alternative dissertation formats in education based doctorates

Next available on Sunday 2–10 p.m.

Additional Options

• smartphone Call / Text
• voice_chat Consultation Appointment
• place Visit
• email Email

Chat with a Specific library

• College Library (Undergraduate) College Library Chat is Offline
• Ebling Library (Health Sciences) Ebling Library Chat is Offline
• Information School Library (Information Studies) iSchool Library Chat is Offline
• Law Library (Law) Law Library Chat is Offline
• MERIT Library (Education) MERIT Library Chat is Offline
• Ask a Librarian Hours & Policy
• Library Research Tutorials

Search the for Website expand_more Articles Find articles in journals, magazines, newspapers, and more Catalog Explore books, music, movies, and more Databases Locate databases by title and description Journals Find journal titles UWDC Discover digital collections, images, sound recordings, and more Website Find information on spaces, staff, services, and more

Language website search.

Find information on spaces, staff, and services.

• ASK a Librarian
• Library by Appointment
• Locations & Hours
• Resources by Subject

book Catalog Search

Search the physical and online collections at UW-Madison, UW System libraries, and the Wisconsin Historical Society.

• Available Online
• Print/Physical Items
• Limit to UW-Madison
• Advanced Search
• Browse by...

collections_bookmark Database Search

Find databases subscribed to by UW-Madison Libraries, searchable by title and description.

• Browse by Subject/Type
• Introductory Databases
• Top 10 Databases

article Journal Search

Find journal titles available online and in print.

• Browse by Subject / Title
• Citation Search

description Article Search

Find articles in journals, magazines, newspapers, and more.

• Scholarly (peer-reviewed)
• Open Access
• Library Databases

collections UW Digital Collections Search

Discover digital objects and collections curated by the UW Digital Collections Center .

• Browse Collections
• Browse UWDC Items
• University of Wisconsin–Madison
• Email/Calendar
• Google Apps
• Loans & Requests
• Poster Printing
• Account Details
• Archives and Special Collections Requests
• Library Room Reservations

Search the UW-Madison Libraries

Article search, alternative dissertation formats in education-based doctorates.

• The doctorate and doctoral writing remain popular areas of inquiry and discussion, and yet very little research has empirically investigated the trends in dissertation types and how these trends might indicate broader changes in dissertation writing practices. This article builds on our recent work that investigated the macrostructures and research designs of 1,373 education-based PhD dissertations from five major Canadian research universities. In this current article, we more deeply explore the emergence in popularity of two 'alternative' or non-traditional dissertation macrostructures in education fields: the manuscript-style dissertation and the topic-based PhD dissertation. We highlight the popularity of these two dissertation types as evidence of shifting notions of what doctoral research and dissertations can (and do) look like in contemporary PhD programs. We focus specifically on these two dissertation macrostructures that were prevalent in our analysis, yet which are scarcely addressed in education-based dissertation resources. We provide a deeper reflection on the popularity of these dissertation models from our large-scale study, the ways these types of dissertations are organized at the global (macrostructural) level, and the chosen research designs, number of chapters, word counts, and authorship status (as either single-authored, partially co-authored, or mostly co-authored texts).
• language No full text / online access available
• file_copy Request A Copy

Having Trouble?

If you are having trouble accessing the article, report a problem.

Physical Copies

Publication details.

• academic literacy
• Academic writing
• Content Analysis
• Doctoral Dissertations
• doctoral education
• Doctoral Students
• Foreign Countries
• graduate education
• Literary Genres

Additional Information

Library staff details, keyboard shortcuts, available anywhere, available in search results.

Supplementary Data

Alternative dissertation formats in education-based doctorates

Authors: Anderson, Tim ;  Saunders, Gillian ;  Alexander, Ian

Source: Higher Education Research & Development , Volume 41, Number 3, 16 April 2022, pp. 593-612(20)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1867513

• < return to abstract

Share Content

• Free content
• Partial Free content
• New content
• Open access content
• Partial Open access content
• Subscribed content
• Partial Subscribed content
• Free trial content

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world

• gary.holden@nyu.edu
• @ Info4Practice

Alternative dissertation formats in education-based doctorates

Volume 41, Issue 3, May 2022, Page 593-612 .

Read the full article ›

Dissertation in Practice: Reconceptualizing the Nature and Role of the Practitioner-Scholar

Cite this chapter.

• Valerie A. Storey &
• Bryan D. Maughan  

469 Accesses

3 Citations

The richness of dialog about the differing approaches to doctoral educational research from the viewpoint of a scholar and from the viewpoint of the professional has been inspiring and continues to shed new light on the role of the practitioner who performs research under the aegis of the academe (Butlerman-Bos, 2008; Drake & Heath, 2011; Hochbein & Perry, 2013; Jarvis, 1999b; Shulman, Golde, Bueschel, & Garabedian, 2006). However, there continues to be a curious lack of understanding about the signature product of a practitioner performing scholarly research who must satisfy the demands of both viewpoints (Dawson & Kumar, 2014; Willis, Inman, & Valenti, 2010). Accountability to traditionally disparate institutions—the academe and professional practice stakeholders (decision-makers)—decries innovative approaches to the capstone product—the dissertation. We will continue this discussion by outlining the unique characteristics of the dissertation produced by a practitioner who performed educational research. We refer to a dissertation produced by a practitioner while in practice as the Dissertation in Practice (DiP) (ProDEL, 2012; Storey & Maughan, 2014). We continue the discussion about how methodologies of applied or practice-oriented research assists the researcher in professional preparation, public service, outreach, and organizational change (Shulman, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

The Retrospective PhD by Publication: A Lesser Doctorate?

Critical Friends’ Perspectives on Problems of Practice and Inquiry in an EdD Program

Pressures, Pathways, and Practices: Learning as a First-Year International Research Candidate

Archbald, D. (2010). “Breaking the mold” in the dissertation: Implementing a problem based, decision-oriented thesis project. Journal of Continuing Higher Education , 58 (2), 99–107.

Article   Google Scholar  

Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters . Cambridge: Polity Press.

Google Scholar  

Beebe, J. (2001). Rapid assessment process: An introduction . Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bhoyrub, J., Hurley, J., Neilson, G. R., Ramsay, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Heutagogy: An alternative practice based learning approach. Nurse Education in Practice , 10 , 322–326.

Bouck, B. M. (2011). Scholar-practitioner identity: A liminal perspective. Scholar Practitioner Quarterly , 5 (2), 201–210.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Butlerman-Bos, J. A. (2008). Will a clinical approach make education research more relevant for practice? Educational Researcher , 37 (7), 412–420.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher , 28 (7), 15–25.

Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Christensen, C., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns . New York: McGraw-Hill.

Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership , 51 (2), 49–51.

Costley, C., & Lester, S. (2012). Work-based doctorates: Professional extension at the highest levels. Studies in Higher Education , 37 (3), 257–269. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.503344

Council of Graduate Schools. (2007). CGS task force report on the professional doctorate . Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy & Theory41 (1), 34–45.

Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning . Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education, Oryx.

Dawson, K., & Kumar, S. (2014). An analysis of professional practice Ed.D. dissertations in educational technology. TechTrends , 58 (4), 62–72.

De Jong, M. J., Moser, D. K., & Hall, L. A. (2005). The manuscript option dissertation: Multiple perspectives. Nurse Author & Editor , 15 (3), 7–9.

Donovan, G. T. (2013). MyDigitalFootprint.ORG: Young people and proprietary ecology of everyday data . Retrieved from: http://mydigitalfootprint.org /dissertation/.

Drake, P., & Heath, L. (2011). Practitioner research at doctoral level: Developing coherent research methodologies . New York: Routledge.

Duke, N. K., & Beck, S. W. (1999). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Research , 28 (3), 31–36.

Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M., & Summers, J. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention , 33 (3), 186–200.

Finch, B. (1998). Developing the skills for evidence-based practice. Nurse Education Today , 18 (1), 46–51.

Fulton, J., Kuit, J., Sanders, G., & Smith, P. (2012). The role of the Professional Doctorate in developing professional practice. Journal of Nursing Management , 20 (1), 130–139.

Gross, D., Alhusen, J., & Jennings, B. M. (2012). Authorship ethics with the dissertation manuscript option. Research in Nursing & Health , 35 (5), 431–434.

Guthrie, J. W. (2009). The case for a modern doctor of education degree (EdD): Multipurpose education doctorates no longer appropriate. Peabody Journal of Education , 84 (1), 3–8.

Gutierrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education , 61 (1/2), 100–117.

Hochbein, C., & Perry, J. A. (2013). The role of research in the professional doctorate. Planning & Changing , 44 (3/4), 181–195.

Holmes, B. D., Seay, A. D., & Wilson, K. N. (2009). Re-envisioning the dissertation stage of doctoral study: Traditional mistakes with non-traditional learners. Journal of College Teaching and Learning , 6 (8), 9–13.

Jarvis, P. (1999a). The practitioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Jarvis, P. (1999b). Global trends in lifelong learning and the response of the universities. Comparative Education , 35 (2), 249–257. Retrieved from r0/docview/195149382?accountid=98

Klein, J. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and integration. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Shunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 23–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. E, & Swanson, R. A. (2012). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development . Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Kram, K. E., Wasserman, I. C., & Yip, J. (2012). Metaphors of identity and professional practice: Learning from the scholar-practitioner. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 48 (3), 304–341.

Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvementguide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Margolin, V. (2010). Doctoral education in design: Problems and prospects. Design Issues , 26 (3), 70–78.

Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations: Lessons from innovative programs. School Leadership Review , 1 (1), 33–57. Retrieved from http://www.tcpea.org /slr/2005/murphy.pdf

Patton, S. (2013). The dissertation can no longer be defended. Chronicles of Higher Education . Retrieved from: http://ida.lib.uidaho.edu:2282 /article/The-DissertationCan-No-Longer/137215/

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension . Chicago, IL: Random House.

Prewitt, K. (2006). Who should do what? Implications for institutional and national leaders. In C. Golde & G. Walker (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education (pp. 23–33). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Professional Doctorate in Educational Leadership [ProDEL]. (2012). Dissertation in practice guidelines (DP-2.2-Fa12). Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA: Author.

QAA. (2011). Doctoral degree qualifications . London, UK: QAA.

Reid, W. M. (1978). Will the future generations of biologists write a dissertation? Bioscience , 28 , 651–654.

Reardon, R. M., & Shakeshaft, C. (2013). Criterion-inspired, emergent design in doctoral education: A critical friend perspective. In V. A. Storey (Ed.), Redesigning professional education doctorates: Application of critical friendship theory to the EdD (pp. 177–194). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Robinson, S., & Dracup, K. (2008). Innovative options for the doctoral dissertation in nursing. Nursing Outlook , 56 (4), 174–178.

Shulman, L. S. (2010, April 4). Doctoral education shouldn’t be a marathon. The Chronicle of Higher Education , 56 (30), B9–B12.

Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher , 35 (3), 25–32.

Smith, S. (2014). Beyond the dissertation monograph. Reprinted from the Spring 2010 MLA Newsletter . Retrieved from http://www.mla.org /blog&topic=133

Smith, S., Sanders, G., Fulton, J., & Kuit, J. (2014). An alternative approach to the final assessment of professional doctorate candidates. Paper presented at 4th International Conference on Professional Doctorates , April 10–11, 2014, Cardiff, Wales: United Kingdom Council on Graduate Education.

Sousanis, N. (2015). Unflattening: A visual-verbal inquiry into learning in many dimensions . Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu /catalog.php?isbn=9780674744431.

Stevens, D. A. (2010). A comparison of non-traditional capstone experiences in Ed.D. programs at three highly selective private research universities (Order No. 3418175). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text: Social Sciences; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: Social Sciences (750445117). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com /docview/750445117?accountid=9817

Storey, V. A., & Hartwick, P. (2010). Critical friends: Supporting a small, private university face the challenges of crafting an innovative scholar-practitioner doctorate. In G. Jean-Marie & A. H. Normore (Eds.), Educational leadership preparation: Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches to the EdD and graduate education (pp. 111–133). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan Publishers.

Storey, V. A., & Maughan, B. D. (2014). Beyond a definition: Designing and specifying Dissertation in Practice (DiP) models . Pittsburgh, PA: The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. Retrieved from: http://cpedinitiative.org /findings

Storey, V. A., & Richard, B. (2013). Critical friend groups: Moving beyond mentoring. In V. A. Storey (Ed.), Redesigning professional education doctorates: Application of critical friendship theory to the EdD (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: Supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving Schools , 7 (3), 267–278.

Thomas, R. (2015). The effectiveness of alternative dissertation models in graduate education . Unpublished master’s thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Thomas, R., West, R., & Rich, P. (2015). The effectiveness ofalternative dissertation models in graduate education . Under Review. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Vanderbilt University Peabody College (2015). Ed.D. Capstone Experience. Retrieved from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu /departments/lpo/graduate_and_professional_programs/edd/capstone_experience/index.php

Willis, J., Inman, D., & Valenti, R. (2010). Completing a professional practice dissertation: A guide for doctoral students and faculty . Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311–318.

Zusman, A. (2013). How new kinds of professional doctorates are changing higher education institutions . Research & Occasional Paper Series: 8.13. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley.

Download references

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Copyright information.

© 2016 Valerie A. Storey and Bryan D. Maughan

About this chapter

Storey, V.A., Maughan, B.D. (2016). Dissertation in Practice: Reconceptualizing the Nature and Role of the Practitioner-Scholar. In: Storey, V.A. (eds) International Perspectives on Designing Professional Practice Doctorates. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137527066_13

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137527066_13

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, New York

Print ISBN : 978-1-349-56385-2

Online ISBN : 978-1-137-52706-6

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

BYU ScholarsArchive

• < Previous

Home > Theses and Dissertations > 5276

Theses and Dissertations

The effectiveness of alternative dissertation models in graduate education.

Rebecca Arlene Thomas , Brigham Young University - Provo Follow

Historically, the doctoral dissertation has had two purposes: to train young scholars in proper research methodology, and to contribute original findings to research. However, some feel that the traditional dissertation format falls short of these goals for two reasons. First, the majority of dissertations never get published in academic journals, and dissertations are unlikely to get cited in academic articles. Second, many students in doctoral programs see little authenticity in traditional dissertations because the writing style and process differ from that of academic articles. In response to these concerns, many Instructional Technology programs have implemented alternative dissertation formats. This study used survey data to investigate the benefits, challenges, perceptions and current practices of alternative dissertation formats in Instructional Technology. Online surveys were sent to 74 students, 61 alumni, and 38 faculty of Instructional Technology programs in 2010, and 78 students, 43 alumni, and 12 department representatives in 2014. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Surveys found that alumni who completed alternative dissertation formats received more citations for their dissertations than those who completed traditional dissertations, showing that alternative dissertations increase the likelihood of impact. Additionally, respondents reported that alternative dissertation formats facilitate authenticity and collaboration, and prepare students for a career in academia. However, some participants perceived alternative dissertations as less rigorous than traditional dissertations, with ambiguous requirements and expectations of quality. More research is needed in order to understand current practices for alternative dissertation formats in Instructional Technology.

College and Department

David O. McKay School of Education; Instructional Psychology and Technology

http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/

BYU ScholarsArchive Citation

Thomas, Rebecca Arlene, "The Effectiveness of Alternative Dissertation Models in Graduate Education" (2015). Theses and Dissertations . 5276. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5276

Date Submitted

Document type.

http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/etd8510

alternative dissertation formats, multiple article format, instructional technology

Since July 09, 2015

Included in

Educational Psychology Commons

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS

ScholarsArchive ISSN: 2572-4479

• Collections
• Disciplines
• Scholarly Communication
• Additional Collections
• Academic Research Blog

Author Corner

Hosted by the.

• Harold B. Lee Library

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

• DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1867513
• Corpus ID: 234294140

Alternative dissertation formats in education-based doctorates

• T. Anderson , G. Saunders , Ian Alexander
• Published in Higher Education Research and… 6 January 2021

6 Citations

Educational technology research trends: a 10-year content analysis of phd dissertations, mapping the landscape of doctoral research in technologies in education: a 25-year analysis in portuguese universities, challenges of writing theses and dissertations in an efl context: genre and move analysis of abstracts written by turkish m.a. and ph.d. students, enhancing professional identity through scholarship: examining the publication of dissertations in counselor education and supervision in peer-reviewed journals.

• Highly Influenced

Temporal change in dissertation macrostructures

The phd by publication in the humanities and social sciences: a cross country analysis, 49 references, an examination of education-based dissertation macrostructures, research news and comment: education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation, content analysis of phd and edd dissertations in special education, thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice.

• Highly Influential

Benefits, Challenges, and Perceptions of the Multiple Article Dissertation Format in Instructional Technology.

Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis, re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision / reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervisión, writing a manuscript-style dissertation in tesol/applied linguistics, non-native graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: self-reports by students and their advisors from two u.s. institutions, writing the qualitative dissertation: understanding by doing, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Alternative Dissertation Formats: Preparing Scholars for the Academy and Beyond

This chapter proposes that alternative dissertation formats be considered; namely a more creative, flexible model while still maintaining high intellectual standards for the academy. We specifically identify several options in this chapter: a three-paper dissertation with distinct yet cohesive manuscripts suitable for publication in scholarly journals, a lengthy one-paper manuscript, a novel, and a portfolio. The format must be suitable for both the discipline and the future faculty or administrative role.

Related Papers

Contemporary Approaches to Dissertation Development and Research Methods

Doris L. Watson

International Journal of Doctoral Studies

Sydney Freeman, Jr.

Aim/Purpose: The traditional doctoral dissertation is the first major research project that is led by doctoral students, but it does not necessarily prepare them to publish shorter articles in journals. The manuscript dissertation provides a way for doctoral students to establish themselves as researchers while gaining the experience of developing peer-reviewed manuscripts before graduation, thus enhancing career opportunities as tenure-track faculty. Background: This paper demonstrates how the manuscript dissertation can be employed to increase doctoral student publications before graduation. Methodology: This article uses autoethnography to describe the process and results of writing a manuscript dissertation. Contribution: This paper contrasts dissertation styles, explaining the benefits and challenges of the manuscript dissertation option in particular. Findings: I found that it was important to have an influential and established dissertation chair, develop credibility by displ...

Nurse author & editor

Based on our experiences at the University of Kentucky, the manuscript option dissertation is clearly a win-win situation from every angle. Other doctoral programs may find this approach invigorating. The ultimate benefit is the rapid dissemination of new knowledge to healthcare professionals for application to practice.

2008-03-12 Pre-print Part 7 4th Presentation for Don Jacobs. Routledge

Simon Pockley

Our last dissertation presentation before our closing speakers is also a biographical “participant story” of sorts, though it is a story about the author’s father and his expedition across the plains of Australia. It is also our only electronic dissertation representative. In fact, it was the world’s first electronic, Web-based dissertation as far as we know. Yes, Dr. Simon Pockley was responsible for the world’s first online doctoral thesis, “The Flight of Ducks,” which you can access on the World Wide Web. I’ll write it down for you now: www.duckdigital.net/FOD/. Simon receives invitations to speak at National and International forums where he speaks, and also writes about, values in the ecology of information management. He was a contributor to UNESCO’s Guide to Preservation and Digital Heritage as well as the UNESCO Guide to Electronic Theses and Dissertations. He lives in Australia and is in demand as a PhD supervisor, examiner, and student mentor. He works from time to time as a consultant.

School Leadership Review

Joseph Murphy

Composition Studies

Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services

Joanne Riebschleger

An author with a new doctorate shares lessons learned about writing a dissertation. Lessons include (1) there are few sources to guide one on how to write a dissertation; (2) it is easier to critique research than to create research; (3) dissertation writing is an evolutionary communication process; (4) criticism is good; (5) dissertation writing produces a product; (6) hypotheses rule and methods matter most; and (7) less is more. Additionally, the author asserts that (8) writing for dissertation is an apprenticeship experience that prepares one for writing for publication.

Comparative Education Review

Nancy Bradt

The present article analyzes dissertations written by international doctoral graduates at Teachers College during the first two decades of the twentieth century. By focusing on the earliest period of the doctoral program, our work seeks to understand the role of the dissertation archive in producing and governing the emerging field of academic education research with global entanglements. Questions about what constitutes a dissertation, what counts as scholarship, and how expertise is defined were all in flux at this time. Setting the lens exclusively on international students allows us to begin to see the generation of a global language of education shaped by power/knowledge relations within academia.

Journal of Campus Activities Practice and Scholarship

A quote often attributed to Michelangelo reads, “In every block of marble I see a statue as plain as though it stood before me, shaped and perfect in attitude and action. I have only to hew away the rough walls that imprison the lovely apparition to reveal it to the other eyes as mine see it” (Shaikh and Leonard-Amodeo, 2005, p. 75). There can be a temptation to see the act of chiseling a journal article out of one’s dissertation in similar terms. One cannot help but wonder if Michelangelo’s advisors ever presented him a piece of stone and said, “Yeah, you could get two or three angels out of this one.” However, “chop it down and submit something” is advice doctoral students often receive when thinking about publishing their dissertations. Such advice can lead to the modern-day equivalent of this approach – cutting and pasting a 20,000-40,000 word dissertation into 5,000-7,000 word journal article. This process, of course, often leads to expected results: a disjointed and wordy arti...

Anthony Pare

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Kate Pantelides

Bristol Institute for Learning and Teaching Blog

Aisling Tierney

Education Review

Ivet Parra Gaete

Publishing Research Quarterly

Dr. Jean-Pierre V. M. Herubel

Karissa Wojcik

Across the Disciplines

John Saylor

The New Birmingham Review, Dissertation Special Edition (2015)

Ioana Cerasella Chis , The New Birmingham Review , Eliza Garwood

Education Research International

Heather Skinner , Brychan Thomas

John D. Rissetto

instituteonteachingandmentoring.org

David Schuldberg

Harvard Theological Review

Jensine Andresen

Jaime Alfredo Cabrera

Penny Beile

International Journal of …

Claire Penketh

Education+ Training

Frances Slack

Rhetoric Review

Kara Poe Alexander

Yazd University

ali hashemi

Educational Researcher

Pat Thomson

Zaiddy Arsh

International Journal for Academic Development

Dannelle Stevens

James Mulholland

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

How can PhD researchers be supported to complete an alternative format thesis?

How universities can best support PhD researchers who wish to produce alternative format theses, based on a review of institutional policies

Caitlin Robinson

• More on this topic

Created in partnership with

You may also like

Popular resources

.css-1txxx8u{overflow:hidden;max-height:81px;text-indent:0px;} Emotions and learning: what role do emotions play in how and why students learn?

Teaching international students about academic integrity, contextual learning: linking learning to the real world, artificial intelligence and academic integrity: striking a balance, a diy guide to starting your own journal.

The alternative format PhD, which is made up of a series of peer-reviewed research papers, is growing in popularity internationally. However, in the UK, universities have been slower to adopt the format. Policies, guidance and support on this alternative approach are patchy at best, recent research reviewing policies from 135 institutions revealed.

There is a lack of consistent guidance between universities, as well as between disciplines and supervisory teams. This is likely to widen existing inequalities in the experience of PhD researchers, both between and within universities. In this article, we explore how universities can support PhD researchers who are interested in the alternative format thesis.

Benefits and challenges of the alternative format

The alternative PhD format has various benefits. It can help candidates to learn about the peer-review process . The format can support researchers to develop strong international networks of collaborators. Publications are of growing importance in securing future employment in an increasingly metric-driven academic sector.

• Resource collection: what I wish I’d known about academia
• THE podcast: how to be a good mentor and mentee
• Giving and receiving doctoral writing feedback

However, there are also challenges associated. A focus on publishing can affect how candidates prioritise time and effort. This is often at the expense of other useful activities, including networking or contributing to wider research culture. The format is less suited to certain subject areas where traditional research papers are less common, or slower to publish. It can be complex to negotiate authorship with the supervisor. Pressure to publish can also be damaging for student mental health and can occasionally promote questionable research practices.

Supporting PhD candidates with the alternative format PhD

For those who are interested, there are several ways that universities can help PhD researchers decide whether the format is suitable, and to make sure that they are supported throughout the process. Here are seven recommendations:

Address unevenness in support for the alternative format across institutions. Only a third of universities sampled had guidelines about the alternative PhD thesis format, rising to 58 per cent of research-intensive Russell Group universities. It is important to avoid differentiation between the experiences and opportunities that PhD researchers receive at different institutions, including the opportunity to submit an alternative format thesis. 

Support candidates to make informed decisions about the alternative format. Perhaps most importantly, the format isn’t for everyone. It will be more appropriate for some researchers, disciplines and projects. University policies should provide guidance about the potential benefits and drawbacks, and prompt early conversations with supervisors, so that candidates can make an informed decision.

Adopt a common terminology across institutions. This seems quite a simple recommendation, but the alternative format has 14 different names depending on the university. Adopting a common terminology would help to facilitate comparison and shared understanding for candidates, supervisors and examiners across institutions.

Clearly define the role of the supervisor in the process. Supervisors play an important role in the publication of papers, but we know that quality of supervision varies . PhD researchers should not feel pressured by supervisors to publish. Universities need to provide clear guidance for how co-author arrangements are agreed.

Ensure appropriate recognition of the contribution of the PhD candidate. There have long been concerns about certain researchers not being properly recognised in collaborative research, based on seniority, race, gender and other forms of social difference. Most institutions that facilitate the alternative format thesis ask that candidates provide a statement describing their contribution to each paper. But they must also provide advice on navigating the authorship process and properly recognise the candidate’s contribution.

Offer flexibility in publication expectations. The number of publications expected varies widely, but most universities do not require a specific number. This flexibility is important. It allows students to overcome a major hurdle to the alternative format thesis by reducing the potential for the publication process to slow down PhD submission. It also accounts for different publication practices between disciplines.

Provide coherent guidance to potential examiners. Presenting a thesis where the majority of research has already undergone peer review is likely to change the examination process. But few universities make recommendations for what the exam should look like. It is important that universities emphasise that even if papers have undergone peer review and been published, they are not beyond examination. Sitting alone, a peer-reviewed paper is unlikely to constitute the body of original research necessary for a PhD qualification.

Caitlin Robinson is an academic fellow and proleptic lecturer at the University of Bristol.

If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week,  sign up for the Campus newsletter .

The iScanner app supports the academic community in information sharing and management

Emotions and learning: what role do emotions play in how and why students learn, six strategies for boosting student attendance, how hard can it be testing ai detection tools, the podcast: what constitutes good teaching in higher education, inefficient invoicing remains a risk for universities despite digital transformation.

Register for free

and unlock a host of features on the THE site

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

Challenges of Writing Theses and Dissertations in an EFL Context: Genre and Move Analysis of Abstracts Written by Turkish M.A. and Ph.D. Students

Serdar sükan.

1 Department of Modern Languages, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Turkey

Behbood Mohammadzadeh

2 ELT Department, Faculty of Education, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Turkey

Associated Data

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Writing a thesis or dissertation is a challenging procedure as it is one of the requirements of getting a graduate and postgraduate diploma. Writing an abstract like other parts of a thesis or dissertation has its criterion. For this reason, due to globalism, those abstracts written by non-native English speakers may lack some of the features of the abstract genre and move that must be included. This study examines the moves of M.A. and Ph.D. abstracts written by Turkish students between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University. The data consisted of 50 abstracts chosen randomly from the ELT department. For the analysis, Hyland’s five-move model has been used. The study results reveal that 40 abstracts did not follow the five moves that Hyland has put forward. Moreover, it can be stated that the absence of some moves in the abstracts may cause restraint for readers to comprehend these studies in terms of communicative purposes.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of students willing to get a diploma in their postgraduate fields. Thus, it became necessary to conduct research on the written abstracts as they are considered the essential section of the written theses that will give the reader an idea of the value of the whole dissertation. Hence, to draw attention to its importance and highlight the features that must be included in them, abstract analysis becomes more significant at this point. Especially for those writing their M.A. or Ph.D. abstracts, to guide them on what is needed. Any abstract that is going to be written needs systematic and organized work. The absence of these may lead to comprehension problems and may cause less attention. Poorly written abstracts can have unwanted results and may not receive enough credit or be read. To avoid this, what is expected is that a writer should have all the necessary skills to write good abstracts, which should be seen or understood from the moment one looks at the study. Genres and moves should be included and defined so that every reader understands each step clearly without reading the whole research. Genre is a literary term, and genre analysis is a sort of discourse done to check the reliability of communicative purposes. So, it includes an analysis of the style and text. Abstracts as genres have become a key tool for investigators because they offer them a chance to choose the appropriate study for their investigation ( Chen and Su, 2011 ; Yelland, 2011 ; Piqué-Noguera, 2012 ; Paré, 2017 ; Abdollahpour and Gholami, 2019 ; Anderson et al., 2021 ; Yu, 2021 ).

Moreover, genre referring to abstracts means socially known ways of using language. This is because writing practise is done to give the reader a chance to interpret what the reader could be expected based on what they have read in earlier texts ( Hyland, 2007 ). As Kaya and Yağız (2020) state, publishing research articles in English is the main aspect of academic life. Therefore, writing is a challenging job, and surviving in the academic world is demanding. Thus, it needs to be of good quality with all the features. However, if the writer has no awareness of what is required for writing and how to make it more interesting for the readers, the text written can turn into a disappointment. Belcher (2009) states that the abstract is an important part of work because it gives readers an idea of what it contains and whether it is worth reading. To put it simply, an abstract acts as a communication tool revealing the importance of the article and indicating whether reading the article will enrich scholars. Tanko (2017) claims that abstracts are the key tools to declare the outcomes researchers have found in their studies. Moreover, Salager-Meyer (1994) and Hartley (2003) define the abstract as the core of the article and the first part that encounters the readers of the article. For this reason, Hartley and Betts (2009) highlight the importance of abstracts by pointing out the fact that a well-written abstract increases the possibility of being read if it gives enough information about the article.

This study investigates and analyzes the M.A. and Ph.D. students’ theses abstracts written by EFL Turkish students in the ELT department. As we all know, abstracts are a very significant part of articles, and they are the main part of transferring and reporting the writer’s view. The major concern of this issue is probably the poor writing skills of students’. Since the demand for writing abstracts is increasing, it has become more important to focus on the structure of the information, make discourse and do a genre analysis. Therefore, problems that lie beneath this topic will be examined, analyzed, and solved.

This study aims to analyze how M.A. and Ph.D. students at Cyprus International University (CIU) write their thesis abstracts using a genre-based approach and Hyland’s framework for abstract analysis (2000). Specifically, the study aims to classify the patterns of the moves employed in the abstracts of CIU M.A. and Ph.D. theses, identify the obligatory and optional moves in the research abstracts, and determine the linguistic features, specifically the tense of the verb and the voice of the verb. Furthermore, it aims to classify the pattern of the rhetorical moves employed in the theses abstracts and determine the linguistic features used by the researchers regarding the following: (a) tense of the verb and (b) voice of the verb. The following research questions will be answered through the present study:

• (1) What are the genre-specific rhetorical features of the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?
• (2) What types of moves are there in the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?
• (3) What are the obligatory, conventional, and optional moves identified in the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?
• (4) What are the linguistic features of the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?

Theoretical Framework

Abstracts are the most important parts of research reports as they determine the value of the whole manuscript. Therefore, as Male (2018 : 24) states, “abstracts categorized as an academically written genre containing the rhetorical structure or moves”. Writing abstracts can be more challenging than writing the whole report for students or academicians since it requires an awareness of steps or organization. Furthermore, it has to be written systematically and in good organization. According to Othman (2011) , effective abstract writing can be ascribed to many factors. One of the aspects written is organization. Abstracts are important for the growth and prosperity of academics in all fields.

Considering the fact that the English language has become an international language used worldwide, it may carry some obstacles within itself for non-native speakers when they are writing their reports. Especially, when they want to convey their thoughts. This could be one of the reasons Hyland (2016) has pointed out why non-native speakers go through difficulties as the linguistic norms of the target language are different from their mother tongue. Similarly, Brown (2000) has stated that not only writing is a complicated activity but also one needs to have the full competencies.

According to Ren and Li (2011) , genre analysis has to be done to be able to write well or to overcome the challenges of academic writing. For this reason, Al-Zubaidi (2012) , recommended that second language learners’ should receive extra help in comprehending the content, building academic language, and incorporating language skills. Furthermore, Zhu (2004) ; Tardy (2005) , and Tas (2008) pointed out that in the process of writing academic manuscripts, appropriate style should be given in a discoursal environment. To overcome the writing difficulties in the native language and to develop effective academic writing skills studying the genre, analysis is the best.

Due to the fact that examiners or readers are very busy doing their work, most of them limit their search, and they want to know from the first glance whether the manuscript is worth reading or not ( Alhuqbani, 2013 ). For this reason, according to Kossasih (2018) , four reasons make abstracts play a vital role in articles. The first reason is, it gives information that can be easily read or seen. The second reason is that it can guide readers or provide them with a clue as to whether they will finish reading the whole content or not. Third, it gives an outline for readers. Fourth, it offers a summary of the most important ideas and thoughts. According to Walter (2008) , abstract means, “a shortened form of a speech, article, book, etc., giving only the most important facts or ideas.” Bhatia (1993) defined it as “a description or factual summary of the much longer report, and is meant to give the reader an exact and concise knowledge of the full article.”

Moreover, Martín-Martín (2005 : 20) claims that abstracts are written: “to provide the summary of the content of the accompanying article”. Consequently, they all suggest that research article writers should use a series of rhetorical strategies or move structures, and accordingly, there are some popular generic structures to mention. One of them is Bhatia (1993) , suggesting four-move generic structures of abstracts: (1) introducing the purpose, (2) describing the method, (3) summarizing the result, and (4) presenting the conclusion. Another one is proposed by Hyland (2004) , which has a five-move generic structure such as introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion moves. In parallel with these, Santos (1996) and Swales and Feak (2004) proposed a five-move generic structure that include (1) background, (2) aim, (3) method, (4) results, and (5) conclusion moves.

According to Kossasih (2018) , the abstract can be contemplated as a genre. Eggins maintains that “Genre is a staged, goal-oriented purposeful activity in which speakers or writers engage as members of our culture. Thus, recognizing the genre of a text has an important role in identifying ways in which a particular text is similar to, reminiscent of, other texts circulating in the culture” ( Eggins, 2004 : 45). Hence, if the genre of the text cannot be identified, it can be seen as problematic. According to Niu (2013) , the genre is a literary term, and genre analysis is a type of discourse that is believed to be done to check the consistency of communicative purposes. Therefore, it involves stylistic text analysis. Abstracts as genres have become an indispensable tool for researchers because it provides them with a chance to select the right article for their research ( Piqué-Noguera, 2012 ).

In 1990, Swales identified genre analysis as parts that constitute moves and linguistic features such as tense, reporting verbs, and the lexical frequency that help writers write a certain text. Thus, it focuses on ideas and meaning and has a sequence of moves that involves communicative function in each move. Therefore, according to his description and identification, all research articles should first identify the topic, then give a review of the previously written articles as the next move, and detect what is not present in the research reports written earlier as a second move, and state the outline of the goals of the study that has been carried out by writing a summary of the outcomes and stating the results as the last move ( Upton and Connor, 2001 ). In line with Upton and Connor (2001) , Ding describes the word move as, “A functional unit in a text, being related to the overall task, which is used to identify the textual regularities in certain genres of writing” ( Ding, 2007 , 20). Having read many articles on the topic, it has been noticed that many experts have defined the term “move analysis” differently. Yelland (2011: 12) defines move analysis as a “piece of text that is evident in the unified functional meaning of a sentence or group of sentences”. Swales (2004) defines it as a shaper of the overall communicative purpose and the rhetorical structure of the genre. El-Dakhs (2018) explains each move as steps. Moreover, some models have been put forward by Bhatia (1993) ; Santos (1996) , and Hyland (2000) . In Bhatia’s version, four moves have been explained, namely, introduction, method, results, and discussion, and this model has been named the IMRD model. In Santos (1996) suggested a new model and put forward five moves, namely, situating the research, presenting the research, describing the methodology, summarizing the findings, and discussing the findings. Finally, in 2000, Hyland gave the final version of the model of moves, which can be detected as similar to Santos’s model because Hyland’s version also included five moves and introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion made up the model. Figure 1 demonstrates the three different models that have been explained.

Research article abstracts move models ( El-Dakhs, 2018 ).

According to Can et al. (2016) , moves can be explained or defined as methods that can be used as a guide for the organizing the text to be written. Therefore, all these studies that have been carried out with the aim of evaluating the language of thesis abstracts are to offer different ways and methods of organizing and controlling the language of second language learners’ to prevent discrepancies for communicative purposes. Furthermore, Kanoksilapatham (2007) stated that the move analysis helps the information to be arranged and identifies the type of information that should be included in the text.

This study employs Hyland’s five-move model, examining the moves in thesis abstracts by CIU students. The results of this study can help non-native speakers in writing their abstracts and can contribute to the enrichment of literature in regards to the structure of moves. Moreover, the results are expected to provide deep insight for academicians to improve their writing skills in their future studies.

This study adopts a content analysis method to examine the rhetorical structure of English thesis abstracts. The corpus is the analysis of a total of 50 bachelor theses abstracts at Cyprus International University. The students were selected randomly. The analysis of thesis abstracts involves examining Hyland’s five-move models, which consist of introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion.

As shown in Table 1 , Hyland (2000) presents all five moves and their functions. We examined all moves and their functions sequentially in our analysis.

Hyland’s (2000) move model.

To examine abstracts more easily, all 50 abstracts were numbered separately. Hyland’s (2000) model was employed for the analysis. The reason for choosing this model is the fact that it includes five moves, namely, introduction, purpose, methods, product, and conclusion, and his model was used widely in many other research studies. Hyland’s model has been accepted as the most influential in addressing the rhetorical moves in abstracts compared to other suggested models by Santo and Bhatia. In the analysis of move, identification, occurrence, patterns, and the use of tense and voice of moves were also examined. Moreover, the analysis was based on the content or function of the text, and the frequency was used to classify the number of move occurrences in the abstracts. The frequency of occurrence was first recorded and then noted in the tables.

Table 2 lists the frequency of moves found in the abstracts, and as it can be seen from the table, purpose and method have the highest percentages, and conclusion has the lowest percentage. It also shows that only (20%) of these abstracts include complete Hyland’s five moves which are: introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion. It has been noticed that most English thesis abstracts (70%) comprised only four rhetorical moves with the absence of a conclusion move. It can be said that all abstracts did not have the conclusion move. The absence of some rhetorical moves in English thesis abstracts may cause communication problems with the readers. Moreover, the readers may have difficulty comprehending the text, and may fail to read it further. This may be a drawback for researchers if their research is not read and recognized in the academic community.

The frequency of moves found in the abstracts.

In Table 3 , the results for tense verb frequency in each move in the abstracts are presented. According to the results obtained, it can be seen that most of the moves in thesis abstracts were written in the present tense. The results showed that the present tense was used more than the past tense in the introduction, purpose, and conclusion in English abstracts. However, the past tense was used more with higher percentages in method and product move. It can also be seen that the future tense was only used in the conclusion move with a low percentage (12%), and it cannot be seen in the other moves.

Verb tense frequency in each move in the abstracts.

In Table 4 , the findings showed that the active voice was preferred in the introduction, purpose, product, and conclusion moves. Nevertheless, the passive voice was used in the method move with a higher percentage compared to the active voice. Furthermore, it is possible to say that a mixture of active and passive voices was used in all moves in the analyzed abstracts.

The voice used in the analyzed abstracts.

In the identification process of move analysis, the belief in rhetorical function was vital for the analysis of RA abstracts to investigate move frequency, move pattern, and the use of tense and voice. To ensure the reliability of this research, coding was used. The Kanoksilapatham’s (2015) criterion for the classification of the frequency of occurrence of each move was employed as the cut-off point.

As shown in Table 1 , all five moves related to Hyland’s (2000) model have been presented. In Table 2 , the frequency of each move differed slightly. The purpose move has been found to have the highest frequency and percentage (96%), followed by the method (92%), product (88%), introduction (74%), and conclusion moves (50%). According to the data obtained, the conclusion move with the least frequency and percentage was an optional move as it was not mentioned in most abstracts. Many researchers preferred not to include this move in their abstracts as this showed they did not give enough importance to it. However, the purpose, method, and product moves were similar in their frequency, but the introduction and conclusion moves seemed to be different, with the least occurring frequency and having the least percentages. The purpose move was the most dominant in all the abstracts that have been examined in this study. The high frequency found in the moves of purpose, method, and product implies that the researchers were aware of the importance of these three moves, whereas the least frequency found in the introduction and conclusion moves demonstrates that some researchers were not aware of the importance of establishing the context of the manuscript and motivating the research or discussion and interpreting or extending the results beyond the scope of the manuscript, drawing inferences, pointing to applications, or suggesting wider implications. The writers had a tendency to begin their abstracts with a purpose move and end the abstracts without drawing references to the field by providing no further suggestions on how to improve their studies in the future. This finding indicates that the writers of this corpus regard the background, method, and significance of the study as more important. Since there is no previously written similar research on this issue, this can be interpreted as the writers’ are lacking rhetorical knowledge on the other two moves (introduction and conclusion), or perhaps they do not attach any importance to mentioning them.

As shown in Table 3 , the most frequent verb tense in all the five moves was the present tense. However, the most frequent pattern can be seen in the purpose move with a percentage of 90%. Only in the method move past tense was more frequent with a percentage of 87%. The most frequent patterns were in introduction move (a) Pr-P, purpose move (b) Pr-P, method move (c) P-Pr, product move (d) P-Pr, and conclusion move (e) P-Pr-F. It can be seen that the present voice was the most frequently preferred structure, and only in the conclusion move, the future tense was preferred only in three abstracts among 50 manuscripts to give further implications on the study. According to Table 3 , in the introduction, purpose and conclusion moves present tense was used more frequently and to categorize this present simple and present continuous, and present perfect tenses were the most frequently seen. In the product move, the use of past tense was seen to be more than the present tense. Finally, in the conclusion move, from the findings, it can be understood that all tenses are used, including past, present, and future, however, the further findings reflect that the present tense was used more, followed by past and future tense. The differences in tenses usage and their frequency were in the method and product moves. There was no future tense used in the other moves, while 12% of the ELT abstracts were written in the future form. For the method move, only 13% of the abstracts were written in the present form, while 87% were written in the past tense. Thus, we can say that the most frequent tense used in most moves was present simple, while the past tense was the second most frequent and the future tense was found to be the least frequent in three abstracts only to present the conclusion move. However, other previous studies by Zhang et al. (2012) and Suntara and Usaha (2013) stated that the most dominant tense was the past tense in the studies they have carried out.

When our study is compared with other studies by Tseng (2011) and Alhuqbani (2013) , it has been found that they both included the same similarities and differences in tenses usage. This means that in the introduction, purpose, and conclusion moves, they tended to use the present simple tense, whereas in our study, introduction, purpose, product, and conclusion moves present tense was mostly used, but the method and product moves were different in the tense usage because past tense was used more which is similar to Alhuqbani’s and Tseng’s findings. Tseng found that in method and product moves, past tense usage was more dominant, which is similar to our findings. However, Zhang et al. (2012) suggested that in their findings, present tense was not seen in the method move in the abstracts he examined. This implies that there are variations in the methodology part of the writings of research manuscripts’ abstracts.

In Table 4 , the findings showed that in general, active voice usage was mostly used in all moves. Especially, in the purpose move, the active voice was used by 90% with the highest percentage, while the passive voice was used by 10%. The second most frequent choice was a mixture of active and passive voices that occurred in the method move. This was similar to Zhang et al. (2012) findings, which stated that active voice was more frequent than passive voice. On the contrary, Tu and Wang (2013) revealed that passive voice was the most frequently used in the RA abstracts they have examined. Moreover, Hanidar (2016) also mentioned that writers prefer to use the passive form more when they are presenting the procedure of their research and stating their findings. Nevertheless, in our findings, a combination of the active and passive voices was used, which indicates that most writers tend to develop their abstracts directly rather than using an indirect style. Only in the product move, the passive voice seem to be the least frequent with the lowest percentage (7%).

Although there have been a lot of studies conducted on abstract writing by both native and non-native speakers of English, my research is different from the previous studies due to the fact that only abstracts written by Turkish students were analyzed. The reason for conducting this research only on Turkish students is to identify strengths and weaknesses in the moves of the abstracts, as there is a wealth of literature available on native students. We believe that this study will contribute to the field, improve the current literature on the topic, and provide a significant step by examining the rhetorical structure of Turkish abstracts within the framework of Hyland’s (2000) five-move pattern. The findings of a study conducted by Çandarlı (2012) showed that all abstracts include the introduction move. The reason for this could be the move pattern he followed (IMRC), in which the purpose move had to be stated in the introduction move. In the study carried out by Al-Khasawneh (2017) , it was found that in the examined abstracts by native and non-native speakers of English, three moves (introduction, purpose, and product) were available, which implies that both abstract writers are aware of the importance of the moves in their abstracts. However, the only difference was detected in the abstracts of native writers because they included introduction and conclusion moves more than the non-natives. It is believed that this study can help students and novice writers, especially those from non-English backgrounds to facilitate their successful acculturation into their disciplinary community. Another study conducted by Çakır and Fidan (2015) is believed to raise students’ awareness and help them choose suitable moves to fulfill their aims. Moreover, it is believed that their study will have important implications for the future. The findings of a study done by Kaya and Yağız (2020) are assumed to help authors in this field be familiar with abstract writing conventions. Also, the results are believed to benefit the production of academic writing materials for scholars and academic writing courses. Since it is a comparative study, the results would help non-natives be aware of the conventions of academic writing and guide them throughout the process involved in global research. However, the results of Ashofteh et al. (2020) demonstrate that non-native speakers use more hedges and are more tentative in their abstracts which shows that they leave more space for opposing views in their claims. Furthermore, Saidi and Khazaei’s (2021) study is believed to be used in teaching academic writing to graduate students in English for academic purposes and to help them present their findings globally.

Generally, the authors’ aim in conducting research in this field is that they believe it will be beneficial for beginner writers. The suggestions and recommendations and the findings of the results will guide them to produce better academic reports by following the rules to develop writing skills. In this regard, it would be appropriate to say that this research is expected to provide similar pedagogical implications.

This study has been carried out to investigate the rhetorical structure of English RA abstracts in ELT theses. Five moves have been identified and analyzed. The present tense and active voice were the most chosen and frequently occurring. As a result of this, the past tense, present perfect tense, and passive voice were seldomly used. Moreover, the findings of this study are presented in a descriptive style since all the results are discussed. For this reason, the authors who will be writing manuscripts in the field of English language teaching should consider these findings and develop their abstracts accordingly. The benefit of this study would be to apply what is useful and needed for the implementation of pedagogical practice. Writing abstracts can be helpful for the development of teaching materials and thesis manuscripts, and with the correct guidance, non-native writers or graduate students who are in the process of developing their careers can be helped to solve their writing problems and organize their work in five moves. Moreover, these five moves would help the development of English abstracts for conference presentations or publications. It is believed that once writers gain a full understanding of grammatical and rhetorical features, they will be able to write their abstracts more effectively. Furthermore, the findings regarding the tense and voice usage presented in this study would be a guide to offer the limitations and drawbacks when writing abstracts. Thus, these restrictions should be considered when carrying out move analysis studies in the future. Peacock (2002) claims that move structures should be taught to non-native speakers and novice writers to help them to be able to write the abstract sections of their research correctly. However, this study is limited since it only focuses on one section, which is abstracts. Likely, another limitation of this study could be the small sample size due to its restriction to 50 abstracts, with the result that it can be generalized to all ELT thesis abstracts. Future studies can focus on the large scale of samples, considering all the suggestions and recommendations made in this research.

Data Availability Statement

Author contributions.

SS and BM contributed equally to the manuscript generation, writing process, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

• Abdollahpour Z., Gholami J. (2019). Embodiment of rhetorical moves in lexical bundles in abstracts of the medical sciences. S. Afr. Linguist. Appl. Lang. Stud. 37 339–360. 10.2989/16073614.2019.1692681 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Alhuqbani M. N. (2013). Genre-based analysis of Arabic research article abstracts across four disciplines. J. Educ. Soc. Res. 3 371–382. 10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p371 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Al-Khasawneh F. M. (2017). A genre analysis of research article abstracts written by native and non-native speakers of English. J. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Res. 4 1–13. [ Google Scholar ]
• Al-Zubaidi K. O. (2012). Academic writing of Arab postgraduate students: discussing the main language issues. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 66 46–52. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.246 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Anderson T., Saunders G., Alexander I. (2021). Alternative dissertation formats in education based doctorates. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 41 593–612. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1867513 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ashofteh Z., Elahi Shirvan M., Golparvar S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 16 2077–2096. 10.17263/jlls.851035 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Belcher W. L. (2009). Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhatia V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown H. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching , 4th Edn. New York, NY: Longman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Çakır H., Fidan Ö. (2015). “ A contrastive study of the rhetorical structure of Turkish and English research article abstracts ,” in Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics , eds Zeyrek D., Sagin Simsek C., Atas U., Rehbein J. (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag; ), 367–378. 10.2307/j.ctvc770nr.36 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Can S., Karabacak E., Qin J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications 4 : 23 . 10.3390/publications4030023 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Çandarlı D. (2012). A cross-cultural investigation of English and Turkish research article abstracts in educational sciences. Stud. About Lang. 20 12–17. 10.5755/j01.sal.0.20.1770 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen Y., Su S. (2011). A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT J. 6 184–192. 10.1093/elt/ccr061 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ding H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. Engl. Specif. Purp. 26 368–392. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eggins S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 2nd Edn. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. [ Google Scholar ]
• El-Dakhs D. A. S. (2018). Comparative genre analysis of research article abstracts in more and less prestigious journals: linguistics journals in focus. Res. Lang. 16 47–63. 10.2478/rela-2018-0002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hanidar S. (2016). Rhetorical patterns, verb tenses, and voice in cross disciplinary research article abstracts. Humaniora 28 12–27. 10.22146/jh.v28i1.11410 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hartley J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: the case for structure. Sci. Commun. 24 366–379. 10.1177/1075547002250301 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hartley J., Betts L. (2009). Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60 2010–2018. 10.1002/asi.21102 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23927 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. J. Second Lang. Writ. 16 148–164. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. J. Second Lang. Writ. 31 58–69. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kanoksilapatham B. (2007). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. Engl. Specif. Purp. 24 269–292. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kanoksilapatham B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterising structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. Engl. Specif. Purp. 37 74–86. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kaya F., Yağız O. (2020). Move analysis of research article abstracts in the field of ELT: a comparative study. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 16 390–404. 10.17263/jlls.712854 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kossasih F. R. (2018). A genre analysis of thesis abstracts at a State University in Banten. Lingua Cult. 12 9–14. 10.21512/lc.v12i1.1963 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Male H. (2018). A structural move analysis of abstracts in undergraduate theses: a case study at Universitas Kristen Indonesia. KnE Soc. Sci. 3 284–294. 10.18502/kss.v3i9.2690 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martín-Martín P. (2005). The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse: A Crosscultural Genre-Analytic Approach , Vol. 21 . Bern: Peter Lang. [ Google Scholar ]
• Niu G. (2013). “ A genre analysis of Chinese and English abstracts of academic journal articles: a parallel-corpus-based study ,” in Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Vol. 8229 eds Liu P., Su Q. (Berlin: Springer; ), 603–616. 10.1007/978-3-642-45185-0_63 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Othman A. (2011). Genre Analysis: An Investigation of MA Dissertation Abstracts. Ph.D. dissertation. Wad Madani: University of Gezira. [ Google Scholar ]
• Paré A. (2017). Re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision/reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervisión. Infanc. Aprendizaje 40 407–428. 10.1080/02103702.2017.1341102 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Peacock M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30 479–497. 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Piqué-Noguera C. (2012). Writing business research article abstracts: a genre approach. Iberica 24 211–232. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ren H., Li Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. Engl. Lang. Teach. 4 162–166. 10.5539/elt.v4n1p162 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Saidi M., Khazaei Z. (2021). Genre analysis of research article abstracts in applied linguistics: exploring sub-disciplinary variations. Int. J. Engl. Lang. Transl. Stud. 9 34–40. 10.1155/2021/3578179 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salager-Meyer F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English 13 149–171. 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Santos M. B. D. (1996). The textual organisation of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text 16 481–499. 10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suntara W., Usaha S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. Engl. Lang. Teach. 6 84–99. 10.5539/elt.v6n2p84 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Swales J. (2004). Research Genres Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Swales J. M., Feak C. B. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills , Vol. 1 . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tanko G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: an analysis of rhetorical. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 27 42–55. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tardy C. M. (2005). “It’s like a story” rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 4 325–338. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tas E. E. I. (2008). A Corpus-Based Analysis of Genre-Specific Discourse of Research: The PhD thesis and the Research Article in ELT . Doctoral dissertation. Çankaya: Middle East Technical University. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tseng F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tenses of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. Int. J. Engl. Linguist. 1 27–39. 10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tu P. N., Wang S. P. (2013). “ Corpus-based research on tense analysis and rhetorical structure in journal article abstracts ,” in Paper Presented at the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC 27) (Taipei: National Chengchi University; ). [ Google Scholar ]
• Upton T., Connor U. (2001). Using computerised corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. Engl. Specif. Purp. 20 313–329. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00022-3 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Walter E. (2008). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary Hardback with CD-ROM for Windows and Mac Klett Edition. Deutchland: Ernst Klett Sprachen. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yelland C. (2011). A genre and move analysis of written feedback in higher education. Lang. Lit. 20 218–235. 10.1177/0963947011413563 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu S. (2021). Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 46 36–53. 10.1080/02602938.2020.1742872 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang B., Thuc Q. B. T., Pramoolsook I. (2012). Moves and linguistic realisations: English research article abstracts by Vietnamese agricultural researchers. Asian ESP J. 8 126–149. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. J. Second Lang. Writ. 13 29–48. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• Research and Innovation
• News and events
• Loughborough Doctoral College
• University home
• Essential information
• Code of Practice on Research Degree Programmes

10. Presentation by alternative thesis format

Guidance for presenting a thesis in one of the alternative formats.

This route can be used when submitting for the award of PhD as defined under section 3.1 of Regulation XXVI.

10.1 Choosing between a standard and alternative thesis format

When considering an alternative format thesis submission the first step is to discuss this with your supervisory team.

A thesis in alternative format includes chapters that are in the format of a scholarly journal article, stand-alone book chapter, or similar scholarly materials prepared for publication (hereafter collectively referred to as ‘papers’). These can be published papers, submitted papers, or drafts that are written as potential papers but have not yet been submitted for publication. Apart from the inclusion of such materials, the alternative format thesis must conform to the same standards expected for a standard thesis.

Any work submitted within the alternative format thesis must be substantially different from any work which may have previously been submitted for any degree at this or any other institution. The thesis must be based on original research undertaken as part of the doctoral research degree which contribute to a Loughborough degree. This will normally mean research undertaken after the registration date on the research degree programme at Loughborough.

The thesis should represent a contribution to knowledge and contain original work worthy of publication. It should also provide evidence of training in and application of research methods appropriate to the particular field of study. The full criteria for a PhD are set out in paragraph 11.2 of Regulation XXVI.

As with standard doctoral theses, examiners should satisfy themselves that the alternative format thesis meets the requirement of the doctoral degree as prescribed in the appropriate regulations and policies. The fact that a thesis contains material that has been published or accepted for publication does not guarantee that the examiner will recommend the award for which the candidate is being examined. The examiners are entitled to examine the doctoral researcher on any part of the thesis, and to specify revisions to any part of the thesis text presented for examination, including those parts already published or accepted for publication.

The alternative format is not normally available for initial submissions for the degree of MPhil. However, a PhD thesis originally submitted in the alternative format should remain in that format if the examiners decide it does not meet the PhD criteria but it may be resubmitted for the award of MPhil. Exceptionally, where a doctoral researcher has been planning to submit in the alternative format but their personal circumstances change and they decide to submit for an MPhil, their submission may be made in the alternative format.

10.2 Approval for submission in alternative format

In order to submit a thesis in alternative format you should have the approval of your supervisors and the Director of Doctoral Programmes.

• If you wish to adopt this format, the primary supervisor should contact the DDP to ensure the model agreed with doctoral researchers is appropriate.
• Schools will set out in their own guidance the expected timescales for discussion and agreement of the use of the alternative format and you should check this guidance carefully.
• The School guidance will indicate when the format must be agreed and this will be no later than the R2 review.
• The format of the thesis should be discussed at the earliest opportunity and Schools may require such discussions to be before the 6-month review. Intention to use this format should be recorded by the primary supervisor and doctoral researcher in relevant progress reports as stipulated by the School.
• Format switches are allowed only in truly exceptional circumstances.
• Doctoral researchers are strongly advised not to use registration time to rewrite material from one format into another. Later decisions to change the thesis format would not be sufficient cause to warrant an extension to registration for rewriting purposes.
• Supervisors should confirm the format with potential external Examiners, in writing via email, before the latter agree to serve as external Examiners.

10.3 Structure

The supervisors are best placed to advise on how to structure a thesis in alternative format.

• The work must constitute a body of publications tending towards a coherent and continuous thesis, rather than a series of disconnected publications. The thesis should reflect the quantity, quality and originality of research and analysis expected of a candidate submitting a standard thesis outlined in 9.3. The thesis must satisfy the following criteria:
• The number of papers included in the alternative format thesis may vary according to discipline, but should reflect the quantity, quality and originality of research and analysis expected of a candidate submitting a standard thesis. It should normally be a minimum of three papers.
• The supervisor and doctoral researcher need to agree on the number of papers that will be included, and this must be recorded in your progress reports.
• an account of how the thesis has been constructed, including identification of chapters that are published or in publishable format;
• an explanation of how all the papers fit together into a coherent and continuous thesis.
• A detailed and critical analysis of the methods used, which may be in a separate chapter if the papers formatted for publication do not include this level of detail.
• A summary of the research findings in the preceding papers/chapters and critical analysis of their relation to state-of-the-art research within the subject area.
• An amalgamation of the discrete conclusions of the individual papers/chapters that explores the overall significance of the work and its contribution to the field.
• Preliminary and background data supporting one or more of the papers may be incorporated into the thesis as commentary text accompanying the chapter.
• Research findings not written into an academic paper may be incorporated into the thesis as a conventional results chapter.
• As with any co-authored work for any thesis format, the doctoral researcher must certify in writing the extent to which the submission is their own work and in each case in which there has been cooperative effort the nature and extent of that effort must be fully specified.
• It is expected that the doctoral researcher will have undertaken the major role in ALL aspects of the work (data collection and analysis, writing, etc) as explained in introductory chapter.
• As each academic paper will have self-contained components that may overlap with other sections of the thesis, there may be some duplication of material.
• The thesis should reflect the quantity, quality and originality of research and analysis expected of a candidate submitting a standard thesis.
• The thesis should normally not exceed 80,000 words.

10.4 Formatting

Accepted manuscripts of papers should be stylistically integrated into the thesis, matching typeface, margins, and pagination. The manuscript of any papers intended for future publication and currently in draft form should be treated in the same manner.

Journal-formatted published papers may be included in the thesis if approved by the copyright holder. Where possible, the doctoral researcher should alter the page numbers to align with the main document. Where this is not possible, a sheet of A4 may be placed before each published paper, on which is displayed the publication title and the thesis page numbers that it spans.

10.5 Attribution

You can include co-authored papers in an alternative format thesis submission, including those written alongside another doctoral researcher but the substantial part must be your original work and it is expected that you will be the first author on the submitted/published papers – please check this with your supervisors. In your introductory chapter, you need to clearly outline what major contribution you made to all aspects of the work: data collection and analysis, writing of the paper, etc.

10.6 Copyright

Where a thesis contains third party copyright material the student must obtain permission for its publication, including on the Internet via the University’s Research Repository. If the student is unable to obtain permission for the use of substantial copyright material, then an indefinite moratorium of the thesis can be applied. Where a student is unable to obtain permission for use of a limited range of copyright material, then the electronic copy of the thesis can be submitted in two versions, a full version with a moratorium on publication and a second version without the third-party copyright material (maintaining the original pagination) which will be placed on open access.

10.7 Inclusion of material that has already been published

The guidance below specifically refers to the e-thesis that will be deposited into the University’s Research Repository, rather than the examination version. The examination version is the complete version that is submitted and distributed to Examiners solely for the purpose of examination. The inclusion of copyright protected material for the examination version is covered by ‘illustration for instruction’ section 32 CDPA, which includes copying for examination and is subject to fair dealing. The e-thesis, deposited into the Research Repository, is not necessarily covered by this exception. Please consult the Copyright Advisors if you require more detailed information or see the Copyright Guidance website .

Copyright for published material will usually be held by the publisher or authors. The doctoral researcher is responsible for obtaining the necessary permission from the copyright owners to include the material in the thesis. Please check with the publisher and/or any copyright holders to ascertain which version of an article or book chapter is permitted to be included in the e-thesis; the version is usually either the author-created final version or the journal formatted version. For co-authored papers included, permission should be sought from co-authors, as well as the publisher, if appropriate. Even if the copyright has transferred to the publisher, it is good academic practice to make all contributors aware that the paper is going to be included in a thesis, although it is not necessary in copyright terms.

There is example wording for a publication request below and the doctoral researcher must keep a copy of the response granting this request.

Example wording for letter to a publisher:

Dear X, I am a doctoral researcher at Loughborough University, writing my PhD thesis by alternative format. I am the author of the following article(s) published by you and would like permission to include them in my e-thesis: [Insert full reference for the work/s]. The e-thesis will be made publicly available on the University’s research repository. All works will be appropriately referenced within the thesis. Can you please let me know if it is possible to reproduce these articles in this way and if there are any conditions associated with their reuse?

Some publishers have a policy that specifically states that publishing as part of a PhD is not considered prior publication, but there are some exceptions. Doctoral researchers are advised to carefully consider including any pending publications in their thesis, and to inform the journal/book editor that a draft form of the text is included in the thesis and that the e-thesis will be (or has been) made available on the publicly available University research repository. If the publishers are unwilling to publish work with this condition, it is possible to place restrictions on the availability of the e-thesis or on this section of the e-thesis on the research repository (e.g. a moratorium or embargo).

Doctoral College (Academic Registry)

For administrative queries about your phd.

Tel: 01509 228292

Email: Send email

Location: Student Enquiries, Rutland Building

© 2023 Loughborough University. All rights reserved.

• GENERAL HUMANITIES PRESS RELEASES
• Methodology
• Editorial team
• Publication guidelines

Theses and dissertations: pros and cons of the traditional and alternative formats

By Lilian Nassi-Calò

Photo: Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) .

Scholarly communication undergoes changes and evolves as science itself. The scientific article, its format and publication mode, dissemination and sharing has undergone significant changes since the emergence of the first scientific journals in the seventeenth century. The Internet, in the 1990s, dramatically changed the paradigm of science communication, an event comparable only to the invention of printing by Gutenberg in 1440, which enabled the dissemination of articles and journals to other instances, beyond the academy.

Dissertations and theses are monographs that constitute elements of scientific communication, but their primary role is to demonstrate that the candidate of an academic title is able to drive and communicate independent and original research.

The July 7, 2016 editorial of Nature 1 brings peculiar information, “According to one of those often-quoted statistics that should be true but probably isn’t, the average number of people who read a PhD thesis all the way through is 1.6. And that includes the author”. The text goes on questioning what would be the number of theses that the typical researcher – and reader of Nature – has read in full. According to the same editorial, it possibly would not reach the 1.6 benchmark. The volume of theses, however, will continue to increase, since thousands of masters and PhD candidates in the world will face this rite of passage that is the gateway to the academic world or the professional market. The theses and dissertations database of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), an agency of the Ministry of Education of Brazil, registers 901,096 documents from 1987 to August 2016.

Given this scenario, all stand to gain if the theses and dissertations are concise and objective. Information from the largest doctoral theses database, ProQuest, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, indicates that the average number of pages of a thesis increased from about 100 in the 1950s to around 200 currently, a fact mentioned in Julie Gold’s paper in Nature 2 . Obviously, the number of pages is not proportional to the quality and originality of the work, however, despite this, it is difficult to educate students to reduce the theses’ volume, which would make them easier to write, read and appraise.

If the thesis itself has a similar structure in many countries, there is great diversity in the way it is evaluated and the candidate is argued. The thesis defence or viva voce (in Latin) has different forms in the countries. In the Netherlands, the defence has several examiners and includes a brief presentation of the work by the applicant, being open to the public. In Australia, the printed volume of the thesis is sent to the examiners who make comments in writing and return it to the candidate. He or she will make a presentation later, but this will not influence the final result. In Brazil, there are institutions that conduct thesis defences open to the public; others do a private session that includes only the candidate, the supervisor and a panel of examiners.

In order to expedite the writing and assessment of the thesis, institutions and graduate programs in several countries, including Brazil, are opting to allow candidates who have published articles on their masters or doctorate research, to replace some of the thesis chapters by these articles, headed by an introduction, conclusion and a review of the scientific literature. The criteria to judge which articles can replace the wording of the thesis is in charge of the graduate programs coordination. CAPES, the body that assesses graduate courses throughout Brazil, recognizes this modality of theses, as well as FAPESP and Research Foundations from other states, for scholarship and grant purposes. The fact that the candidate has published papers in well evaluated journals, however, does not exempt the dissertation or thesis defence, which must take place in accordance to the criteria established by the higher education institution.

Table 1, which is not exhaustive, includes graduate programs in Brazil that specifically allow the option of alternative thesis format in the norms of graduate programs. Interestingly, major universities leave the discretion of each program the adoption of this thesis format, since there are significant differences between the areas of knowledge with regard to publication in scientific journals. The University of São Paulo, for example, provides the graduate programs to set the format in which the dissertation / thesis shall be presented, through Article 90 of Resolution 6875 of August 6, 2014 of the Graduate Regiment 3 . It is known that the areas of Natural Sciences generate more publications than the Social Sciences and Humanities, where the publication of books and book chapters often exceeds that of journal articles. The areas of Computer Science and Engineering have as an important dissemination channel of research results conference proceedings and technical manuals.

This modality is favorably viewed by researchers and students, as it stimulates the publication of articles, and is less laborious than writing a 200 page thesis. Not that publishing journal articles is an easy task, far from it. The academic community, particularly from developing countries, makes a significant effort to write and publish articles – especially in English – in quality journals. But if the papers are published during the masters or doctorate research, it avoids employing valuable time in writing a traditional style thesis.

The importance of the topic was evidenced by a workshop organized by the Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA) in Melbourne in January 2016. The meeting aimed at the reform of the thesis format as part of the review process of research training, which is the main purpose of the master’s and doctoral programs. Shirley Tilghman, a molecular biologist and former president of Princeton University in New Jersey, USA, however, is not in favor of adopting the alternative format of theses, because “they demonstrate the candidate’s ability to frame the historical context of a problem, describe in detail the purpose and execution and then come to a credible conclusion”.

At the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, most of the theses are a compilation of articles published by students followed by a discussion, in a 50 page volume in total. In the view of the leaders of this institution, the publication should be an important part of master’s and doctorate academic training, since it enables candidates to enter the research career. Others, however, such as Jeremy Farrar, research director of Biomedicine at Wellcome Trust in London, UK, fear that the emphasis on article publishing during postgraduate studies would limit the focus of the doctorate to a mere paper factory. Moreover, the time for writing, submitting and peer reviewing articles may not coincide with the deadlines for presentation and defence of the thesis. In this sense, it is extremely timely the comment by Joy Burrough-Boenisch from Renkum, The Netherlands 4 . He advises to inform editors and peer reviewers, and even language professionals, that this particular article will be evaluated as part of obtaining an academic title, which may influence the time and in the way peer review is conducted.

Anyway, supporters or not of the alternative format agree that articles are most read and cited, and theses that remain only on library shelves and are not read or consulted have no reason to be. However, many researchers state their theses written over 20 years ago are still read and consulted by students and newly entered researchers in their laboratories. The Nature editorial 1 that discusses the thesis format seems to capture the candidates’ feeling by saying that “students in the process of writing a thesis are in a very dark place indeed: lost in information, overwhelmed by literature, stuck for the next sentence, seduced by procrastination and wondering why on earth they signed up to this torture at all”.

Whatever the format of the thesis, the assessment by a panel of examiners is paramount for granting the title. In Israel, for example, defence is optional, and few students choose to go through it. As noted above, in The Netherlands it is a formal and open procedure, while in the UK, it is an event reserved only to the candidate and the examiners. In Australia, mainly for logistical and costs reasons, there is no proper defence, the thesis is only given to the examiners, who return it with comments. Moreover, the supporters of this process claim that oral defence rarely changes the outcome of the doctorate. In fact, institutions prefer not to reduce the number of doctors and masters, which weigh positively on university rankings. Moreover, it is really unlikely that a candidate who has gone through the entire process – assuming that there are effective mechanisms along the way – end up failing the final step – the thesis defence. Anyway, it is worth mentioning that a single model will not serve to different countries, institutions and areas of knowledge.

As for the evaluation of the candidate to an academic title it is worth mentioning Tilghman, who claims to be “only possible to really evaluate a student at the 25 year reunion. In the end, the only way you can assess it whether the graduates of the program became successful scientists. If they do, you’ve done a good job. If they haven’t, you haven’t”.

Table 1. Graduate programs that allow Masters and PhD candidates to gather scientific papers as a substitute of the traditional thesis or dissertation.

1. The past, present and future of the PhD thesis. Nature . 2016, vol. 535, nº 7610, pp. 7-7. DOI: 10.1038/535007a

2. GOLD, J. What’s the point of the PhD thesis? Nature. 2016, vol. 535, nº 7610, pp. 26-28. DOI: 10.1038/535026a

3. Resolução CoPGr 6875, de 06 de Agosto de 2014. Universidade de São Paulo. 2014. Available from: http://www.leginf.usp.br/?resolucao=resolucao-copgr-6875-de-06-de-agosto-de-2014

4. BURROUGH-BOENISCH, J. PhD thesis: Being more open about PhD papers. Nature . 2016, vol. 536, nº 7616, pp. 274-274. DOI: 10.1038/536274b

BURROUGH-BOENISCH, J. PhD thesis: Being more open about PhD papers. Nature . 2016, vol. 536, nº 7616, pp. 274-274. DOI: 10.1038/536274b

GOLD, J. What’s the point of the PhD thesis? Nature. 2016, vol. 535, nº 7610, pp. 26-28. DOI: 10.1038/535026a

Resolução CoPGr 6875, de 06 de Agosto de 2014. Universidade de São Paulo. 2014. Available from: http://www.leginf.usp.br/?resolucao=resolucao-copgr-6875-de-06-de-agosto-de-2014

The past, present and future of the PhD thesis. Nature . 2016, vol. 535, nº 7610, pp. 7-7. DOI: 10.1038/535007a

External links

ACOLA – < http://www.acola.org.au/ >

Banco de Testes – < http://bancodeteses.capes.gov.br/banco-teses >

CAPES – < http://www.capes.gov.br/ >

FAPESP – < http://www.fapesp.br/ >

ProQuest database – < http://www.proquest.com/libraries/academic/databases/ >

About Lilian Nassi-Calò

Lilian Nassi-Calò studied chemistry at Instituto de Química – USP, holds a doctorate in Biochemistry by the same institution and a post-doctorate as an Alexander von Humboldt fellow in Wuerzburg, Germany. After her studies, she was a professor and researcher at IQ-USP. She also worked as an industrial chemist and presently she is Coordinator of Scientific Communication at BIREME/PAHO/WHO and a collaborator of SciELO.

Translated from the original in portuguese  by Lilian Nassi-Calò.

6 Thoughts on “ Theses and dissertations: pros and cons of the traditional and alternative formats ”

Read the comment in Spanish, by Javier Santovenia Diaz:

http://blog.scielo.org/es/2016/08/24/tesis-y-disertaciones-pros-y-contras-de-los-formatos-tradicionales-y-alternativos/#comment-39713

Read the comment in portuguese, by Milena Polsinelli:

http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2016/08/24/teses-e-dissertacoes-pros-e-contras-dos-formatos-tradicional-e-alternativo/#comment-24357

Read the comment in Portuguese, by Suzana Cavenaghi:

http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2016/08/24/teses-e-dissertacoes-pros-e-contras-dos-formatos-tradicional-e-alternativo/#comment-24426

Read the comment in Portuguese, by Moysés Kuhlmann Jr.:

http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2016/08/24/teses-e-dissertacoes-pros-e-contras-dos-formatos-tradicional-e-alternativo/#comment-24456

Pingback: Akademik değerlendirmede sözlü savunmanın alternatifleri

Pingback: And What Will You Do with That? A Quick, Dirty, and Incomplete Guide to Alternative Dissertations – Fabric Thinking

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Post Navigation

SciELO Network

Press Releases

• Functional foods containing probiotics are innovative and offer health benefits September 20, 2024 Ciência Rural
• Active surveillance is cheaper than immediate surgery in low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma September 13, 2024 Daniela Barros
• Editorial policies for inclusion and diversity in the Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença September 6, 2024 Ana Wegner
• Metamorphosis, friction or symbiosis between body and animated forms in the work of Ilka Schönbein September 4, 2024 Ana Wegner
• Performing Arts research highlighted on the blog “SciELO in Perspective” September 2, 2024 Rafaella Uhiara

Recent Posts

• New tool to assess equity in scholarly communication models
• Editorial policies for inclusion and diversity in the Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença
• Art as a Vehicle and Jerzy Grotowski’s Investigations Beyond the 20th Century
• Metamorphosis, friction or symbiosis between body and animated forms in the work of Ilka Schönbein
• Presence as a field of research in the performing arts

Recent Comments

• Nota de pesar: Charles Pessanha - anpocs.org.br on Interview and Tribute to Charles Pessanha [Originally published in DADOS’ blog in January/2020]
• Pesquisa da Pesquisa e Inovação on The use of research metrics is diversified in the Leiden Manifesto
• Pesquisa da Pesquisa organizará sessão especial em uma das maiores conferências sobre indicadores de CTI do mundo – Pesquisa da Pesquisa e Inovação on The use of research metrics is diversified in the Leiden Manifesto
• SciELO to Celebrate 25 Years with Series of Events - Public Knowledge Project on SciELO 25 Years: Open Science with IDEIA – Impact, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
• Como aumentar a divulgação da produção científica e das revistas acadêmicas - ABCD - Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais on Why XML?

The posts are of the authors responsibility and don't necessarily convey the opinions of the SciELO Program.

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online FAPESP - CAPES - CNPq - BIREME - FapUNIFESP http://www.scielo.org [email protected]

Home News Analysis Interviews Documents Newsletter About