1-137-52646-5
eBook Packages : Literature, Cultural and Media Studies Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
COMMENTS
A critical discourse analysis of student and staff constructions of their pedagogical relationships in two UK modern universities in an era of marketisation Diane Garside BA, MA Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Philosophy of Education (PhD) Institute of Education (IOE) University College London (UCL) April 2020
Critical discourse analysis (or discourse analysis) is a research method for studying written or spoken language in relation to its social context. It aims to understand how language is used in real life situations. When you conduct discourse analysis, you might focus on: The purposes and effects of different types of language.
Critical discourse analysis is an inter- and transdisciplinary methodology that aims to expose how power relations operate. Importantly, this analytic approach can not only be used to identify social injustice but also as a framework for understanding how these injustices came to be and how they are being/can be challenged. Critical discourse ...
Van Dijk (forthcoming) summarizes the history of Discourse Studies (DS) in a very. precise way, and emphasizes that 'the "core" of the new discipline remains the systematic. and explicit ...
Finally, a critical discourse analysis is done for two reasons. First, to find the positions that nations take on inequality in the discourse since the establishment of the SDGs. Second, to interpret these positions in the context of the findings ... starting point for my Master thesis to which I have eagerly dedicated myself the past year. I
Critical discourse analysis (CDA) stresses that language use, discourse, and communication should be studied in their social, cultural and political contexts. A considerable amount of literature ...
Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a rapidly developing area of language study. It regards discourse as 'a form as social practice' (Fairclough & Wodak, 1997, p.258), and takes consideration of the context of language use to be crucial to discourse (Wodak, 2001). It takes particular interest in the relation between language and power.
Critical Discourse Analysis (hereafter CDA) is a cross-discipline set forth in the early 1990s by a group of scholars such as Theo van Leeuwen, Gunther Kress, Teun van Dijk, and Norman Fairclough (Wodak & Meyer, 2001). At that time, theories and methods of CDA have been formulated to differentiate this paradigm from other theories and ...
critical. analysis of text and talk. In general, the answers to such questions presuppose a study of the relations between discourse, power, dominance, social inequality and the position of the discourse analyst in such social relationships. Since this is a complex, multidisciplinary and as vet underdeveloped domain of study, which one may call.
language. Most o f these sources can be interpreted and analysed using Critical D iscourse Analysis. (CDA), an approach that indicates other modes of meaning making including gestures, intonation ...
Critical discourse analysis, or CDA, is a method of inquiry focused on studying. language and discourse's influences on power and social structures and practices (Wodak, 2001). CDA narrows its focus on issues of power, dominance, and inequality.
the method of analysis used as well as the limitations of the study. Finally, it offers operational definitions and an overview of the thesis. Critical Discourse Analysis as a Linguistic Research Tool Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) has become prominent and influential over recent years.
Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a type of discourse analytical. research that prim- arily studies the way social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the. social and political context (Dijk: 139) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is ̳a theory and method.
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Social Change in Women-related Posts on Saudi English-Language Blogs Posted between 2009 and 2012 Shrouq Hamad Al Maghlouth A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University United Kingdom
A Critical Discourse Analysis of How Women in Top Business and Leadership Roles Were Represented Within The Times and The New York Times During March 2013. LUBS3305: DISSERTATION IN MANAGEMENT May, 2014 Word Count: 6,000 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: BSc (Hons) Management
This thesis uses critical discourse analysis to study the discursive construction of EU counter-terrorism policy. It uses representative extracts from twenty counter-terrorism documents prepared by/or for the EU institution the European Council, across a ten-year period from November 1999 to December 2009.
Abstract. This chapter explains the tenets of Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) as a theoretical and methodological framework. It introduces the notion of the 'postcolonial' and 'Orientalism', before providing a review of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and the connections between language and social structures of power.
online and offline mediums. In this manner, discourse is a form of social practice that uses language to produce knowledge and subjectivity (Hall, 1997). I will use Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to challenge claims made by the media, as outlined above, in its coverage of Sen. Sanders and Mr. Trump throughout the primary process.
Master's dissertation Critical Discourse Analysis: Media Representation of the Refugee deals with the issue of distorting the reality of refugees through media coverage during the time of the ...
This is to certify that the Sarjana thesis of Achmad Komaruddin, entitled. "A Critical Discourse Analysis on Meaning Levels of Hillary Diane Rodham. Clinton. Speech about Women" has been approved by the board of examiners as. one of the requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra (S.S) in English. artment, Faculty of Humanities at Maulana.
t resorted to corpora as a tool for discourse analysis in the political field. Ultimately, Chapter 3 offers an overview of the life of Ursula von der Leyen and her path to the European Presidency and describes the analysis of the 173 speeches composing the corpus by identifying the features of s.
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is an important analytical method or framework which draws its attitude to criticism from its immediate antecedents, Critical Applied Linguistics, and Systemic Functional Linguistics, both of which recognize the role of language in the production and maintenance of unequal power structures Lin, (2013).