*instead maybe: an alternative approach to contain a
problem with resistant bacteria that does not require
ongoing antimicrobial stewardship was developed which resulted in a sustained change in the consumption of antimicrobials and a decreasing rate of ESBL-KP
Due to heterogeneity of the study types selected, appraisal of methodological and reporting quality of the included studies and overall body of evidence was carried out using the revised version of the Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies tool (QuADS), which has demonstrated reliability and validity. 25 , 26 This tool awarded the score of 0–3 where 0 is the minimum score and 3 is the highest score against each of the 13 criterion. 26 Interrater reliability between two reviewers (RH, AC) revealed substantial agreement in the quality appraisal (k = 0.68). 27 , 28
After duplicates were removed, 2012 papers were extracted from Endnote into Covidence. After title and abstract screening, 285 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria and copies of full texts were obtained. Full-text screening led to a total of 38 papers included in the review. Figure 1 demonstrates the screening and selection process.
Flow chart of the study search and selection process.
The most common reasons for excluding papers at full-text review were because they did not discuss a formal change management method explicitly (144), were not in a healthcare setting, 16 were commentary, protocol or editorial pieces, 11 or were not in health service delivery. 6 Many studies alluded to common concepts or techniques identified in change management methodologies but were excluded if no explicit model or framework was utilised. The distinct and expansive literature employing the Model for Improvement as a methodology was excluded because, whilst the model intersects with change management methodologies, the focus is determining the nature of changes and adaptations to introduce through incremental introduction and analysis of changes rather than the process of managing the change. This body of work was therefore beyond the scope of the present review.
A total of 38 articles emerged; 35 were from OECD countries including the United States of America (18 studies), Canada (5 studies), Australia (4 studies), the United Kingdom (4 studies), Denmark (1 study), Ireland (1 study), Singapore (1 study) and Sweden (1 study). Two articles emerged from non-OECD countries: Nepal (1 study) and Uganda (1 study); and one study did not specify the country. Most studies were conducted in hospital settings (29 studies), with more than half of these at a department or unit level (17 studies). Other settings included regional level health organisations health centres or clinics, education centres, community health settings and one in a residential aged care facility. Most studies only involved a single institution, 28 seven studies involved in between 2 and 9 institutions, and three studies involved more than ten institutions with the largest number being 25 institutes.
The impetus for change for the majority of studies came from within the organisation (34 studies). Of these, changes in 17 studies were part of quality improvement programs/projects, 13 were due to changes required as a result of changes in organisational policies or demands and four were as part of the implementation of an organisational strategy. In two further studies, change was due to a directive from the state or national health department. In the final two studies, both conducted in non-OECD countries, the impetus for change was from healthcare professional associations.
The included studies varied widely in their scores using the QUADS criteria. Most studies performed strongly in reporting their theoretical and conceptual underpinning, and in reporting of research aims and the involvement of stakeholders in the process of change. Many studies were case examples of change models and presented in a non-traditional research format. This limited their suitability for quality appraisal regarding the reporting of recruitment methods, data collection and data analyses. Studies often performed poorly on reporting of sampling to address research aims, description of data collection procedure, recruitment and critical discussion of strength and limitations of the study. The findings of the quality appraisal may be indicative of the nature of the publications identified but highlight a lack of transparency regarding the quality of the research design and methods used to gather the data, which must be acknowledged in interpreting the review findings.
Change management models utilised.
Thirty-eight of the identified articles described applications of change management models predominantly applied from the discipline of management into healthcare. Most of the studies utilised either Kotter’s 8-Step Model (19 studies) or Lewin’s 3-Stage Model of Change (11 studies). Eighteen studies utilised the Kotter 8-Step Model for managing change, with one further study that integrated the Kotter model with Silversin and Kornacki’s model. 29–47 Eight studies referenced their application of the Lewin 3-Stage Model of Change into a healthcare setting, 48–55 with three further studies that integrated the Lewin model with a concern-based change management approach, McKinsey 7S Model of Change, and Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory, respectively. 56–58 A further eight articles reported the use of six further models for managing and leading change: Influencer Change Model (1 study); 59 Prosci ADKAR (1 study); 60 Accelerated Implementation Methodology (AIM) (2 studies); 61 , 62 Advent Health Clinical Transformation Model (1 study); 63 Riches 4 stage model (1 study); 64 Youngs Nine Stage Framework (1 study), 65 and the CAP model (1 study). 66
Applications of the Kotter model were primarily identified in nurse-led, local level, single unit or site quality improvement projects. 29 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 67 One US and one UK study applied the model to the full project lifecycle in emergency departments to increase the number of risk assessments undertaken by nurses for falls and to enhance the triage system, respectively. 29 , 45 Both projects reported success in creating change, with a significant increase in fall assessments reported following the project 45 and the adoption of the triage system into routine practice. 29 Two further US-based projects utilised the model to bring about change to bedside handoffs in an intensive care unit and a surgical orthopaedic trauma unit, noting significant improvements reported by the nurses on those units following project completion. 43 , 47 Young’s Nine Stage Framework was also used in a nurse-led local-level quality improvement project in an acute paediatric setting to introduce a competency assessment tool. 65 The authors described in detail the models, issues and actions arising through the stages of pre-change, stimulus, consideration, validate need, preparation, commit, do-check-act, results and into the new normal. 65 The application of the model enabled a considered change process which analysed organisational and systems influences impacting the change proposed, leading to full uptake of the assessment tool at 18–24 months. 65
The Kotter model was also applied in a quality improvement program in head and neck surgery in a Canadian surgical department, with authors concluding the model provided a guiding principle to support the change process. 36 In a further leadership-focused change program, the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program (CUSP) model within the Division of General Surgery applied the Kotter 8-step and five principles of dual-operating systems to the development and implementation of surgical quality improvement initiatives. 35 A guiding coalition of leaders that included staff and resident surgeons, nursing leaders, allied health and hospital administrators was brought together to tackle two key quality issues identified around surgical site infection (SSI) by front-line staff of wound care and poor team communication. 35 This ongoing structure to identify and address quality issues was supported by reporting of improvement data and regular meeting to build a quality improvement culture, yet data to determine the success of this initiative was not provided. 35 Reduction in SSI’s was the focus of a change project in a UK NHS Trust breast surgery team that engaged the Kotter 8-step principles, with each step operationalised in the Trust, demonstrating reduced SSI’s in the first quarter of the project implementation year from 7%-3.1% of inpatients and readmission rates from 2.2% to 0% in this period. 33 This trend continued into the second quarter, with the need to maintain momentum and embed this change identified as critical to ongoing success. 33
Lewin’s Model of Change was similarly applied in two nurse-led change projects to enhance bedside handover in four Australian hospitals across multiple wards. 50 , 51 The application of the model was as a way to describe the process of change rather than to guide the activities to be undertaken during the change effort, with model descriptively aligned by the authors to reflect the periods of data collection at baseline (unfreezing stage), changes being made to the handover process and policies and the post-intervention data collection regarding the handover process (refreezing). 50 , 51 In a further nurse-led change project regarding the implementation of an electronic patient caseload tool in a community setting, Lewin’s Model was employed as a structured change process through a series of steps, yet the primary stages reported were unfreezing and moving. 49 A key benefit of the application of this model was the focus it provided to the nurse leader to actively contemplate the change process and its progression. 49 Lewin’s Model was also drawn upon to frame the steps taken in implementing and evaluating a bedside reporting intervention in the US that sought to enhance nursing communication. 54 As such, patient satisfaction with nursing communication increased from 75% to 87.6% over a six-month period. 54
One physician-led study focused on bringing about change in the management of chest pain in a US emergency department using their locally developed AdventHealth Clinical Transformation method. 63 This approach integrates common components of major change management models in the period of designing and planning for change, with piloting, implementation and sustainment periods. A key value of taking this planned approach was the ability to maintain clinician engagement in the project and achieving outcomes at a timed accountable follow-up. 63 A multidisciplinary team reported the use of the Influencer Change Model, which seeks to address both motivation and ability across personal, social and structural levels, to enhance appropriate use of urinary catheters in a hospital in Canada. 59 This behaviourally focused approach was combined with PDSA cycles and led to a significant reduction in inappropriate catheter use. 59 A key factor identified by the authors in the success of the approach was the multi-modal change techniques to address more than just informational needs.
Twelve institutional-level projects were identified. 30 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 46 , 48 , 52 , 56 , 58 , 68 , 69 The first was a hospital-wide multi-faceted intervention to reduce in-hospital transmission of antimicrobial resistance in Denmark, which recorded immediate and sustained change in antimicrobial consumption and the rate of Bacteria-producing extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL-KP) resulting from a project guided by Kotter from inception to completion. 30 The second hospital-wide project emerged from Singapore and aimed to enhance timely access to outpatient specialist care requested by the emergency department. 41 Utilising a change management process guided by the Kotter steps, the organisation realised the benefits of the change project in improving the proportion of specialist outpatient appointments given within the timeframe requested from 51.7% to 80.8%, early discharge from 11.9% to being sustained at 27.2%, and clinician compliance rates in performing the changes required of between 84% and 100%. 41 In the third hospital-level project, a project to achieve a baby-friendly hospital in relation to breast-feeding utilised the Kotter 8-steps to bring together a Breastfeeding Task Force and transform the hospital. 38 A pre- and post-project survey indicated that the change goals were realised over a 12-month period. 38 In the Kent and Medway NHS Trust, recovery clinics were implemented by nurses using Kotter’s model to enable greater user engagement in their care and enhance nursing care opportunities by protecting their time. 40 After three months of the project, administrative organisational data indicated evidence of enhanced user involvement in the service. 40
Stoller et al reported a teamwork enhancement intervention across four respiratory departments of a US hospital to implement and optimise utilisation of the Respiratory Therapy Consult Service (RTCS). The project was underpinned by organisational and individual change theories integrating Kotter's 8-step model with Silversin and Kornacki’s Amicus Model, and the Intentional Change Theory of Boyatzis. 46 The use of the RTCS significantly enhanced the allocation of respiratory therapy services in the hospital and has been embedded in institutional practice. 46 In a community-based palliative organisation in Australia, the term emergency medication was replaced with anticipatory medication over several years. 37 The Kotter model was applied to support the change process, primarily in building momentum around the perceived need for change and a guiding coalition to facilitate buy-in and direct to the change process. 37 The application of the latter components of the model, particularly with regard to how change was embedded, was not reported. 37
In a paediatric trauma centre, Lewin’s Model was utilised to guide a change process in which a collaborative care model led by surgical services with medical service consultation was introduced to manage trauma patients reducing the need for non-surgical admissions across the institution. 48 The project achieved a reduction in non-surgical trauma admissions from 30% to 3% of admissions over a three-and-a-half-year project period. 48 The model was applied closely to guide the change activities within this project, with a range of activities at each stage seeking to set the basis for change and its embedding in practice. 48 Lewin was also used in geriatric care settings to embed a new approach to the management of chronic conditions. However, the application of the model in this context was primarily focused on the moving stage, with few activities that appeared to address the first and third stages of the model and limited data reported of the outcomes of this change project. 52
Combining the Lewin Model with Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Tetef et al, implemented the new technology of a bronchial thermoplasty program. 58 Lewin’s Model was used to couch all of the change activities. It was notable that unfreezing activities identified the development of new policies and procedures, with the overall project primarily focused on bringing in the new technology and the moving stage. 58 Data of the project impacts and success were not reported in detail. Across four medical-surgical units in two Kaiser Permanente hospitals in the US, a Nurse Knowledge Exchange (NKE) was developed to integrate change management methods into the implantation of practice change. 56 Lewin’s Model was introduced along with the Concerns-Based Model and Force-Field Models and integrated with design-centric methods in approaches to implement service-design changes. 56 Although limited in its initial success, when underpinned with the addition of The cake model for change that more gradually introduced the participating nurses to change management concepts, the NKE achieved increased patient engagement and in-room shift exchange over a 7-month period. 56
In a larger scale institutional project, Riches 4 Stages Model was applied to transitioning a radiation therapy department to a new hospital site. 64 The model identifies key feelings and experiences of people moving through change and was used as a grounding for developing approaches to mitigate any negative feelings arising and to support the change to come about. The authors reported the model as valuable in supporting smooth transition. 64
A final study of a large four-year change project introducing technology upgrades into a healthcare organisation utilised the Change Acceleration Process (CAP) model. 66 Critically, this study identified the core value of utilising change management methodology as addressing the foundational basis for change; and clinician engagement in a shared need and vision. 66 The authors reported that clinical engagement, and the considerations regarding the time required to be engaged, were important components of successful change. 66
Six national or system-wide projects were identified. 42 , 53 , 55 , 70–72 Kotter’s model was employed to bring about change in one of these through the use of peer-review models in radiation oncology across 14 cancer treatment centres in Canada. 42 Over a two-year period, the proportion of radical-intent radiation therapy courses peer reviewed increased from 43.5% to 68%, with some sites reaching over 95% use of peer-review. 42 In a Swedish region, 26 clinics participated in an examination of how local level change agents worked as a development unit group across the clinics. 55 The notion of the change agent is drawn from the Lewin Model, with links to change generators which are highlighted by the study as key within change efforts. In this study, it should be noted that the model was not applied to explore the role throughout the study. 55 In a further project across Geriatric Education Centres in the US, Lewin’s Model was applied to explore the relationship between changing practice and changes in an organisational context. 53 The model was retrofitted to two projects rather than applied prospectively to manage the change process. 53
One international multi-system project was identified that reported the management of change in a World Health Organisation (WHO) project seeking to shift Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) from a guideline to integrated care pathways using mobile technology in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity. 32 Employing Kotter’s model, the WHO working group employed a broad range of approaches and activities across more than 70 countries, engaging with national allergy programs and agencies to bring about change reporting substantial success over an 18-year period. 32 The project continues to engage the Kotter steps for each change cycle.
Balluck et al reporting the use of the Prosci ADKAR model along with the CLARC model through the CoVID-19 pandemic to transition from primary to team nursing, in which a team of health professionals manage a patient under one registered nurse, across 25 hospitals in US health system. 60 The study primarily reported a range of activities to undertake to align to each element of the models and concluded that the application of these models enabled leaders to plan for change more systematically, leading to successful change. 60 In a non-OECD context, two studies led by the same author reported the application of AIM to bring about change in two hospitals in Uganda and two hospitals in Nepal. In maternity services in Uganda and Nepal, change occurred through dissemination workshops, reminders, case reviews, practical workshops and team building guided by AIM methodology. The operationalisation of AIM was not detailed in the studies. 61 , 62
Whilst many studies utilised structured change management models reported successful change, it was not possible to detect whether the use of a model, method or process contributed to the success. In five qualitative studies, analysis and commentary pieces explored the change management of successful and/or less successful projects against the Kotter steps in an attempt to explore whether the application of change management models differed in successful and/or unsuccessful projects in terms of the number of steps completed or the way in which they were completed. 31 , 34 , 39 , 44 , 57
Baloh et al followed eight hospitals in the US through a two-year implementation of team huddles (TeamSTEPPS) to explore, through interviews with 47 leader and change managers or champions, how they performed in relation to the three overarching Kotter phases. 31 Half of the hospitals progressed along all of the three broad phases and components within, with adherence to the Kotter steps in the first phase influencing the success of the final two phases. 31 Hospitals that did not adhere to the Kotter phases did however demonstrate successful change, with the scope and strategies used for implementation identified as key factors in successful change in these instances; linking the huddles to performance indicators, having a local-level scope or having a strong strategic approach to gain staff buy-in for projects of broader scope all contributed to successful change. 31 Similarly, Carman et al mapped, through interviews with key change agents, the application of Kotter’s model to organisational change in a US health centre. 34 The application of all eight stages of this model was apparent through the interviews and reported as central to the successful change effort to ensure a systematic process. 34
Using the Lewin and McKinsey 7S models together, Sokol et al described the application of change management theory to office-wide culture and structural support to meet the twin goals of safe opioid prescribing and treating patients with opioid-use disorder. 73 Integrating two approaches enabled the team to address specific change management issues under a broader framework of the overall change management process under the Lewin model. 73
In a larger scale project, a multidisciplinary group of staff involved in the development of the medication management services in each of six health systems across Minnesota were interviewed to explore the degree to which Kotter’s steps were followed during the development of the service change. 44 Thirteen emerging themes were grouped against the Kotter model and highlighted that supportive culture and team-based collaborative care were critical to the success of their change. Specifically, the programs reported as successful were those introduced in systems that used change management methods aligned more closely with the Kotter model. 44 In the final qualitative piece, Hopkins et al provided a commentary analysis on implementing a gainsharing program to incentivise value- over volume-based practice in two hospital and health systems in one US state. 39 This study reinforced the other qualitative works indicating that change management approaches that more comprehensively mapped to the Kotter model were associated with successful change projects in the implementation of gainsharing. 39
Our findings identify multiple change management models that are applied to bring about change in healthcare teams, services and organisations. In the reviewed articles, it was apparent that change management models provided a frame of reference for change agents to support them to consider key elements required for change to occur and be sustained. Key elements include exploring why change is needed and crafting the right messages for stakeholders at every step to bring them along on the change journey. In the included studies, models that included a series of stages or steps, eg, Lewin or Kotter provided change agents with a series of goal posts to monitor and to create moments of celebration along the change journey. Notably, there was little emphasis on reliance on the models to overcome resistance or develop specific change activities; their value was consistently in providing a broad guiding framework for clinicians creating change. 32
Drawing upon change management models as a guiding framework rather than as a prescriptive management process is in keeping with contemporary thinking regarding healthcare as a complex adaptive system. A complex adaptive system seeks to draw out and mobilize the natural creativity of health care professionals to adapt to circumstances and to evolve new and better ways of achieving quality akin to bottom-up change and requires change agents to shift away from the reliance on top-down, highly controlled change processes. 18 On this basis, we propose that when change management models are adopted with sufficient flexibility to be relevant to the context in which they are being applied and empower local level change agents, change management models may be used to compliment and support improvement and implementation methodologies. For example, Baloh et al in exploring the introduction and implementation of huddles in rural US hospitals noted the value of integrating broad concepts from change management models, particularly in relation to the earlier model steps, with appropriate implementation scope and strategies. 31
The primary change methodologies identified in this review were Kotter’s 8-Steps and Lewin’s Freeze – Unfreeze – Freeze model. Methods also emerged from this review that are not as prominent as other change management models and methods but appeared to be used successfully to create and sustain change in healthcare delivery models and services. These methods include Accelerated Implementation Methodology, Young’s Nine Stage Framework, Riches four-stage model of change, and General Electric’s proprietary change management model known as Change Acceleration Process (CAP), among others. This review has not determined one change management model as preferred over another. This finding suggests that the guiding framework and flexibility within this to enable a range of activities and actions suited to the particular circumstance is of key value rather than a particular change management approach. It was notable that in the context of healthcare, change management models were often used by clinicians in local-level projects. The models were rarely used to address issues of resistance and more often used to provide a framework to house a broad and diverse range of activities to facilitate successful sustained change.
Clinician engagement in the change process emerged as a critical factor for change to take hold and be sustained. Projects that were successful were often led by clinicians and/or positioned in terms of the benefits for patients or staff. 74–76 Our findings confirm existing evidence that suggests that when the patient or staff benefits are unclear, clinicians may be less engaged with the change activities leading to challenges in gaining and sustaining momentum with the change. 77
Change is naturally challenging for humans, particularly when it is rapid and ongoing. 78 , 79 Our findings reinforce current knowledge that those directly and indirectly affected by change are more likely to commit to and embrace change when they contribute to the decision-making about the change, and understand why and how the change is going to improve patient and/or staff experiences or the healthcare environment. 80 This is particularly noted in the context of change for quality enhancement. 74 , 81
The review findings suggest that when exploring evidence-based methodologies for creating and sustaining change, an integrative approach that draws upon models for change to support applications of models for improvement and/or implementation may be valuable for change agents. The common guiding principles found in many of the models utilised in the review, such as Kotter and Lewin’s models, highlight core common principles of involving people in change from the outset, working with their feelings about change and supporting change through good communication and collaboration behaviours. 82 , 83 These fundamental steps for change can be operationalised through drawing upon the Model for Improvement, which is underpinned by Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge and “Psychology of Change” principles. 84 The Model for Improvement highlights leveraging individuals’ motivation, or agency, as well as the collective agency of the team and a system that enables individuals and teams to exercise that agency. 82 , 83
The guiding principles of the change management models we identified as commonly used in healthcare seek to create an enabling culture for change; seen through shared ways of thinking, assumptions and visible manifestations. 85 Characteristics of an enabling culture in the reviewed studies included supportive and authentic leadership and sponsorship, engaged and committed staff, multi-disciplinary team involvement, a collaborative approach to work, strong communication behaviours and models, the ability to resolve conflict and capable staff with the capacity to engage in further development. The reviewed articles suggest an enabling culture for change is central to creating opportunities for and supporting clinician engagement from decision-making about change through to change implementation. 74 , 85 As such, there are implications for implementation research and appear to be opportunities to integrate change management and implementation models to enhance processes of healthcare change. It is well established that implementation research is focused to more than translation of evidence from bench to bedside. As the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of clinical research findings and other evidence-based practices into routine practice, and hence to improve the quality (effectiveness, reliability, safety, appropriateness, equity, efficiency) of health care, it is inextricably linked with healthcare change and its management. 86 Knowledge of influences on clinician and organisational behaviour gained through implementation research may provide substantial insight into approaches to operationalise change management.
One artefact of organisations with cultures supportive of change is the presence of co-design efforts. 87 Co-design is a method to meaningfully engage about a process or service change with service users, which can include staff, patients and caregivers. 88 The concept of co-design aligns well with change management, improvement and implementation science principles that converge on the centrality of stakeholder-led or support change. 89 Co-design approaches therefore provide one mechanism through which change management, improvement and implementation methods may be integrated for the purpose of creating change for quality improvement. Such approaches are however contingent on appropriate supports to ensure participants have both the capability and capacity to engage. 90
Our findings must be considered in terms of the limitations of the included studies and the review process. It is possible that some relevant studies were not captured by the database search or were made available after the search date. The included studies were often case examples of change initiatives with limited breadth of sample and a lack of detail reported about the research methods. The quality of such studies was therefore challenging to appraisal due to the limited reported information. The ability to generalise findings from such studies was also limited when case examples were utilised. We do note however that the wide range of included studies demonstrated consistent commonalities across change principles and applications of change management models across multiple settings and change projects in health.
Change management models are commonly applied to guide change processes at local, institutional and system-levels in healthcare. Clinician-led change is common, with the value of change management models being primarily to provide a supportive yet flexible framework to direct change processes. The review also highlights the potential opportunities to integrate models for change management with models commonly applied for improvement and implementation to support positive changes in healthcare.
No funding linked to this submission.
All data included in the review are publicly available research findings.
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
COMMENTS
1) Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola, the beverage titan, acknowledged the necessity to evolve with consumer tastes, market shifts, and regulatory changes. The rise of health-conscious consumers prompted Coca-Cola to revamp its offerings and business approach. The company's proactive Change Management centred on innovation and diversification, leading to ...
Netflix Change Management Case Study. Tahir Abbas December 9, 2022. Netflix is one of the world's leading internet television networks with over 100 million members in 190 countries. It has a wide variety of award-winning original programming, documentaries, TV shows and feature films. Netflix offers a subscription services to its users to ...
Starbucks Change Management Case Study. Tahir Abbas March 4, 2023. Change is a constant in any business, and successful organizations must adapt to changes in the industry, market, and consumer preferences to remain competitive. The ability to manage change is crucial to the survival of businesses in today's dynamic market environment.
MacDonald Change Management Case Study. Tahir Abbas March 5, 2023. McDonald's, one of the most recognizable fast-food chains in the world, has undergone significant changes in recent years to adapt to changing market trends and consumer preferences. These changes required a comprehensive change management strategy to ensure a smooth ...
Amazon: The Ultimate Change Management Case Study. By WalkMe Team. Updated June 20, 2024. Amazon's innovations have helped it become extremely successful, making it an excellent change management case study. Since it was formed, Amazon has innovated across countless areas and industries, including: Delivery. Warehouse automation.
As mentioned, industry- or company-specific features may also have great influence on managing change. In order to draw conclusions on successful change management in project-based organizations and construction companies, theories within the field must be explored. Table 1. Primary Frameworks Applied in Article Within the Field of Change ...
The following post is adapted from my personal academic coursework.Case Studies in Change LeadershipAt its essence, leadership is a change-focused enterprise. Leaders influence others to change. While this influence takes place at various levels and through diverse means, change is always the common denominator. Change is the distinguishing feature of leadership. History contains accounts of ...
This case demonstrates the importance of weaving change management into the fabric of tech companies, especially for cultural shifts. 6. Security systems. A high-tech security company effectively managed a major restructuring. They created a change network that shifted change management from HR to business processes:
Several studies have highlighted that most organizational change initiatives fail, with an estimated failure rate of 60-70%. 1,5,6 High failure rate raises the sustained concern and interest about the factors that can decrease failure and increase the success of organizational change. 7 Researchers and consultancy firms have developed several change management models that can improve the ...
Whilst these findings and case studies are UK-based, the broader trends and implications should be of interest wherever you are based. Download the report and individual case studies below. Landing transformational change: Closing the gap between theory and practice - Report. PDF document 474.5 KB. BBC Worldwide case study. PDF document 107.2 KB.
Managing Change in Uncertain Times: A Case Study. Change management, defined as the methods and processes by which a company effects and adapts to change, has long been vital to the functioning of successful organizations. As John C. Maxwell said, "change is inevitable, growth is optional.". All organizations undergo changes during their ...
This study was an evaluation of the approach to change that is used in the public sector. The approach that is chosen ultimately has a bearing on the management of change in an organisation. The study used a case study method to explore the key question of the approach using the six dimensions of change. The South African
If all the above-described Change Management items account for what did go well in the first case, what went wrong in the second one? A common mistake is to jump right into equipping the people without raising Awareness and creating Desire. This second case study clearly illustrates the consequences of not laying the foundations for the change.
The divergence of the fortunes of Apple and Microsoft highlights perfectly the growth potential achievable from a combined approach of change and innovation. Both Microsoft and Apple are great companies with huge customer loyalty and fantastic products. In the 1990's Apple was almost broke while Microsoft was in the market-dominant position.
A Change Management Case Study Interview is a specialized assessment method that may involve various change scenarios, such as IT system migration, company mergers, or adjusting brand positioning due to shifts in consumer sentiment. The case challenges the candidate's ability to analyze, strategize, and implement change in a real-world scenario.
5 Steps in the Change Management Process. 1. Prepare the Organization for Change. For an organization to successfully pursue and implement change, it must be prepared both logistically and culturally. Before delving into logistics, cultural preparation must first take place to achieve the best business outcome.
1.7 Limitations of the Case Study 9 1.8 Envisioned Benefits of the Study 9 1.9 Thesis Outline 9 1.10 Summary 10 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 The Phenomenon of Change 14 2.3 Change Management - A Brief Overview of the Field 21 2.4 Reasons for Change 26 2.5 Models of and Approaches to Change and Change Management 30
Learning about them through a short case study is an excellent way to gain a better understanding of these concepts. Here are 05 short case studies on change management that offer you valuable insights on managing change. 1. Adobe- a transformation of HR functions to support strategic change. Many a times external factors lead to changes in ...
It all leads to one conclusion. Change is never done alone. It takes the interactivity of every aspect of an organization (leaders, individual contributors, tools) to make change management successful. Gone are the days of five year plans. Today's speed of business requires an agile organization who can change even as frequently as 12 - 18 ...
Summary.. When tasked with implementing large-scale organizational change, leaders often give too much attention to the what of change — such as a new organization strategy, operating model or ...
Change management - A case study on Coca Cola Corporation. Coca Cola is a retailer, marketer and manufacturer of non-alcoholic drinks and is known worldwide for it coca cola beverage. In addition to its coca cola brand, Coca Cola Company offers 500 beverages and non beverages brands in about two hundred countries. ... Conclusion. To conclude ...
Change management consists of models and strategies to help employees accept new organizational developments. Change management practitioners and academic researchers view organizational change differently (Hughes, 2007; Pollack & Pollack, 2015). Saka (2003) states, "there is a gap between what the rational-linear change management approach ...
UX case studies must be kept short, and, when considering the length of your beginning, process and conclusion sections, it's the beginning and the conclusion sections that should be the shortest of all. In some case studies, you can keep the ending to two or three short phrases. Other, longer case studies about more complex projects may ...
Conclusion. Change management methodologies were often used as guiding principle to underpin a change in complex healthcare contexts. The lack of prescription application of the change management methodologies was identified. ... A change management case study for safe opioid prescribing and opioid use disorder treatment. J Am Board Fam Med ...
PHASE 1: AWAKENING. Identify what needs to change. Articulate the gap between the present and the desired state, and make the case for change through the vision for change. Manage the readi-ness for change of key stakeholders, whose approval is needed to proceed, and gain their approval. PHASE 2: