objectives of the study in research example quantitative

21 Research Objectives Examples (Copy and Paste)

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

Research objectives refer to the definitive statements made by researchers at the beginning of a research project detailing exactly what a research project aims to achieve.

These objectives are explicit goals clearly and concisely projected by the researcher to present a clear intention or course of action for his or her qualitative or quantitative study. 

Research objectives are typically nested under one overarching research aim. The objectives are the steps you’ll need to take in order to achieve the aim (see the examples below, for example, which demonstrate an aim followed by 3 objectives, which is what I recommend to my research students).

Research Objectives vs Research Aims

Research aim and research objectives are fundamental constituents of any study, fitting together like two pieces of the same puzzle.

The ‘research aim’ describes the overarching goal or purpose of the study (Kumar, 2019). This is usually a broad, high-level purpose statement, summing up the central question that the research intends to answer.

Example of an Overarching Research Aim:

“The aim of this study is to explore the impact of climate change on crop productivity.” 

Comparatively, ‘research objectives’ are concrete goals that underpin the research aim, providing stepwise actions to achieve the aim.

Objectives break the primary aim into manageable, focused pieces, and are usually characterized as being more specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

Examples of Specific Research Objectives:

1. “To examine the effects of rising temperatures on the yield of rice crops during the upcoming growth season.” 2. “To assess changes in rainfall patterns in major agricultural regions over the first decade of the twenty-first century (2000-2010).” 3. “To analyze the impact of changing weather patterns on crop diseases within the same timeframe.”

The distinction between these two terms, though subtle, is significant for successfully conducting a study. The research aim provides the study with direction, while the research objectives set the path to achieving this aim, thereby ensuring the study’s efficiency and effectiveness.

How to Write Research Objectives

I usually recommend to my students that they use the SMART framework to create their research objectives.

SMART is an acronym standing for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. It provides a clear method of defining solid research objectives and helps students know where to start in writing their objectives (Locke & Latham, 2013).

Each element of this acronym adds a distinct dimension to the framework, aiding in the creation of comprehensive, well-delineated objectives.

Here is each step:

• Specific : We need to avoid ambiguity in our objectives. They need to be clear and precise (Doran, 1981). For instance, rather than stating the objective as “to study the effects of social media,” a more focused detail would be “to examine the effects of social media use (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) on the academic performance of college students.”
• Measurable: The measurable attribute provides a clear criterion to determine if the objective has been met (Locke & Latham, 2013). A quantifiable element, such as a percentage or a number, adds a measurable quality. For example, “to increase response rate to the annual customer survey by 10%,” makes it easier to ascertain achievement.
• Achievable: The achievable aspect encourages researchers to craft realistic objectives, resembling a self-check mechanism to ensure the objectives align with the scope and resources at disposal (Doran, 1981). For example, “to interview 25 participants selected randomly from a population of 100” is an attainable objective as long as the researcher has access to these participants.
• Relevance : Relevance, the fourth element, compels the researcher to tailor the objectives in alignment with overarching goals of the study (Locke & Latham, 2013). This is extremely important – each objective must help you meet your overall one-sentence ‘aim’ in your study.
• Time-Bound: Lastly, the time-bound element fosters a sense of urgency and prioritization, preventing procrastination and enhancing productivity (Doran, 1981). “To analyze the effect of laptop use in lectures on student engagement over the course of two semesters this year” expresses a clear deadline, thus serving as a motivator for timely completion.

You’re not expected to fit every single element of the SMART framework in one objective, but across your objectives, try to touch on each of the five components.

Research Objectives Examples

1. Field: Psychology

Aim: To explore the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in college students.

• Objective 1: To compare cognitive test scores of students with less than six hours of sleep and those with 8 or more hours of sleep.
• Objective 2: To investigate the relationship between class grades and reported sleep duration.
• Objective 3: To survey student perceptions and experiences on how sleep deprivation affects their cognitive capabilities.

2. Field: Environmental Science

Aim: To understand the effects of urban green spaces on human well-being in a metropolitan city.

• Objective 1: To assess the physical and mental health benefits of regular exposure to urban green spaces.
• Objective 2: To evaluate the social impacts of urban green spaces on community interactions.
• Objective 3: To examine patterns of use for different types of urban green spaces. 

3. Field: Technology

Aim: To investigate the influence of using social media on productivity in the workplace.

• Objective 1: To measure the amount of time spent on social media during work hours.
• Objective 2: To evaluate the perceived impact of social media use on task completion and work efficiency.
• Objective 3: To explore whether company policies on social media usage correlate with different patterns of productivity.

4. Field: Education

Aim: To examine the effectiveness of online vs traditional face-to-face learning on student engagement and achievement.

• Objective 1: To compare student grades between the groups exposed to online and traditional face-to-face learning.
• Objective 2: To assess student engagement levels in both learning environments.
• Objective 3: To collate student perceptions and preferences regarding both learning methods.

5. Field: Health

Aim: To determine the impact of a Mediterranean diet on cardiac health among adults over 50.

• Objective 1: To assess changes in cardiovascular health metrics after following a Mediterranean diet for six months.
• Objective 2: To compare these health metrics with a similar group who follow their regular diet.
• Objective 3: To document participants’ experiences and adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

6. Field: Environmental Science

Aim: To analyze the impact of urban farming on community sustainability.

• Objective 1: To document the types and quantity of food produced through urban farming initiatives.
• Objective 2: To assess the effect of urban farming on local communities’ access to fresh produce.
• Objective 3: To examine the social dynamics and cooperative relationships in the creating and maintaining of urban farms.

7. Field: Sociology

Aim: To investigate the influence of home offices on work-life balance during remote work.

• Objective 1: To survey remote workers on their perceptions of work-life balance since setting up home offices.
• Objective 2: To conduct an observational study of daily work routines and family interactions in a home office setting.
• Objective 3: To assess the correlation, if any, between physical boundaries of workspaces and mental boundaries for work in the home setting.

8. Field: Economics

Aim: To evaluate the effects of minimum wage increases on small businesses.

• Objective 1: To analyze cost structures, pricing changes, and profitability of small businesses before and after minimum wage increases.
• Objective 2: To survey small business owners on the strategies they employ to navigate minimum wage increases.
• Objective 3: To examine employment trends in small businesses in response to wage increase legislation.

9. Field: Education

Aim: To explore the role of extracurricular activities in promoting soft skills among high school students.

• Objective 1: To assess the variety of soft skills developed through different types of extracurricular activities.
• Objective 2: To compare self-reported soft skills between students who participate in extracurricular activities and those who do not.
• Objective 3: To investigate the teachers’ perspectives on the contribution of extracurricular activities to students’ skill development.

10. Field: Technology

Aim: To assess the impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on the tourism industry.

• Objective 1: To document the types and popularity of VR experiences available in the tourism market.
• Objective 2: To survey tourists on their interest levels and satisfaction rates with VR tourism experiences.
• Objective 3: To determine whether VR tourism experiences correlate with increased interest in real-life travel to the simulated destinations.

11. Field: Biochemistry

Aim: To examine the role of antioxidants in preventing cellular damage.

• Objective 1: To identify the types and quantities of antioxidants in common fruits and vegetables.
• Objective 2: To determine the effects of various antioxidants on free radical neutralization in controlled lab tests.
• Objective 3: To investigate potential beneficial impacts of antioxidant-rich diets on long-term cellular health.

12. Field: Linguistics

Aim: To determine the influence of early exposure to multiple languages on cognitive development in children.

• Objective 1: To assess cognitive development milestones in monolingual and multilingual children.
• Objective 2: To document the number and intensity of language exposures for each group in the study.
• Objective 3: To investigate the specific cognitive advantages, if any, enjoyed by multilingual children.

13. Field: Art History

Aim: To explore the impact of the Renaissance period on modern-day art trends.

• Objective 1: To identify key characteristics and styles of Renaissance art.
• Objective 2: To analyze modern art pieces for the influence of the Renaissance style.
• Objective 3: To survey modern-day artists for their inspirations and the influence of historical art movements on their work.

14. Field: Cybersecurity

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of two-factor authentication (2FA) in preventing unauthorized system access.

• Objective 1: To measure the frequency of unauthorized access attempts before and after the introduction of 2FA.
• Objective 2: To survey users about their experiences and challenges with 2FA implementation.
• Objective 3: To evaluate the efficacy of different types of 2FA (SMS-based, authenticator apps, biometrics, etc.).

15. Field: Cultural Studies

Aim: To analyze the role of music in cultural identity formation among ethnic minorities.

• Objective 1: To document the types and frequency of traditional music practices within selected ethnic minority communities.
• Objective 2: To survey community members on the role of music in their personal and communal identity.
• Objective 3: To explore the resilience and transmission of traditional music practices in contemporary society.

16. Field: Astronomy

Aim: To explore the impact of solar activity on satellite communication.

• Objective 1: To categorize different types of solar activities and their frequencies of occurrence.
• Objective 2: To ascertain how variations in solar activity may influence satellite communication.
• Objective 3: To investigate preventative and damage-control measures currently in place during periods of high solar activity.

17. Field: Literature

Aim: To examine narrative techniques in contemporary graphic novels.

• Objective 1: To identify a range of narrative techniques employed in this genre.
• Objective 2: To analyze the ways in which these narrative techniques engage readers and affect story interpretation.
• Objective 3: To compare narrative techniques in graphic novels to those found in traditional printed novels.

18. Field: Renewable Energy

Aim: To investigate the feasibility of solar energy as a primary renewable resource within urban areas.

• Objective 1: To quantify the average sunlight hours across urban areas in different climatic zones. 
• Objective 2: To calculate the potential solar energy that could be harnessed within these areas.
• Objective 3: To identify barriers or challenges to widespread solar energy implementation in urban settings and potential solutions.

19. Field: Sports Science

Aim: To evaluate the role of pre-game rituals in athlete performance.

• Objective 1: To identify the variety and frequency of pre-game rituals among professional athletes in several sports.
• Objective 2: To measure the impact of pre-game rituals on individual athletes’ performance metrics.
• Objective 3: To examine the psychological mechanisms that might explain the effects (if any) of pre-game ritual on performance.

20. Field: Ecology

Aim: To investigate the effects of urban noise pollution on bird populations.

• Objective 1: To record and quantify urban noise levels in various bird habitats.
• Objective 2: To measure bird population densities in relation to noise levels.
• Objective 3: To determine any changes in bird behavior or vocalization linked to noise levels.

21. Field: Food Science

Aim: To examine the influence of cooking methods on the nutritional value of vegetables.

• Objective 1: To identify the nutrient content of various vegetables both raw and after different cooking processes.
• Objective 2: To compare the effect of various cooking methods on the nutrient retention of these vegetables.
• Objective 3: To propose cooking strategies that optimize nutrient retention.

The Importance of Research Objectives

The importance of research objectives cannot be overstated. In essence, these guideposts articulate what the researcher aims to discover, understand, or examine (Kothari, 2014).

When drafting research objectives, it’s essential to make them simple and comprehensible, specific to the point of being quantifiable where possible, achievable in a practical sense, relevant to the chosen research question, and time-constrained to ensure efficient progress (Kumar, 2019). 

Remember that a good research objective is integral to the success of your project, offering a clear path forward for setting out a research design , and serving as the bedrock of your study plan. Each objective must distinctly address a different dimension of your research question or problem (Kothari, 2014). Always bear in mind that the ultimate purpose of your research objectives is to succinctly encapsulate your aims in the clearest way possible, facilitating a coherent, comprehensive and rational approach to your planned study, and furnishing a scientific roadmap for your journey into the depths of knowledge and research (Kumar, 2019). 

Kothari, C.R (2014). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques . New Delhi: New Age International.

Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners .New York: SAGE Publications.

Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management review, 70 (11), 35-36.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2013). New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance . New York: Routledge.

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Research Aims, Objectives & Questions

The “Golden Thread” Explained Simply (+ Examples)

By: David Phair (PhD) and Alexandra Shaeffer (PhD) | June 2022

The research aims , objectives and research questions (collectively called the “golden thread”) are arguably the most important thing you need to get right when you’re crafting a research proposal , dissertation or thesis . We receive questions almost every day about this “holy trinity” of research and there’s certainly a lot of confusion out there, so we’ve crafted this post to help you navigate your way through the fog.

Overview: The Golden Thread

• What is the golden thread
• What are research aims ( examples )
• What are research objectives ( examples )
• What are research questions ( examples )
• The importance of alignment in the golden thread

What is the “golden thread”?  

The golden thread simply refers to the collective research aims , research objectives , and research questions for any given project (i.e., a dissertation, thesis, or research paper ). These three elements are bundled together because it’s extremely important that they align with each other, and that the entire research project aligns with them.

Importantly, the golden thread needs to weave its way through the entirety of any research project , from start to end. In other words, it needs to be very clearly defined right at the beginning of the project (the topic ideation and proposal stage) and it needs to inform almost every decision throughout the rest of the project. For example, your research design and methodology will be heavily influenced by the golden thread (we’ll explain this in more detail later), as well as your literature review.

The research aims, objectives and research questions (the golden thread) define the focus and scope ( the delimitations ) of your research project. In other words, they help ringfence your dissertation or thesis to a relatively narrow domain, so that you can “go deep” and really dig into a specific problem or opportunity. They also help keep you on track , as they act as a litmus test for relevance. In other words, if you’re ever unsure whether to include something in your document, simply ask yourself the question, “does this contribute toward my research aims, objectives or questions?”. If it doesn’t, chances are you can drop it.

Alright, enough of the fluffy, conceptual stuff. Let’s get down to business and look at what exactly the research aims, objectives and questions are and outline a few examples to bring these concepts to life.

Research Aims: What are they?

Simply put, the research aim(s) is a statement that reflects the broad overarching goal (s) of the research project. Research aims are fairly high-level (low resolution) as they outline the general direction of the research and what it’s trying to achieve .

Research Aims: Examples  

True to the name, research aims usually start with the wording “this research aims to…”, “this research seeks to…”, and so on. For example:

“This research aims to explore employee experiences of digital transformation in retail HR.”   “This study sets out to assess the interaction between student support and self-care on well-being in engineering graduate students”  

As you can see, these research aims provide a high-level description of what the study is about and what it seeks to achieve. They’re not hyper-specific or action-oriented, but they’re clear about what the study’s focus is and what is being investigated.

Need a helping hand?

Research Objectives: What are they?

The research objectives take the research aims and make them more practical and actionable . In other words, the research objectives showcase the steps that the researcher will take to achieve the research aims.

The research objectives need to be far more specific (higher resolution) and actionable than the research aims. In fact, it’s always a good idea to craft your research objectives using the “SMART” criteria. In other words, they should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound”.

Research Objectives: Examples  

Let’s look at two examples of research objectives. We’ll stick with the topic and research aims we mentioned previously.  

For the digital transformation topic:

To observe the retail HR employees throughout the digital transformation. To assess employee perceptions of digital transformation in retail HR. To identify the barriers and facilitators of digital transformation in retail HR.

And for the student wellness topic:

To determine whether student self-care predicts the well-being score of engineering graduate students. To determine whether student support predicts the well-being score of engineering students. To assess the interaction between student self-care and student support when predicting well-being in engineering graduate students.

  As you can see, these research objectives clearly align with the previously mentioned research aims and effectively translate the low-resolution aims into (comparatively) higher-resolution objectives and action points . They give the research project a clear focus and present something that resembles a research-based “to-do” list.

Research Questions: What are they?

Finally, we arrive at the all-important research questions. The research questions are, as the name suggests, the key questions that your study will seek to answer . Simply put, they are the core purpose of your dissertation, thesis, or research project. You’ll present them at the beginning of your document (either in the introduction chapter or literature review chapter) and you’ll answer them at the end of your document (typically in the discussion and conclusion chapters).  

The research questions will be the driving force throughout the research process. For example, in the literature review chapter, you’ll assess the relevance of any given resource based on whether it helps you move towards answering your research questions. Similarly, your methodology and research design will be heavily influenced by the nature of your research questions. For instance, research questions that are exploratory in nature will usually make use of a qualitative approach, whereas questions that relate to measurement or relationship testing will make use of a quantitative approach.  

Let’s look at some examples of research questions to make this more tangible.

Research Questions: Examples  

Again, we’ll stick with the research aims and research objectives we mentioned previously.  

For the digital transformation topic (which would be qualitative in nature):

How do employees perceive digital transformation in retail HR? What are the barriers and facilitators of digital transformation in retail HR?  

And for the student wellness topic (which would be quantitative in nature):

Does student self-care predict the well-being scores of engineering graduate students? Does student support predict the well-being scores of engineering students? Do student self-care and student support interact when predicting well-being in engineering graduate students?  

You’ll probably notice that there’s quite a formulaic approach to this. In other words, the research questions are basically the research objectives “converted” into question format. While that is true most of the time, it’s not always the case. For example, the first research objective for the digital transformation topic was more or less a step on the path toward the other objectives, and as such, it didn’t warrant its own research question.  

So, don’t rush your research questions and sloppily reword your objectives as questions. Carefully think about what exactly you’re trying to achieve (i.e. your research aim) and the objectives you’ve set out, then craft a set of well-aligned research questions . Also, keep in mind that this can be a somewhat iterative process , where you go back and tweak research objectives and aims to ensure tight alignment throughout the golden thread.

The importance of strong alignment 

Alignment is the keyword here and we have to stress its importance . Simply put, you need to make sure that there is a very tight alignment between all three pieces of the golden thread. If your research aims and research questions don’t align, for example, your project will be pulling in different directions and will lack focus . This is a common problem students face and can cause many headaches (and tears), so be warned.

Take the time to carefully craft your research aims, objectives and research questions before you run off down the research path. Ideally, get your research supervisor/advisor to review and comment on your golden thread before you invest significant time into your project, and certainly before you start collecting data .  

Recap: The golden thread

In this post, we unpacked the golden thread of research, consisting of the research aims , research objectives and research questions . You can jump back to any section using the links below.

As always, feel free to leave a comment below – we always love to hear from you. Also, if you’re interested in 1-on-1 support, take a look at our private coaching service here.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

41 Comments

Thank you very much for your great effort put. As an Undergraduate taking Demographic Research & Methodology, I’ve been trying so hard to understand clearly what is a Research Question, Research Aim and the Objectives in a research and the relationship between them etc. But as for now I’m thankful that you’ve solved my problem.

Well appreciated. This has helped me greatly in doing my dissertation.

An so delighted with this wonderful information thank you a lot.

so impressive i have benefited a lot looking forward to learn more on research.

I am very happy to have carefully gone through this well researched article.

Infact,I used to be phobia about anything research, because of my poor understanding of the concepts.

Now,I get to know that my research question is the same as my research objective(s) rephrased in question format.

I please I would need a follow up on the subject,as I intends to join the team of researchers. Thanks once again.

Thanks so much. This was really helpful.

I know you pepole have tried to break things into more understandable and easy format. And God bless you. Keep it up

i found this document so useful towards my study in research methods. thanks so much.

This is my 2nd read topic in your course and I should commend the simplified explanations of each part. I’m beginning to understand and absorb the use of each part of a dissertation/thesis. I’ll keep on reading your free course and might be able to avail the training course! Kudos!

Thank you! Better put that my lecture and helped to easily understand the basics which I feel often get brushed over when beginning dissertation work.

This is quite helpful. I like how the Golden thread has been explained and the needed alignment.

This is quite helpful. I really appreciate!

The article made it simple for researcher students to differentiate between three concepts.

Very innovative and educational in approach to conducting research.

I am very impressed with all these terminology, as I am a fresh student for post graduate, I am highly guided and I promised to continue making consultation when the need arise. Thanks a lot.

A very helpful piece. thanks, I really appreciate it .

Very well explained, and it might be helpful to many people like me.

Wish i had found this (and other) resource(s) at the beginning of my PhD journey… not in my writing up year… 😩 Anyways… just a quick question as i’m having some issues ordering my “golden thread”…. does it matter in what order you mention them? i.e., is it always first aims, then objectives, and finally the questions? or can you first mention the research questions and then the aims and objectives?

Thank you for a very simple explanation that builds upon the concepts in a very logical manner. Just prior to this, I read the research hypothesis article, which was equally very good. This met my primary objective.

My secondary objective was to understand the difference between research questions and research hypothesis, and in which context to use which one. However, I am still not clear on this. Can you kindly please guide?

In research, a research question is a clear and specific inquiry that the researcher wants to answer, while a research hypothesis is a tentative statement or prediction about the relationship between variables or the expected outcome of the study. Research questions are broader and guide the overall study, while hypotheses are specific and testable statements used in quantitative research. Research questions identify the problem, while hypotheses provide a focus for testing in the study.

Exactly what I need in this research journey, I look forward to more of your coaching videos.

This helped a lot. Thanks so much for the effort put into explaining it.

What data source in writing dissertation/Thesis requires?

What is data source covers when writing dessertation/thesis

This is quite useful thanks

I’m excited and thankful. I got so much value which will help me progress in my thesis.

where are the locations of the reserch statement, research objective and research question in a reserach paper? Can you write an ouline that defines their places in the researh paper?

Very helpful and important tips on Aims, Objectives and Questions.

Thank you so much for making research aim, research objectives and research question so clear. This will be helpful to me as i continue with my thesis.

Thanks much for this content. I learned a lot. And I am inspired to learn more. I am still struggling with my preparation for dissertation outline/proposal. But I consistently follow contents and tutorials and the new FB of GRAD Coach. Hope to really become confident in writing my dissertation and successfully defend it.

As a researcher and lecturer, I find splitting research goals into research aims, objectives, and questions is unnecessarily bureaucratic and confusing for students. For most biomedical research projects, including ‘real research’, 1-3 research questions will suffice (numbers may differ by discipline).

Awesome! Very important resources and presented in an informative way to easily understand the golden thread. Indeed, thank you so much.

Well explained

The blog article on research aims, objectives, and questions by Grad Coach is a clear and insightful guide that aligns with my experiences in academic research. The article effectively breaks down the often complex concepts of research aims and objectives, providing a straightforward and accessible explanation. Drawing from my own research endeavors, I appreciate the practical tips offered, such as the need for specificity and clarity when formulating research questions. The article serves as a valuable resource for students and researchers, offering a concise roadmap for crafting well-defined research goals and objectives. Whether you’re a novice or an experienced researcher, this article provides practical insights that contribute to the foundational aspects of a successful research endeavor.

A great thanks for you. it is really amazing explanation. I grasp a lot and one step up to research knowledge.

I really found these tips helpful. Thank you very much Grad Coach.

I found this article helpful. Thanks for sharing this.

thank you so much, the explanation and examples are really helpful

This is a well researched and superbly written article for learners of research methods at all levels in the research topic from conceptualization to research findings and conclusions. I highly recommend this material to university graduate students. As an instructor of advanced research methods for PhD students, I have confirmed that I was giving the right guidelines for the degree they are undertaking.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Writing the Research Objectives: 5 Straightforward Examples

The research objective of a research proposal or scientific article defines the direction or content of a research investigation. Without the research objectives, the proposal or research paper is in disarray. It is like a fisherman riding on a boat without any purpose and with no destination in sight. Therefore, at the beginning of any research venture, the researcher must be clear about what he or she intends to do or achieve in conducting a study.

How do you define the objectives of a study? What are the uses of the research objective? How would a researcher write this essential part of the research? This article aims to provide answers to these questions.

Table of Contents

Definition of a research objective.

A research objective describes, in a few words, the result of the research project after its implementation. It answers the question,

The research objective provides direction to the performance of the study.

What are the Uses of the Research Objective?

The uses of the research objective are enumerated below:

The research design serves as the “blueprint” for the research investigation. The University of Southern California describes the different types of research design extensively. It details the data to be gathered, data collection procedure, data measurement, and statistical tests to use in the analysis.

The variables of the study include those factors that the researcher wants to evaluate in the study. These variables narrow down the research to several manageable components to see differences or correlations between them.

Specifying the data collection procedure ensures data accuracy and integrity . Thus, the probability of error is minimized. Generalizations or conclusions based on valid arguments founded on reliable data strengthens research findings on particular issues and problems.

In data mining activities where large data sets are involved, the research objective plays a crucial role. Without a clear objective to guide the machine learning process, the desired outcomes will not be met.

How is the Research Objective Written?

A research objective must be achievable, i.e., it must be framed keeping in mind the available time, infrastructure required for research, and other resources.

Before forming a research objective, you should read about all the developments in your area of research and find gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed. Readings will help you come up with suitable objectives for your research project.

5 Examples of Research Objectives

The following examples of research objectives based on several published studies on various topics demonstrate how the research objectives are written:

Finally, writing the research objectives requires constant practice, experience, and knowledge about the topic investigated. Clearly written objectives save time, money, and effort.

Evans, K. L., Rodrigues, A. S., Chown, S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2006). Protected areas and regional avian species richness in South Africa.  Biology letters ,  2 (2), 184-188.

Yeemin, T., Sutthacheep, M., & Pettongma, R. (2006). Coral reef restoration projects in Thailand.  Ocean & Coastal Management ,  49 (9-10), 562-575.

© 2020 March 23 P. A. Regoniel Updated 17 November 2020 | Updated 18 January 2024

Related Posts

How to write a thesis statement, mango pulp weevil: a pest control problem in palawan island, how to conduct a focus group discussion, about the author, patrick regoniel.

Dr. Regoniel, a hobbyist writer, served as consultant to various environmental research and development projects covering issues and concerns on climate change, coral reef resources and management, economic valuation of environmental and natural resources, mining, and waste management and pollution. He has extensive experience on applied statistics, systems modelling and analysis, an avid practitioner of LaTeX, and a multidisciplinary web developer. He leverages pioneering AI-powered content creation tools to produce unique and comprehensive articles in this website.

SimplyEducate.Me Privacy Policy

• Privacy Policy

Home » Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and Analysis

Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and Analysis

Table of Contents

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research is a type of research that collects and analyzes numerical data to test hypotheses and answer research questions . This research typically involves a large sample size and uses statistical analysis to make inferences about a population based on the data collected. It often involves the use of surveys, experiments, or other structured data collection methods to gather quantitative data.

Quantitative Research Methods

Quantitative Research Methods are as follows:

Descriptive Research Design

Descriptive research design is used to describe the characteristics of a population or phenomenon being studied. This research method is used to answer the questions of what, where, when, and how. Descriptive research designs use a variety of methods such as observation, case studies, and surveys to collect data. The data is then analyzed using statistical tools to identify patterns and relationships.

Correlational Research Design

Correlational research design is used to investigate the relationship between two or more variables. Researchers use correlational research to determine whether a relationship exists between variables and to what extent they are related. This research method involves collecting data from a sample and analyzing it using statistical tools such as correlation coefficients.

Quasi-experimental Research Design

Quasi-experimental research design is used to investigate cause-and-effect relationships between variables. This research method is similar to experimental research design, but it lacks full control over the independent variable. Researchers use quasi-experimental research designs when it is not feasible or ethical to manipulate the independent variable.

Experimental Research Design

Experimental research design is used to investigate cause-and-effect relationships between variables. This research method involves manipulating the independent variable and observing the effects on the dependent variable. Researchers use experimental research designs to test hypotheses and establish cause-and-effect relationships.

Survey Research

Survey research involves collecting data from a sample of individuals using a standardized questionnaire. This research method is used to gather information on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of individuals. Researchers use survey research to collect data quickly and efficiently from a large sample size. Survey research can be conducted through various methods such as online, phone, mail, or in-person interviews.

Quantitative Research Analysis Methods

Here are some commonly used quantitative research analysis methods:

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis is the most common quantitative research analysis method. It involves using statistical tools and techniques to analyze the numerical data collected during the research process. Statistical analysis can be used to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables, and to test hypotheses and theories.

Regression Analysis

Regression analysis is a statistical technique used to analyze the relationship between one dependent variable and one or more independent variables. Researchers use regression analysis to identify and quantify the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable.

Factor Analysis

Factor analysis is a statistical technique used to identify underlying factors that explain the correlations among a set of variables. Researchers use factor analysis to reduce a large number of variables to a smaller set of factors that capture the most important information.

Structural Equation Modeling

Structural equation modeling is a statistical technique used to test complex relationships between variables. It involves specifying a model that includes both observed and unobserved variables, and then using statistical methods to test the fit of the model to the data.

Time Series Analysis

Time series analysis is a statistical technique used to analyze data that is collected over time. It involves identifying patterns and trends in the data, as well as any seasonal or cyclical variations.

Multilevel Modeling

Multilevel modeling is a statistical technique used to analyze data that is nested within multiple levels. For example, researchers might use multilevel modeling to analyze data that is collected from individuals who are nested within groups, such as students nested within schools.

Applications of Quantitative Research

Quantitative research has many applications across a wide range of fields. Here are some common examples:

• Market Research : Quantitative research is used extensively in market research to understand consumer behavior, preferences, and trends. Researchers use surveys, experiments, and other quantitative methods to collect data that can inform marketing strategies, product development, and pricing decisions.
• Health Research: Quantitative research is used in health research to study the effectiveness of medical treatments, identify risk factors for diseases, and track health outcomes over time. Researchers use statistical methods to analyze data from clinical trials, surveys, and other sources to inform medical practice and policy.
• Social Science Research: Quantitative research is used in social science research to study human behavior, attitudes, and social structures. Researchers use surveys, experiments, and other quantitative methods to collect data that can inform social policies, educational programs, and community interventions.
• Education Research: Quantitative research is used in education research to study the effectiveness of teaching methods, assess student learning outcomes, and identify factors that influence student success. Researchers use experimental and quasi-experimental designs, as well as surveys and other quantitative methods, to collect and analyze data.
• Environmental Research: Quantitative research is used in environmental research to study the impact of human activities on the environment, assess the effectiveness of conservation strategies, and identify ways to reduce environmental risks. Researchers use statistical methods to analyze data from field studies, experiments, and other sources.

Characteristics of Quantitative Research

Here are some key characteristics of quantitative research:

• Numerical data : Quantitative research involves collecting numerical data through standardized methods such as surveys, experiments, and observational studies. This data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify patterns and relationships.
• Large sample size: Quantitative research often involves collecting data from a large sample of individuals or groups in order to increase the reliability and generalizability of the findings.
• Objective approach: Quantitative research aims to be objective and impartial in its approach, focusing on the collection and analysis of data rather than personal beliefs, opinions, or experiences.
• Control over variables: Quantitative research often involves manipulating variables to test hypotheses and establish cause-and-effect relationships. Researchers aim to control for extraneous variables that may impact the results.
• Replicable : Quantitative research aims to be replicable, meaning that other researchers should be able to conduct similar studies and obtain similar results using the same methods.
• Statistical analysis: Quantitative research involves using statistical tools and techniques to analyze the numerical data collected during the research process. Statistical analysis allows researchers to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables, and to test hypotheses and theories.
• Generalizability: Quantitative research aims to produce findings that can be generalized to larger populations beyond the specific sample studied. This is achieved through the use of random sampling methods and statistical inference.

Examples of Quantitative Research

Here are some examples of quantitative research in different fields:

• Market Research: A company conducts a survey of 1000 consumers to determine their brand awareness and preferences. The data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify trends and patterns that can inform marketing strategies.
• Health Research : A researcher conducts a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a new drug for treating a particular medical condition. The study involves collecting data from a large sample of patients and analyzing the results using statistical methods.
• Social Science Research : A sociologist conducts a survey of 500 people to study attitudes toward immigration in a particular country. The data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify factors that influence these attitudes.
• Education Research: A researcher conducts an experiment to compare the effectiveness of two different teaching methods for improving student learning outcomes. The study involves randomly assigning students to different groups and collecting data on their performance on standardized tests.
• Environmental Research : A team of researchers conduct a study to investigate the impact of climate change on the distribution and abundance of a particular species of plant or animal. The study involves collecting data on environmental factors and population sizes over time and analyzing the results using statistical methods.
• Psychology : A researcher conducts a survey of 500 college students to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health. The data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify correlations and potential causal relationships.
• Political Science: A team of researchers conducts a study to investigate voter behavior during an election. They use survey methods to collect data on voting patterns, demographics, and political attitudes, and analyze the results using statistical methods.

How to Conduct Quantitative Research

Here is a general overview of how to conduct quantitative research:

• Develop a research question: The first step in conducting quantitative research is to develop a clear and specific research question. This question should be based on a gap in existing knowledge, and should be answerable using quantitative methods.
• Develop a research design: Once you have a research question, you will need to develop a research design. This involves deciding on the appropriate methods to collect data, such as surveys, experiments, or observational studies. You will also need to determine the appropriate sample size, data collection instruments, and data analysis techniques.
• Collect data: The next step is to collect data. This may involve administering surveys or questionnaires, conducting experiments, or gathering data from existing sources. It is important to use standardized methods to ensure that the data is reliable and valid.
• Analyze data : Once the data has been collected, it is time to analyze it. This involves using statistical methods to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables. Common statistical techniques include correlation analysis, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing.
• Interpret results: After analyzing the data, you will need to interpret the results. This involves identifying the key findings, determining their significance, and drawing conclusions based on the data.
• Communicate findings: Finally, you will need to communicate your findings. This may involve writing a research report, presenting at a conference, or publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. It is important to clearly communicate the research question, methods, results, and conclusions to ensure that others can understand and replicate your research.

When to use Quantitative Research

Here are some situations when quantitative research can be appropriate:

• To test a hypothesis: Quantitative research is often used to test a hypothesis or a theory. It involves collecting numerical data and using statistical analysis to determine if the data supports or refutes the hypothesis.
• To generalize findings: If you want to generalize the findings of your study to a larger population, quantitative research can be useful. This is because it allows you to collect numerical data from a representative sample of the population and use statistical analysis to make inferences about the population as a whole.
• To measure relationships between variables: If you want to measure the relationship between two or more variables, such as the relationship between age and income, or between education level and job satisfaction, quantitative research can be useful. It allows you to collect numerical data on both variables and use statistical analysis to determine the strength and direction of the relationship.
• To identify patterns or trends: Quantitative research can be useful for identifying patterns or trends in data. For example, you can use quantitative research to identify trends in consumer behavior or to identify patterns in stock market data.
• To quantify attitudes or opinions : If you want to measure attitudes or opinions on a particular topic, quantitative research can be useful. It allows you to collect numerical data using surveys or questionnaires and analyze the data using statistical methods to determine the prevalence of certain attitudes or opinions.

Purpose of Quantitative Research

The purpose of quantitative research is to systematically investigate and measure the relationships between variables or phenomena using numerical data and statistical analysis. The main objectives of quantitative research include:

• Description : To provide a detailed and accurate description of a particular phenomenon or population.
• Explanation : To explain the reasons for the occurrence of a particular phenomenon, such as identifying the factors that influence a behavior or attitude.
• Prediction : To predict future trends or behaviors based on past patterns and relationships between variables.
• Control : To identify the best strategies for controlling or influencing a particular outcome or behavior.

Quantitative research is used in many different fields, including social sciences, business, engineering, and health sciences. It can be used to investigate a wide range of phenomena, from human behavior and attitudes to physical and biological processes. The purpose of quantitative research is to provide reliable and valid data that can be used to inform decision-making and improve understanding of the world around us.

Advantages of Quantitative Research

There are several advantages of quantitative research, including:

• Objectivity : Quantitative research is based on objective data and statistical analysis, which reduces the potential for bias or subjectivity in the research process.
• Reproducibility : Because quantitative research involves standardized methods and measurements, it is more likely to be reproducible and reliable.
• Generalizability : Quantitative research allows for generalizations to be made about a population based on a representative sample, which can inform decision-making and policy development.
• Precision : Quantitative research allows for precise measurement and analysis of data, which can provide a more accurate understanding of phenomena and relationships between variables.
• Efficiency : Quantitative research can be conducted relatively quickly and efficiently, especially when compared to qualitative research, which may involve lengthy data collection and analysis.
• Large sample sizes : Quantitative research can accommodate large sample sizes, which can increase the representativeness and generalizability of the results.

Limitations of Quantitative Research

There are several limitations of quantitative research, including:

• Limited understanding of context: Quantitative research typically focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the context or underlying factors that influence a phenomenon.
• Simplification of complex phenomena: Quantitative research often involves simplifying complex phenomena into measurable variables, which may not capture the full complexity of the phenomenon being studied.
• Potential for researcher bias: Although quantitative research aims to be objective, there is still the potential for researcher bias in areas such as sampling, data collection, and data analysis.
• Limited ability to explore new ideas: Quantitative research is often based on pre-determined research questions and hypotheses, which may limit the ability to explore new ideas or unexpected findings.
• Limited ability to capture subjective experiences : Quantitative research is typically focused on objective data and may not capture the subjective experiences of individuals or groups being studied.
• Ethical concerns : Quantitative research may raise ethical concerns, such as invasion of privacy or the potential for harm to participants.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

Textual Analysis – Types, Examples and Guide

Ethnographic Research -Types, Methods and Guide

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Focus Groups – Steps, Examples and Guide

Quasi-Experimental Research Design – Types...

• Aims and Objectives – A Guide for Academic Writing
• Doing a PhD

One of the most important aspects of a thesis, dissertation or research paper is the correct formulation of the aims and objectives. This is because your aims and objectives will establish the scope, depth and direction that your research will ultimately take. An effective set of aims and objectives will give your research focus and your reader clarity, with your aims indicating what is to be achieved, and your objectives indicating how it will be achieved.

Introduction

There is no getting away from the importance of the aims and objectives in determining the success of your research project. Unfortunately, however, it is an aspect that many students struggle with, and ultimately end up doing poorly. Given their importance, if you suspect that there is even the smallest possibility that you belong to this group of students, we strongly recommend you read this page in full.

This page describes what research aims and objectives are, how they differ from each other, how to write them correctly, and the common mistakes students make and how to avoid them. An example of a good aim and objectives from a past thesis has also been deconstructed to help your understanding.

What Are Aims and Objectives?

Research aims.

A research aim describes the main goal or the overarching purpose of your research project.

In doing so, it acts as a focal point for your research and provides your readers with clarity as to what your study is all about. Because of this, research aims are almost always located within its own subsection under the introduction section of a research document, regardless of whether it’s a thesis , a dissertation, or a research paper .

A research aim is usually formulated as a broad statement of the main goal of the research and can range in length from a single sentence to a short paragraph. Although the exact format may vary according to preference, they should all describe why your research is needed (i.e. the context), what it sets out to accomplish (the actual aim) and, briefly, how it intends to accomplish it (overview of your objectives).

To give an example, we have extracted the following research aim from a real PhD thesis:

Example of a Research Aim

The role of diametrical cup deformation as a factor to unsatisfactory implant performance has not been widely reported. The aim of this thesis was to gain an understanding of the diametrical deformation behaviour of acetabular cups and shells following impaction into the reamed acetabulum. The influence of a range of factors on deformation was investigated to ascertain if cup and shell deformation may be high enough to potentially contribute to early failure and high wear rates in metal-on-metal implants.

Note: Extracted with permission from thesis titled “T he Impact And Deformation Of Press-Fit Metal Acetabular Components ” produced by Dr H Hothi of previously Queen Mary University of London.

Research Objectives

Where a research aim specifies what your study will answer, research objectives specify how your study will answer it.

They divide your research aim into several smaller parts, each of which represents a key section of your research project. As a result, almost all research objectives take the form of a numbered list, with each item usually receiving its own chapter in a dissertation or thesis.

Following the example of the research aim shared above, here are it’s real research objectives as an example:

Example of a Research Objective

• Develop finite element models using explicit dynamics to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion, initially using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum.
• Investigate the number, velocity and position of impacts needed to insert a cup.
• Determine the relationship between the size of interference between the cup and cavity and deformation for different cup types.
• Investigate the influence of non-uniform cup support and varying the orientation of the component in the cavity on deformation.
• Examine the influence of errors during reaming of the acetabulum which introduce ovality to the cavity.
• Determine the relationship between changes in the geometry of the component and deformation for different cup designs.
• Develop three dimensional pelvis models with non-uniform bone material properties from a range of patients with varying bone quality.
• Use the key parameters that influence deformation, as identified in the foam models to determine the range of deformations that may occur clinically using the anatomic models and if these deformations are clinically significant.

It’s worth noting that researchers sometimes use research questions instead of research objectives, or in other cases both. From a high-level perspective, research questions and research objectives make the same statements, but just in different formats.

Taking the first three research objectives as an example, they can be restructured into research questions as follows:

Restructuring Research Objectives as Research Questions

• Can finite element models using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum together with explicit dynamics be used to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion?
• What is the number, velocity and position of impacts needed to insert a cup?
• What is the relationship between the size of interference between the cup and cavity and deformation for different cup types?

Difference Between Aims and Objectives

Hopefully the above explanations make clear the differences between aims and objectives, but to clarify:

• The research aim focus on what the research project is intended to achieve; research objectives focus on how the aim will be achieved.
• Research aims are relatively broad; research objectives are specific.
• Research aims focus on a project’s long-term outcomes; research objectives focus on its immediate, short-term outcomes.
• A research aim can be written in a single sentence or short paragraph; research objectives should be written as a numbered list.

How to Write Aims and Objectives

Before we discuss how to write a clear set of research aims and objectives, we should make it clear that there is no single way they must be written. Each researcher will approach their aims and objectives slightly differently, and often your supervisor will influence the formulation of yours on the basis of their own preferences.

Regardless, there are some basic principles that you should observe for good practice; these principles are described below.

Your aim should be made up of three parts that answer the below questions:

• Why is this research required?
• What is this research about?
• How are you going to do it?

The easiest way to achieve this would be to address each question in its own sentence, although it does not matter whether you combine them or write multiple sentences for each, the key is to address each one.

The first question, why , provides context to your research project, the second question, what , describes the aim of your research, and the last question, how , acts as an introduction to your objectives which will immediately follow.

Scroll through the image set below to see the ‘why, what and how’ associated with our research aim example.

Note: Your research aims need not be limited to one. Some individuals per to define one broad ‘overarching aim’ of a project and then adopt two or three specific research aims for their thesis or dissertation. Remember, however, that in order for your assessors to consider your research project complete, you will need to prove you have fulfilled all of the aims you set out to achieve. Therefore, while having more than one research aim is not necessarily disadvantageous, consider whether a single overarching one will do.

Research Objectives

Each of your research objectives should be SMART :

• Specific – is there any ambiguity in the action you are going to undertake, or is it focused and well-defined?
• Measurable – how will you measure progress and determine when you have achieved the action?
• Achievable – do you have the support, resources and facilities required to carry out the action?
• Relevant – is the action essential to the achievement of your research aim?
• Timebound – can you realistically complete the action in the available time alongside your other research tasks?

In addition to being SMART, your research objectives should start with a verb that helps communicate your intent. Common research verbs include:

Table of Research Verbs to Use in Aims and Objectives

Last, format your objectives into a numbered list. This is because when you write your thesis or dissertation, you will at times need to make reference to a specific research objective; structuring your research objectives in a numbered list will provide a clear way of doing this.

To bring all this together, let’s compare the first research objective in the previous example with the above guidance:

Checking Research Objective Example Against Recommended Approach

Research Objective:

1. Develop finite element models using explicit dynamics to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion, initially using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum.

Checking Against Recommended Approach:

Q: Is it specific? A: Yes, it is clear what the student intends to do (produce a finite element model), why they intend to do it (mimic cup/shell blows) and their parameters have been well-defined ( using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum ).

Q: Is it measurable? A: Yes, it is clear that the research objective will be achieved once the finite element model is complete.

Q: Is it achievable? A: Yes, provided the student has access to a computer lab, modelling software and laboratory data.

Q: Is it relevant? A: Yes, mimicking impacts to a cup/shell is fundamental to the overall aim of understanding how they deform when impacted upon.

Q: Is it timebound? A: Yes, it is possible to create a limited-scope finite element model in a relatively short time, especially if you already have experience in modelling.

Q: Does it start with a verb? A: Yes, it starts with ‘develop’, which makes the intent of the objective immediately clear.

Q: Is it a numbered list? A: Yes, it is the first research objective in a list of eight.

Mistakes in Writing Research Aims and Objectives

1. making your research aim too broad.

Having a research aim too broad becomes very difficult to achieve. Normally, this occurs when a student develops their research aim before they have a good understanding of what they want to research. Remember that at the end of your project and during your viva defence , you will have to prove that you have achieved your research aims; if they are too broad, this will be an almost impossible task. In the early stages of your research project, your priority should be to narrow your study to a specific area. A good way to do this is to take the time to study existing literature, question their current approaches, findings and limitations, and consider whether there are any recurring gaps that could be investigated .

Note: Achieving a set of aims does not necessarily mean proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis, even if your research aim was to, but having done enough work to provide a useful and original insight into the principles that underlie your research aim.

2. Making Your Research Objectives Too Ambitious

Be realistic about what you can achieve in the time you have available. It is natural to want to set ambitious research objectives that require sophisticated data collection and analysis, but only completing this with six months before the end of your PhD registration period is not a worthwhile trade-off.

3. Formulating Repetitive Research Objectives

Each research objective should have its own purpose and distinct measurable outcome. To this effect, a common mistake is to form research objectives which have large amounts of overlap. This makes it difficult to determine when an objective is truly complete, and also presents challenges in estimating the duration of objectives when creating your project timeline. It also makes it difficult to structure your thesis into unique chapters, making it more challenging for you to write and for your audience to read.

Fortunately, this oversight can be easily avoided by using SMART objectives.

Hopefully, you now have a good idea of how to create an effective set of aims and objectives for your research project, whether it be a thesis, dissertation or research paper. While it may be tempting to dive directly into your research, spending time on getting your aims and objectives right will give your research clear direction. This won’t only reduce the likelihood of problems arising later down the line, but will also lead to a more thorough and coherent research project.

Finding a PhD has never been this easy – search for a PhD by keyword, location or academic area of interest.

Browse PhDs Now

Join thousands of students.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is Quantitative Research? Definition, Methods, Types, and Examples

If you’re wondering what is quantitative research and whether this methodology works for your research study, you’re not alone. If you want a simple quantitative research definition , then it’s enough to say that this is a method undertaken by researchers based on their study requirements. However, to select the most appropriate research for their study type, researchers should know all the methods available. 

Selecting the right research method depends on a few important criteria, such as the research question, study type, time, costs, data availability, and availability of respondents. There are two main types of research methods— quantitative research  and qualitative research. The purpose of quantitative research is to validate or test a theory or hypothesis and that of qualitative research is to understand a subject or event or identify reasons for observed patterns.   

Quantitative research methods  are used to observe events that affect a particular group of individuals, which is the sample population. In this type of research, diverse numerical data are collected through various methods and then statistically analyzed to aggregate the data, compare them, or show relationships among the data. Quantitative research methods broadly include questionnaires, structured observations, and experiments.  

Here are two quantitative research examples:  

• Satisfaction surveys sent out by a company regarding their revamped customer service initiatives. Customers are asked to rate their experience on a rating scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).  
• A school has introduced a new after-school program for children, and a few months after commencement, the school sends out feedback questionnaires to the parents of the enrolled children. Such questionnaires usually include close-ended questions that require either definite answers or a Yes/No option. This helps in a quick, overall assessment of the program’s outreach and success.  

Table of Contents

What is quantitative research ? 1,2

The steps shown in the figure can be grouped into the following broad steps:  

• Theory : Define the problem area or area of interest and create a research question.  
• Hypothesis : Develop a hypothesis based on the research question. This hypothesis will be tested in the remaining steps.  
• Research design : In this step, the most appropriate quantitative research design will be selected, including deciding on the sample size, selecting respondents, identifying research sites, if any, etc.
• Data collection : This process could be extensive based on your research objective and sample size.  
• Data analysis : Statistical analysis is used to analyze the data collected. The results from the analysis help in either supporting or rejecting your hypothesis.  
• Present results : Based on the data analysis, conclusions are drawn, and results are presented as accurately as possible.  

Quantitative research characteristics 4

• Large sample size : This ensures reliability because this sample represents the target population or market. Due to the large sample size, the outcomes can be generalized to the entire population as well, making this one of the important characteristics of quantitative research .  
• Structured data and measurable variables: The data are numeric and can be analyzed easily. Quantitative research involves the use of measurable variables such as age, salary range, highest education, etc.  
• Easy-to-use data collection methods : The methods include experiments, controlled observations, and questionnaires and surveys with a rating scale or close-ended questions, which require simple and to-the-point answers; are not bound by geographical regions; and are easy to administer.  
• Data analysis : Structured and accurate statistical analysis methods using software applications such as Excel, SPSS, R. The analysis is fast, accurate, and less effort intensive.  
• Reliable : The respondents answer close-ended questions, their responses are direct without ambiguity and yield numeric outcomes, which are therefore highly reliable.  
• Reusable outcomes : This is one of the key characteristics – outcomes of one research can be used and replicated in other research as well and is not exclusive to only one study.  

Quantitative research methods 5

Quantitative research methods are classified into two types—primary and secondary.  

Primary quantitative research method:

In this type of quantitative research , data are directly collected by the researchers using the following methods.

– Survey research : Surveys are the easiest and most commonly used quantitative research method . They are of two types— cross-sectional and longitudinal.   

->Cross-sectional surveys are specifically conducted on a target population for a specified period, that is, these surveys have a specific starting and ending time and researchers study the events during this period to arrive at conclusions. The main purpose of these surveys is to describe and assess the characteristics of a population. There is one independent variable in this study, which is a common factor applicable to all participants in the population, for example, living in a specific city, diagnosed with a specific disease, of a certain age group, etc. An example of a cross-sectional survey is a study to understand why individuals residing in houses built before 1979 in the US are more susceptible to lead contamination.  

->Longitudinal surveys are conducted at different time durations. These surveys involve observing the interactions among different variables in the target population, exposing them to various causal factors, and understanding their effects across a longer period. These studies are helpful to analyze a problem in the long term. An example of a longitudinal study is the study of the relationship between smoking and lung cancer over a long period.  

– Descriptive research : Explains the current status of an identified and measurable variable. Unlike other types of quantitative research , a hypothesis is not needed at the beginning of the study and can be developed even after data collection. This type of quantitative research describes the characteristics of a problem and answers the what, when, where of a problem. However, it doesn’t answer the why of the problem and doesn’t explore cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Data from this research could be used as preliminary data for another study. Example: A researcher undertakes a study to examine the growth strategy of a company. This sample data can be used by other companies to determine their own growth strategy.  

– Correlational research : This quantitative research method is used to establish a relationship between two variables using statistical analysis and analyze how one affects the other. The research is non-experimental because the researcher doesn’t control or manipulate any of the variables. At least two separate sample groups are needed for this research. Example: Researchers studying a correlation between regular exercise and diabetes.  

– Causal-comparative research : This type of quantitative research examines the cause-effect relationships in retrospect between a dependent and independent variable and determines the causes of the already existing differences between groups of people. This is not a true experiment because it doesn’t assign participants to groups randomly. Example: To study the wage differences between men and women in the same role. For this, already existing wage information is analyzed to understand the relationship.  

– Experimental research : This quantitative research method uses true experiments or scientific methods for determining a cause-effect relation between variables. It involves testing a hypothesis through experiments, in which one or more independent variables are manipulated and then their effect on dependent variables are studied. Example: A researcher studies the importance of a drug in treating a disease by administering the drug in few patients and not administering in a few.  

The following data collection methods are commonly used in primary quantitative research :  

• Sampling : The most common type is probability sampling, in which a sample is chosen from a larger population using some form of random selection, that is, every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected. The different types of probability sampling are—simple random, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.  
• Interviews : These are commonly telephonic or face-to-face.  
• Observations : Structured observations are most commonly used in quantitative research . In this method, researchers make observations about specific behaviors of individuals in a structured setting.  
• Document review : Reviewing existing research or documents to collect evidence for supporting the quantitative research .  
• Surveys and questionnaires : Surveys can be administered both online and offline depending on the requirement and sample size.

The data collected can be analyzed in several ways in quantitative research , as listed below:  

• Cross-tabulation —Uses a tabular format to draw inferences among collected data  
• MaxDiff analysis —Gauges the preferences of the respondents  
• TURF analysis —Total Unduplicated Reach and Frequency Analysis; helps in determining the market strategy for a business  
• Gap analysis —Identify gaps in attaining the desired results  
• SWOT analysis —Helps identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a product, service, or organization  
• Text analysis —Used for interpreting unstructured data  

Secondary quantitative research methods :

This method involves conducting research using already existing or secondary data. This method is less effort intensive and requires lesser time. However, researchers should verify the authenticity and recency of the sources being used and ensure their accuracy.  

The main sources of secondary data are: 

• The Internet  
• Government and non-government sources  
• Public libraries  
• Educational institutions  
• Commercial information sources such as newspapers, journals, radio, TV  

When to use quantitative research 6  

Here are some simple ways to decide when to use quantitative research . Use quantitative research to:  

• recommend a final course of action  
• find whether a consensus exists regarding a particular subject  
• generalize results to a larger population  
• determine a cause-and-effect relationship between variables  
• describe characteristics of specific groups of people  
• test hypotheses and examine specific relationships  
• identify and establish size of market segments  

A research case study to understand when to use quantitative research 7  

Context: A study was undertaken to evaluate a major innovation in a hospital’s design, in terms of workforce implications and impact on patient and staff experiences of all single-room hospital accommodations. The researchers undertook a mixed methods approach to answer their research questions. Here, we focus on the quantitative research aspect.  

Research questions : What are the advantages and disadvantages for the staff as a result of the hospital’s move to the new design with all single-room accommodations? Did the move affect staff experience and well-being and improve their ability to deliver high-quality care?  

Method: The researchers obtained quantitative data from three sources:  

• Staff activity (task time distribution): Each staff member was shadowed by a researcher who observed each task undertaken by the staff, and logged the time spent on each activity.  
• Staff travel distances : The staff were requested to wear pedometers, which recorded the distances covered.  
• Staff experience surveys : Staff were surveyed before and after the move to the new hospital design.  

Results of quantitative research : The following observations were made based on quantitative data analysis:  

• The move to the new design did not result in a significant change in the proportion of time spent on different activities.  
• Staff activity events observed per session were higher after the move, and direct care and professional communication events per hour decreased significantly, suggesting fewer interruptions and less fragmented care.  
• A significant increase in medication tasks among the recorded events suggests that medication administration was integrated into patient care activities.  
• Travel distances increased for all staff, with highest increases for staff in the older people’s ward and surgical wards.  
• Ratings for staff toilet facilities, locker facilities, and space at staff bases were higher but those for social interaction and natural light were lower.  

Advantages of quantitative research 1,2

When choosing the right research methodology, also consider the advantages of quantitative research and how it can impact your study.  

• Quantitative research methods are more scientific and rational. They use quantifiable data leading to objectivity in the results and avoid any chances of ambiguity.  
• This type of research uses numeric data so analysis is relatively easier .  
• In most cases, a hypothesis is already developed and quantitative research helps in testing and validatin g these constructed theories based on which researchers can make an informed decision about accepting or rejecting their theory.  
• The use of statistical analysis software ensures quick analysis of large volumes of data and is less effort intensive.  
• Higher levels of control can be applied to the research so the chances of bias can be reduced.  
• Quantitative research is based on measured value s, facts, and verifiable information so it can be easily checked or replicated by other researchers leading to continuity in scientific research.  

Disadvantages of quantitative research 1,2

Quantitative research may also be limiting; take a look at the disadvantages of quantitative research. 

• Experiments are conducted in controlled settings instead of natural settings and it is possible for researchers to either intentionally or unintentionally manipulate the experiment settings to suit the results they desire.  
• Participants must necessarily give objective answers (either one- or two-word, or yes or no answers) and the reasons for their selection or the context are not considered.   
• Inadequate knowledge of statistical analysis methods may affect the results and their interpretation.  
• Although statistical analysis indicates the trends or patterns among variables, the reasons for these observed patterns cannot be interpreted and the research may not give a complete picture.  
• Large sample sizes are needed for more accurate and generalizable analysis .  
• Quantitative research cannot be used to address complex issues.  

Frequently asked questions on  quantitative research    

Q:  What is the difference between quantitative research and qualitative research? 1  

A:  The following table lists the key differences between quantitative research and qualitative research, some of which may have been mentioned earlier in the article.  

Q:  What is the difference between reliability and validity? 8,9    

A:  The term reliability refers to the consistency of a research study. For instance, if a food-measuring weighing scale gives different readings every time the same quantity of food is measured then that weighing scale is not reliable. If the findings in a research study are consistent every time a measurement is made, then the study is considered reliable. However, it is usually unlikely to obtain the exact same results every time because some contributing variables may change. In such cases, a correlation coefficient is used to assess the degree of reliability. A strong positive correlation between the results indicates reliability.  

Validity can be defined as the degree to which a tool actually measures what it claims to measure. It helps confirm the credibility of your research and suggests that the results may be generalizable. In other words, it measures the accuracy of the research.  

The following table gives the key differences between reliability and validity.  

Q:  What is mixed methods research? 10

A:  A mixed methods approach combines the characteristics of both quantitative research and qualitative research in the same study. This method allows researchers to validate their findings, verify if the results observed using both methods are complementary, and explain any unexpected results obtained from one method by using the other method. A mixed methods research design is useful in case of research questions that cannot be answered by either quantitative research or qualitative research alone. However, this method could be more effort- and cost-intensive because of the requirement of more resources. The figure 3 shows some basic mixed methods research designs that could be used.  

Thus, quantitative research is the appropriate method for testing your hypotheses and can be used either alone or in combination with qualitative research per your study requirements. We hope this article has provided an insight into the various facets of quantitative research , including its different characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages, and a few tips to quickly understand when to use this research method.  

References  

• Qualitative vs quantitative research: Differences, examples, & methods. Simply Psychology. Accessed Feb 28, 2023. https://simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html#Quantitative-Research  
• Your ultimate guide to quantitative research. Qualtrics. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://www.qualtrics.com/uk/experience-management/research/quantitative-research/  
• The steps of quantitative research. Revise Sociology. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://revisesociology.com/2017/11/26/the-steps-of-quantitative-research/  
• What are the characteristics of quantitative research? Marketing91. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://www.marketing91.com/characteristics-of-quantitative-research/  
• Quantitative research: Types, characteristics, methods, & examples. ProProfs Survey Maker. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://www.proprofssurvey.com/blog/quantitative-research/#Characteristics_of_Quantitative_Research  
• Qualitative research isn’t as scientific as quantitative methods. Kmusial blog. Accessed March 5, 2023. https://kmusial.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/qualitative-research-isnt-as-scientific-as-quantitative-methods/  
• Maben J, Griffiths P, Penfold C, et al. Evaluating a major innovation in hospital design: workforce implications and impact on patient and staff experiences of all single room hospital accommodation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Feb. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 3.3.) Chapter 5, Case study quantitative data findings. Accessed March 6, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274429/  
• McLeod, S. A. (2007).  What is reliability?  Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/reliability.html  
• Reliability vs validity: Differences & examples. Accessed March 5, 2023. https://statisticsbyjim.com/basics/reliability-vs-validity/  
• Mixed methods research. Community Engagement Program. Harvard Catalyst. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://catalyst.harvard.edu/community-engagement/mmr  

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

Back to School – Lock-in All Access Pack for a Year at the Best Price

Journal Turnaround Time: Researcher.Life and Scholarly Intelligence Join Hands to Empower Researchers with Publication Time Insights 

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.53(4); 2010 Aug

Research questions, hypotheses and objectives

Patricia farrugia.

* Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, the

Bradley A. Petrisor

† Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and the

Forough Farrokhyar

‡ Departments of Surgery and

§ Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont

Mohit Bhandari

There is an increasing familiarity with the principles of evidence-based medicine in the surgical community. As surgeons become more aware of the hierarchy of evidence, grades of recommendations and the principles of critical appraisal, they develop an increasing familiarity with research design. Surgeons and clinicians are looking more and more to the literature and clinical trials to guide their practice; as such, it is becoming a responsibility of the clinical research community to attempt to answer questions that are not only well thought out but also clinically relevant. The development of the research question, including a supportive hypothesis and objectives, is a necessary key step in producing clinically relevant results to be used in evidence-based practice. A well-defined and specific research question is more likely to help guide us in making decisions about study design and population and subsequently what data will be collected and analyzed. 1

Objectives of this article

In this article, we discuss important considerations in the development of a research question and hypothesis and in defining objectives for research. By the end of this article, the reader will be able to appreciate the significance of constructing a good research question and developing hypotheses and research objectives for the successful design of a research study. The following article is divided into 3 sections: research question, research hypothesis and research objectives.

Research question

Interest in a particular topic usually begins the research process, but it is the familiarity with the subject that helps define an appropriate research question for a study. 1 Questions then arise out of a perceived knowledge deficit within a subject area or field of study. 2 Indeed, Haynes suggests that it is important to know “where the boundary between current knowledge and ignorance lies.” 1 The challenge in developing an appropriate research question is in determining which clinical uncertainties could or should be studied and also rationalizing the need for their investigation.

Increasing one’s knowledge about the subject of interest can be accomplished in many ways. Appropriate methods include systematically searching the literature, in-depth interviews and focus groups with patients (and proxies) and interviews with experts in the field. In addition, awareness of current trends and technological advances can assist with the development of research questions. 2 It is imperative to understand what has been studied about a topic to date in order to further the knowledge that has been previously gathered on a topic. Indeed, some granting institutions (e.g., Canadian Institute for Health Research) encourage applicants to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence if a recent review does not already exist and preferably a pilot or feasibility study before applying for a grant for a full trial.

In-depth knowledge about a subject may generate a number of questions. It then becomes necessary to ask whether these questions can be answered through one study or if more than one study needed. 1 Additional research questions can be developed, but several basic principles should be taken into consideration. 1 All questions, primary and secondary, should be developed at the beginning and planning stages of a study. Any additional questions should never compromise the primary question because it is the primary research question that forms the basis of the hypothesis and study objectives. It must be kept in mind that within the scope of one study, the presence of a number of research questions will affect and potentially increase the complexity of both the study design and subsequent statistical analyses, not to mention the actual feasibility of answering every question. 1 A sensible strategy is to establish a single primary research question around which to focus the study plan. 3 In a study, the primary research question should be clearly stated at the end of the introduction of the grant proposal, and it usually specifies the population to be studied, the intervention to be implemented and other circumstantial factors. 4

Hulley and colleagues 2 have suggested the use of the FINER criteria in the development of a good research question ( Box 1 ). The FINER criteria highlight useful points that may increase the chances of developing a successful research project. A good research question should specify the population of interest, be of interest to the scientific community and potentially to the public, have clinical relevance and further current knowledge in the field (and of course be compliant with the standards of ethical boards and national research standards).

FINER criteria for a good research question

Adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health. 2

Whereas the FINER criteria outline the important aspects of the question in general, a useful format to use in the development of a specific research question is the PICO format — consider the population (P) of interest, the intervention (I) being studied, the comparison (C) group (or to what is the intervention being compared) and the outcome of interest (O). 3 , 5 , 6 Often timing (T) is added to PICO ( Box 2 ) — that is, “Over what time frame will the study take place?” 1 The PICOT approach helps generate a question that aids in constructing the framework of the study and subsequently in protocol development by alluding to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and identifying the groups of patients to be included. Knowing the specific population of interest, intervention (and comparator) and outcome of interest may also help the researcher identify an appropriate outcome measurement tool. 7 The more defined the population of interest, and thus the more stringent the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the greater the effect on the interpretation and subsequent applicability and generalizability of the research findings. 1 , 2 A restricted study population (and exclusion criteria) may limit bias and increase the internal validity of the study; however, this approach will limit external validity of the study and, thus, the generalizability of the findings to the practical clinical setting. Conversely, a broadly defined study population and inclusion criteria may be representative of practical clinical practice but may increase bias and reduce the internal validity of the study.

PICOT criteria 1

A poorly devised research question may affect the choice of study design, potentially lead to futile situations and, thus, hamper the chance of determining anything of clinical significance, which will then affect the potential for publication. Without devoting appropriate resources to developing the research question, the quality of the study and subsequent results may be compromised. During the initial stages of any research study, it is therefore imperative to formulate a research question that is both clinically relevant and answerable.

Research hypothesis

The primary research question should be driven by the hypothesis rather than the data. 1 , 2 That is, the research question and hypothesis should be developed before the start of the study. This sounds intuitive; however, if we take, for example, a database of information, it is potentially possible to perform multiple statistical comparisons of groups within the database to find a statistically significant association. This could then lead one to work backward from the data and develop the “question.” This is counterintuitive to the process because the question is asked specifically to then find the answer, thus collecting data along the way (i.e., in a prospective manner). Multiple statistical testing of associations from data previously collected could potentially lead to spuriously positive findings of association through chance alone. 2 Therefore, a good hypothesis must be based on a good research question at the start of a trial and, indeed, drive data collection for the study.

The research or clinical hypothesis is developed from the research question and then the main elements of the study — sampling strategy, intervention (if applicable), comparison and outcome variables — are summarized in a form that establishes the basis for testing, statistical and ultimately clinical significance. 3 For example, in a research study comparing computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus freehand acetabular component placement in patients in need of total hip arthroplasty, the experimental group would be computer-assisted insertion and the control/conventional group would be free-hand placement. The investigative team would first state a research hypothesis. This could be expressed as a single outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to improved functional outcome) or potentially as a complex/composite outcome; that is, more than one outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to both improved radiographic cup placement and improved functional outcome).

However, when formally testing statistical significance, the hypothesis should be stated as a “null” hypothesis. 2 The purpose of hypothesis testing is to make an inference about the population of interest on the basis of a random sample taken from that population. The null hypothesis for the preceding research hypothesis then would be that there is no difference in mean functional outcome between the computer-assisted insertion and free-hand placement techniques. After forming the null hypothesis, the researchers would form an alternate hypothesis stating the nature of the difference, if it should appear. The alternate hypothesis would be that there is a difference in mean functional outcome between these techniques. At the end of the study, the null hypothesis is then tested statistically. If the findings of the study are not statistically significant (i.e., there is no difference in functional outcome between the groups in a statistical sense), we cannot reject the null hypothesis, whereas if the findings were significant, we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis (i.e., there is a difference in mean functional outcome between the study groups), errors in testing notwithstanding. In other words, hypothesis testing confirms or refutes the statement that the observed findings did not occur by chance alone but rather occurred because there was a true difference in outcomes between these surgical procedures. The concept of statistical hypothesis testing is complex, and the details are beyond the scope of this article.

Another important concept inherent in hypothesis testing is whether the hypotheses will be 1-sided or 2-sided. A 2-sided hypothesis states that there is a difference between the experimental group and the control group, but it does not specify in advance the expected direction of the difference. For example, we asked whether there is there an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery or whether the outcomes worse with computer-assisted surgery. We presented a 2-sided test in the above example because we did not specify the direction of the difference. A 1-sided hypothesis states a specific direction (e.g., there is an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery). A 2-sided hypothesis should be used unless there is a good justification for using a 1-sided hypothesis. As Bland and Atlman 8 stated, “One-sided hypothesis testing should never be used as a device to make a conventionally nonsignificant difference significant.”

The research hypothesis should be stated at the beginning of the study to guide the objectives for research. Whereas the investigators may state the hypothesis as being 1-sided (there is an improvement with treatment), the study and investigators must adhere to the concept of clinical equipoise. According to this principle, a clinical (or surgical) trial is ethical only if the expert community is uncertain about the relative therapeutic merits of the experimental and control groups being evaluated. 9 It means there must exist an honest and professional disagreement among expert clinicians about the preferred treatment. 9

Designing a research hypothesis is supported by a good research question and will influence the type of research design for the study. Acting on the principles of appropriate hypothesis development, the study can then confidently proceed to the development of the research objective.

Research objective

The primary objective should be coupled with the hypothesis of the study. Study objectives define the specific aims of the study and should be clearly stated in the introduction of the research protocol. 7 From our previous example and using the investigative hypothesis that there is a difference in functional outcomes between computer-assisted acetabular component placement and free-hand placement, the primary objective can be stated as follows: this study will compare the functional outcomes of computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus free-hand placement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Note that the study objective is an active statement about how the study is going to answer the specific research question. Objectives can (and often do) state exactly which outcome measures are going to be used within their statements. They are important because they not only help guide the development of the protocol and design of study but also play a role in sample size calculations and determining the power of the study. 7 These concepts will be discussed in other articles in this series.

From the surgeon’s point of view, it is important for the study objectives to be focused on outcomes that are important to patients and clinically relevant. For example, the most methodologically sound randomized controlled trial comparing 2 techniques of distal radial fixation would have little or no clinical impact if the primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on intraoperative fluoroscopy time. However, if the objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on patient functional outcome at 1 year, this would have a much more significant impact on clinical decision-making. Second, more meaningful surgeon–patient discussions could ensue, incorporating patient values and preferences with the results from this study. 6 , 7 It is the precise objective and what the investigator is trying to measure that is of clinical relevance in the practical setting.

The following is an example from the literature about the relation between the research question, hypothesis and study objectives:

Study: Warden SJ, Metcalf BR, Kiss ZS, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology 2008;47:467–71.

Research question: How does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) compare with a placebo device in managing the symptoms of skeletally mature patients with patellar tendinopathy?

Research hypothesis: Pain levels are reduced in patients who receive daily active-LIPUS (treatment) for 12 weeks compared with individuals who receive inactive-LIPUS (placebo).

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of LIPUS in the management of patellar tendinopathy symptoms.

The development of the research question is the most important aspect of a research project. A research project can fail if the objectives and hypothesis are poorly focused and underdeveloped. Useful tips for surgical researchers are provided in Box 3 . Designing and developing an appropriate and relevant research question, hypothesis and objectives can be a difficult task. The critical appraisal of the research question used in a study is vital to the application of the findings to clinical practice. Focusing resources, time and dedication to these 3 very important tasks will help to guide a successful research project, influence interpretation of the results and affect future publication efforts.

Tips for developing research questions, hypotheses and objectives for research studies

• Perform a systematic literature review (if one has not been done) to increase knowledge and familiarity with the topic and to assist with research development.
• Learn about current trends and technological advances on the topic.
• Seek careful input from experts, mentors, colleagues and collaborators to refine your research question as this will aid in developing the research question and guide the research study.
• Use the FINER criteria in the development of the research question.
• Ensure that the research question follows PICOT format.
• Develop a research hypothesis from the research question.
• Develop clear and well-defined primary and secondary (if needed) objectives.
• Ensure that the research question and objectives are answerable, feasible and clinically relevant.

FINER = feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, relevant; PICOT = population (patients), intervention (for intervention studies only), comparison group, outcome of interest, time.

Competing interests: No funding was received in preparation of this paper. Dr. Bhandari was funded, in part, by a Canada Research Chair, McMaster University.

Research Objectives

Ai generator.

Research objectives are specific goals or purposes that guide a study or investigation. They are clearly defined statements that outline what the researcher aims to achieve through their research . These objectives help to focus the study, provide direction, and establish the scope of the research design . They typically include the main questions or problems the research seeks to address and are essential for designing the methodology, data collection, and analysis processes. By defining research objectives , researchers can ensure their study remains on track and addresses the key issues relevant to their topic.

What Are Research Objectives?

Research objectives are clear, specific goals that guide a study’s direction and scope. They outline what the researcher aims to achieve, helping to focus the research, design methodologies, and guide data collection and analysis. These objectives ensure the research stays on track and addresses key issues relevant to the topic.

Examples of Research Objectives

• To determine the impact of social media on adolescent mental health.
• To analyze the effectiveness of online learning platforms in primary education.
• To investigate the relationship between diet and cognitive function in adults.
• To assess customer satisfaction with a new product line.
• To explore the effects of climate change on local agriculture.
• To identify key factors influencing employee job satisfaction in the tech industry.
• To evaluate the success of a community health intervention program.
• To compare the environmental benefits of electric vs. hybrid vehicles.
• To examine the role of leadership styles in organizational performance.
• To measure the economic impact of tourism in a specific region.

Examples of Qualitative Research Objectives

• To explore the experiences of patients undergoing chronic pain management.
• To understand the perceptions of teachers on the integration of technology in the classroom.
• To investigate the motivations behind volunteerism in community service organizations.
• To examine the cultural influences on dietary habits among immigrant families.
• To assess the impact of workplace culture on employee morale in remote teams.
• To identify the challenges faced by first-generation college students in higher education.
• To analyze the role of social support networks in the lives of single parents.
• To study the decision-making processes of consumers when choosing organic products.
• To explore the lived experiences of individuals recovering from addiction.
• To understand the factors influencing career choices among high school students.

Examples of Research Objectives in a Research Proposal

• To investigate the effects of social media usage on high school students’ academic performance.
• To explore the relationship between work-life balance and job satisfaction among healthcare professionals.
• To assess the impact of urban green spaces on residents’ mental health in metropolitan areas.
• To analyze the effectiveness of bilingual education programs in enhancing language proficiency among elementary students.
• To determine the influence of corporate social responsibility initiatives on consumer loyalty in the retail industry.
• To examine the role of leadership styles in fostering innovation within technology startups.
• To identify barriers to accessing healthcare services in rural communities.
• To evaluate the success of digital marketing strategies in small businesses.
• To understand the factors affecting voter turnout in local elections.
• To study the impact of remote work on team collaboration and productivity in the IT sector.

Research Objectives in Business

• To evaluate the effectiveness of digital marketing strategies in increasing online sales.
• To analyze customer satisfaction levels with the company’s new product line.
• To investigate the impact of employee training programs on productivity.
• To determine the key factors influencing consumer purchasing decisions in the retail industry.
• To assess the role of corporate social responsibility in enhancing brand reputation.
• To explore the relationship between workplace diversity and employee performance.
• To examine the effects of remote work on team collaboration and company culture.
• To identify market trends and opportunities for business expansion in emerging markets.
• To study the influence of pricing strategies on customer retention and loyalty.
• To measure the impact of leadership styles on organizational innovation and growth.

Why are Research Objectives Important?

Research objectives are crucial because they provide clear direction and focus for a study, ensuring that the research stays on track and addresses the specific goals set by the researcher. They help in the formulation of research questions and the design of the methodology, guiding data collection and analysis processes. Well-defined objectives make it easier to measure the study’s success and ensure that the findings are relevant and meaningful. They also enhance the credibility and reliability of the research by outlining a precise plan, making it easier for others to understand and replicate the study.

Importance of Research Objectives

• Provide Clarity and Focus: Research objectives clearly outline what the study aims to achieve, helping to narrow down the scope and maintain a clear direction throughout the research process.
• Guide Research Design: They help in formulating research questions and determining the most appropriate methodology, ensuring that data collection and analysis are aligned with the study’s goals.
• Ensure Relevance: Well-defined objectives ensure that the research addresses specific, relevant issues, making the findings more meaningful and applicable.
• Measure Success: They provide benchmarks against which the success of the study can be measured, making it easier to assess whether the research has achieved its intended goals.
• Enhance Credibility: Clearly stated objectives enhance the credibility and reliability of the research by demonstrating a systematic and organized approach.

Types of Research Objectives

1. Descriptive Objectives

Descriptive objectives aim to describe the characteristics or functions of a particular phenomenon or population. These objectives focus on answering the “what” aspect of research. Example : To describe the demographic characteristics of smartphone users in the United States.

2. Exploratory Objectives

Exploratory objectives aim to explore new areas where little information is available. They seek to gain insights and familiarize the researcher with the subject area. Example : To explore the potential factors influencing consumer preferences for electric vehicles.

3. Explanatory Objectives

Explanatory objectives aim to explain the relationships or causality between variables. These objectives focus on understanding the “why” and “how” aspects of research. Example : To explain the relationship between social media usage and academic performance among college students.

4. Predictive Objectives

Predictive objectives aim to predict the future trends, behaviors, or outcomes based on current data or trends. These objectives are used to forecast and anticipate future scenarios. Example : To predict the impact of climate change on agricultural productivity over the next decade.

5. Evaluative Objectives

Evaluative objectives aim to assess the effectiveness or impact of an intervention, program, or policy. These objectives focus on determining the success or value of something. Example : To evaluate the effectiveness of a new employee training program on job performance.

Characteristics of Research Objectives

Research objectives are crucial components of any study as they define the purpose and goals of the research. Well-crafted research objectives provide clarity, direction, and focus to the study. Here are the key characteristics of research objectives:

1. Specific

Research objectives should be clear and precise, leaving no room for ambiguity. They should clearly state what the research intends to achieve. Example: Specific Objective: “To determine the impact of social media marketing on consumer purchasing decisions.”

2. Measurable

Objectives should be quantifiable, allowing researchers to assess the extent to which they have been achieved. This involves using metrics or indicators that can be measured. Example: Measurable Objective: “To measure the increase in sales by 15% after implementing a social media marketing campaign.”

3. Achievable

The objectives should be realistic and attainable within the scope and resources of the study. Setting achievable goals ensures that the research can be completed successfully. Example: Achievable Objective: “To survey 500 consumers within a three-month period to understand their social media usage patterns.”

4. Relevant

Objectives must be relevant to the research problem and aligned with the overall purpose of the study. They should address the key issues and contribute to solving the research problem. Example: Relevant Objective: “To analyze the relationship between social media engagement and brand loyalty among teenagers.”

5. Time-bound

Objectives should have a clear timeframe within which they are to be achieved. This helps in planning and maintaining the research schedule. Example: Time-bound Objective: “To complete data collection within six months and publish findings within one year.”

How to write Research Objectives?

1. identify the research problem.

• Clearly define the research problem.
• Understand the main issue or question you want to address.

2. Conduct a Literature Review

• Review existing literature to understand what has already been done in the field.
• Refine your research problem and identify gaps.

3. Define the Scope of Your Study

• Determine the boundaries of your research.
• Specify what aspects of the problem you will address and what you will exclude.

4. Formulate Specific Questions

• Break down your research problem into specific, clear, and focused questions.

5. Use Action Verbs

• Use specific action verbs such as “analyze,” “determine,” “evaluate,” “explore,” and “compare” to articulate your aims.

6. Be Clear and Concise

• Ensure your objectives are clear, concise, and easy to understand.
• Avoid ambiguous language and make each objective specific and measurable.

7. Align with Research Goals

• Ensure that your objectives are aligned with the overall goals of your research.
• Each objective should contribute to achieving these goals.

8. Prioritize Objectives

• List your objectives in order of importance.
• Focus on primary objectives first, followed by secondary ones.

9. Ensure Feasibility

• Make sure your objectives are realistic and achievable within the scope of your resources, time, and capabilities.

10. Review and Refine

• Review your objectives to ensure they are comprehensive and cover all aspects of your research problem.
• Refine them as necessary for clarity and focus.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Research Objectives

Advantages of research objectives.

• Clarity and Focus Objectives provide a clear direction, helping you stay on track. Example: “To study the impact of social media on teenagers’ mental health” keeps your research focused on a specific topic.
• Guidance for Methodology They help in choosing the right methods and tools for your research. Example: “To test the effectiveness of new teaching methods” suggests using experiments and tests.
• Measurement and Evaluation Objectives make it easy to measure success. Example: “To improve test scores by 15% with a new teaching method” provides a clear goal to aim for.
• Resource Allocation They ensure efficient use of time, money, and effort. Example: If your objective is “To survey 500 people,” you can plan your resources accordingly.
• Communication Objectives help explain your research to others. Example: Clear objectives can be shared in grant proposals to get funding.

Disadvantages of Research Objectives

• Rigidity Objectives can be too rigid, limiting flexibility. Example: If new data shows something unexpected, a fixed objective might stop you from exploring it.
• Over-Simplification They might oversimplify complex issues. Example: “To study the effect of diet on health” might ignore the many factors that influence health.
• Bias Introduction Specific objectives can lead to focusing too narrowly. Example: Studying only the positive effects of a new drug might overlook side effects.
• Pressure to Achieve They can create pressure to meet specific outcomes, risking research integrity. Example: You might feel pressured to show that a new teaching method works, even if it doesn’t.
• Resource Constraints Some objectives may require more resources than available. Example: “To survey 1,000 people” might be hard if you have limited funds.

FAQ’s

Why are research objectives important.

Research objectives provide direction and focus for the study, ensuring that the research stays on track and addresses relevant questions.

How do you formulate research objectives?

Formulate research objectives by identifying key questions your research aims to answer, ensuring they are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

What is the difference between research objectives and research questions?

Research objectives outline the goals of the study, while research questions specify what the researcher aims to find out.

Can research objectives change during the study?

Yes, research objectives can be refined or adjusted as the study progresses, especially if new insights emerge.

How many research objectives should a study have?

The number of research objectives depends on the scope of the study but typically ranges from two to five.

How do research objectives relate to hypotheses?

Research objectives guide the study, while hypotheses are testable predictions derived from these objectives.

Can research objectives be qualitative or quantitative?

Yes, research objectives can be either qualitative, focusing on understanding phenomena, or quantitative, focusing on measuring variables.

How do you prioritize research objectives?

Prioritize research objectives based on their relevance to the research problem and feasibility within the study’s constraints.

What role do research objectives play in a literature review?

Research objectives help structure the literature review, guiding the selection of relevant studies and identifying gaps in existing research.

How do research objectives influence data collection?

Research objectives determine the type of data needed and the appropriate methods for collecting this data.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Click here to place an order for topic brief service to get instant approval from your professor.

Crafting Effective Research Objectives: A Comprehensive Guide with Examples for Success

Table of Contents

Unlock Your Thesis Potential with Clear Research Objectives Examples

Feeling overwhelmed with your thesis or dissertation is your research scattered in all directions, leaving you confused about where to start, fear not the key to a successful research journey lies in crafting precise dissertation objectives. once you’ve defined the research objectives for your study, the rest will fall into place effortlessly., discover exceptional examples of research objectives.

Before delving into the world of research objectives, let’s grasp the significance of these guiding stars in your academic voyage.

The Essence of Research Objectives

Research objectives serve as the compass of your study. They are concise statements that illuminate the purpose of your research and its variables. In essence, they are the beating heart of your dissertation, charting its course and highlighting potential research challenges.

Why Research Objectives Matter

Writing clear research objectives is a pivotal step in any investigative study. These objectives provide a roadmap for the entire research process, from data collection to analysis and beyond.

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Objectives

There are two main types of research objectives: primary quantitative and secondary qualitative. These objectives define what the researcher aims to achieve in their study and are crafted after the research problem has been identified. They give meaning to your research and offer insights into solving the research problem.

Quantitative Research Objectives

In the realm of quantitative research, the focus is on establishing concrete relationships between variables using mathematical and statistical data. This approach relies on precise methods like questionnaires and surveys for data collection. The objectives here are objectives themselves, with a narrow and measurable focus.

Quantitative Research Objective Examples:

• Determine the correlation between study time and student grades.
• Predict how increasing bullying incidents impact student dropout rates.
• Assess the influence of growing student assignments on academic performance.
• Examine the effects of rising petroleum prices on consumer goods consumption.
• Investigate the impact of economic recessions on national GDP.
• To analyze the correlation between employee satisfaction scores and productivity metrics within a corporate setting.
• To quantify the impact of a new marketing strategy on customer acquisition and retention rates in a specific market segment.
• To assess the effectiveness of a wellness program in reducing blood pressure levels among participants over a six-month period.
• To measure the relationship between social media engagement and brand loyalty in the context of an e-commerce platform.
• To determine the statistical significance of the association between study habits and academic performance among undergraduate students.

Qualitative Research Objectives

Qualitative research, on the other hand, delves into individual behaviors and preferences. It gathers data through open-ended questions that offer a deeper understanding of complex topics. The objectives in qualitative research are subjective and explore broader, intricate subjects.

Qualitative Research Objective Examples:

• Assess customer satisfaction levels in a hotel.
• Identify the motivating factors behind societal crime rates.
• Explore factors that boost children’s self-confidence.
• Investigate the influence of media on the health of teenage girls.
• To explore the lived experiences of individuals coping with chronic illness and the impact on their quality of life.
• To understand the perceptions and cultural influences shaping consumer attitudes towards sustainable fashion choices.
• To uncover the underlying motivations and decision-making processes of entrepreneurs in the tech startup ecosystem.
• To examine the social dynamics and interpersonal relationships within a close-knit community undergoing urban redevelopment.
• To capture the nuances of employee perceptions regarding workplace inclusivity and its influence on job satisfaction.
• To delve into the subjective experiences of caregivers providing support to individuals with neurodegenerative diseases.

Tailoring Your Research Objectives

Research objectives serve as concise summaries of the data categories you aim to collect. For market research, these objectives could include areas such as brand awareness, consumer perception, buyer behavior, and more. Customize your objectives to suit the specific goals of your project.

Take Action and Succeed

Ready to unlock your academic potential.

Don’t hesitate to seek assistance from our experts. We offer a 25% discount on assignments and dissertations, including crafting precise research objectives that can propel you toward your degree with flying colors. Don’t miss out on this opportunity to excel!

Testimonials

Unlock the secrets to crafting stellar dissertation objectives, as acclaimed by UK students! Hear their testimonials praising the invaluable guidance in formulating clear, impactful research objectives. From elucidating quantitative goals to refining qualitative aims, our services have empowered UK students to navigate the intricate landscape of dissertations successfully. Join this chorus of satisfied students who credit dissertation help for transforming their dissertation journeys into triumphs.

“Sarah’s Feedback:

The research objectives examples provided here were a game-changer for my thesis. They helped me shape my study’s direction, and the clear explanations made it easy to understand their importance. I highly recommend these research objectives samples to anyone looking to excel in their research.”

“John’s Feedback:

Finding concrete examples of research objectives in a research proposal can be challenging, but this resource made it a breeze. The objectives of the study examples were comprehensive and insightful, giving me a solid foundation to build upon for my own research. Thank you!”

“Emma’s Review:

I was struggling to formulate research objectives for my dissertation until I stumbled upon these examples of research objectives. The clarity and variety, including quantitative research objectives, were exactly what I needed to kickstart my project. Highly recommended!”

“Michael’s Experience:

Crafting research objectives can be a daunting task, but this collection of research objectives samples made it so much easier. I found the objective of the study examples particularly helpful in defining the purpose of my research. A fantastic resource!”

“Olivia’s Success Story:

These examples of research objectives in a research proposal are a goldmine for researchers. The objective of the study in research examples provided a roadmap for my project, and I couldn’t be happier with the results. Don’t miss out on this valuable resource!”

“Daniel’s Gratitude:

Struggling to create clear research objectives? Look no further! These research objectives examples are a lifesaver. Whether you need quantitative or qualitative objectives, this resource has it all. I’m grateful for the guidance it provided in shaping my research.”

“Sophia’s Recommendation:

I was searching for the objective of the study examples to enhance the clarity of my research proposal. These research objectives examples were exactly what I needed. They not only clarified my research direction but also helped me optimize my study for success. Highly recommended!”

“David’s Insight:

If you’re looking for an example of research objectives that stands out, this is it. These research objectives samples cover a wide range of topics and research approaches, making them a valuable asset for any researcher. Don’t miss the chance to boost your research with these insights!”

Paid Topic Mini Proposal (500 Words)

You will get the topics first and then the mini proposal which includes:

• An explanation why we choose this topic.
• 2-3 research questions.
• Key literature resources identification.
• Suitable methodology including raw sample size and data collection method
• View a Sample of Service

Note: After submitting your order please must check your email [inbox/spam] folders for order confirmation and login details. If the email goes in spam please mark not as spam to avoid any communication gap between us.

Get An Expert Dissertation Writing Help To Achieve Good Grades

By placing an order with us, you can get;

• Writer consultation before payment to ensure your work is in safe hands.
• Free topic if you don't have one
• Draft submissions to check the quality of the work as per supervisor's feedback
• Free revisions
• Complete privacy
• Plagiarism Free work
• Guaranteed 2:1 (With help of your supervisor's feedback)
• 2 Instalments plan
• Special discounts

Other Posts

• 45 Human Rights Dissertation Topics Ideas & Examples February 7, 2020 -->
• 49 Risk Management Dissertation Topics Ideas & examples February 27, 2020 -->
• 49 Waste Management Dissertation Topics Ideas February 27, 2020 -->
• 53 Best Dissertation topics on domestic violence & Examples November 30, 2021 -->
• 53 Sports Dissertation Topics and examples in 2023 March 17, 2020 -->
• 56 Best Critical Care Nursing Research Topics ideas with examples November 18, 2021 -->
• 57 Best Ecommerce Research Topics Ideas and Examples November 30, 2021 -->
• 57 Best Forensic Science Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 17, 2020 -->
• 57 Best Real Estate Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 16, 2020 -->
• 57+ Best Health and Social Care Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 16, 2020 -->
• 59 Anthropology Dissertation Topics Ideas & Examples March 17, 2020 -->
• 62 Ideas for English Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 13, 2020 -->
• 63 Graphic Design Dissertation Topics Ideas February 7, 2020 -->
• 63+ Best Communications dissertation Topics in 2023 March 11, 2020 -->
• 87 Dementia dissertation topics in nursing November 18, 2021 -->
• 99 Microfinance Dissertation Topics Ideas & Examples February 26, 2020 -->
• Animation Topics for Writing a Perfect Animation Dissertation February 4, 2020 -->
• Best 29 Music Dissertation Topics Ideas & Examples February 26, 2020 -->
• Best 35 Cultural Studies Dissertation Topics March 13, 2020 -->
• Best 39 Photography Dissertation Topics and Ideas in 2023 February 26, 2020 -->
• Best 49 Social Policy Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 16, 2020 -->
• Best 49 Sports Psychology Dissertation Topics Ideas February 27, 2020 -->
• Best 53+ Geography Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 17, 2020 -->
• Best 59 Engineering Dissertation Topics Ideas and Examples February 6, 2020 -->
• Best 59 Networking Dissertation Topics Ideas & Examples February 26, 2020 -->
• Best Art dissertation Topics and ideas in 2023 March 11, 2020 -->
• Best Construction Dissertation Topics, Ideas, and Samples March 13, 2020 -->
• Best Environmental Science Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 16, 2020 -->
• Best Film Studies Dissertation Topics in 2023 March 16, 2020 -->
• Best French Dissertation Topics and Ideas 2023 April 1, 2020 -->

WhatsApp and Get 35% off promo code now!

Crafting Clear Pathways: Writing Objectives in Research Papers

Struggling to write research objectives? Follow our easy steps to learn how to craft effective and compelling objectives in research papers.

Are you struggling to define the goals and direction of your research? Are you losing yourself while doing research and tend to go astray from the intended research topic? Fear not, as many face the same problem and it is quite understandable to overcome this, a concept called research objective comes into play here.

In this article, we’ll delve into the world of the objectives in research papers and why they are essential for a successful study. We will be studying what they are and how they are used in research.

What is a Research Objective?

A research objective is a clear and specific goal that a researcher aims to achieve through a research study. It serves as a roadmap for the research, providing direction and focus. Research objectives are formulated based on the research questions or hypotheses, and they help in defining the scope of the study and guiding the research design and methodology. They also assist in evaluating the success and outcomes of the research.

Types of Research Objectives

There are typically three main types of objectives in a research paper:

• Exploratory Objectives: These objectives are focused on gaining a deeper understanding of a particular phenomenon, topic, or issue. Exploratory research objectives aim to explore and identify new ideas, insights, or patterns that were previously unknown or poorly understood. This type of objective is commonly used in preliminary or qualitative studies.
• Descriptive Objectives: Descriptive objectives seek to describe and document the characteristics, behaviors, or attributes of a specific population, event, or phenomenon. The purpose is to provide a comprehensive and accurate account of the subject of study. Descriptive research objectives often involve collecting and analyzing data through surveys, observations, or archival research.
• Explanatory or Causal Objectives: Explanatory objectives aim to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables or factors. These objectives focus on understanding why certain events or phenomena occur and how they are related to each other. 

Also Read: What are the types of research?

Steps for Writing Objectives in Research Paper

1. identify the research topic:.

Clearly define the subject or topic of your research. This will provide a broad context for developing specific research objectives.

2. Conduct a Literature Review

Review existing literature and research related to your topic. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge, identify any research gaps, and refine your research objectives accordingly.

3. Identify the Research Questions or Hypotheses

Formulate specific research questions or hypotheses that you want to address in your study. These questions should be directly related to your research topic and guide the development of your research objectives.

4. Focus on Specific Goals

Break down the broader research questions or hypothesis into specific goals or objectives. Each objective should focus on a particular aspect of your research topic and be achievable within the scope of your study.

5. Use Clear and Measurable Language

Write your research objectives using clear and precise language. Avoid vague terms and use specific and measurable terms that can be observed, analyzed, or measured.

6. Consider Feasibility

Ensure that your research objectives are feasible within the available resources, time constraints, and ethical considerations. They should be realistic and attainable given the limitations of your study.

7. Prioritize Objectives

If you have multiple research objectives, prioritize them based on their importance and relevance to your overall research goals. This will help you allocate resources and focus your efforts accordingly.

8. Review and Refine

Review your research objectives to ensure they align with your research questions or hypotheses, and revise them if necessary. Seek feedback from peers or advisors to ensure clarity and coherence.

Tips for Writing Objectives in Research Paper

1. be clear and specific.

Clearly state what you intend to achieve with your research. Use specific language that leaves no room for ambiguity or confusion. This ensures that your objectives are well-defined and focused.

2. Use Action Verbs

Begin each research objective with an action verb that describes a measurable action or outcome. This helps make your objectives more actionable and measurable.

3. Align with Research Questions or Hypotheses

Your research objectives should directly address the research questions or hypotheses you have formulated. Ensure there is a clear connection between them to maintain coherence in your study.

4. Be Realistic and Feasible

Set research objectives that are attainable within the constraints of your study, including available resources, time, and ethical considerations. Unrealistic objectives may undermine the validity and reliability of your research.

5. Consider Relevance and Significance

Your research objectives should be relevant to your research topic and contribute to the broader field of study. Consider the potential impact and significance of achieving the objectives.

SMART Goals for Writing Research Objectives

To ensure that your research objectives are well-defined and effectively guide your study, you can apply the SMART framework. SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Here’s how you can make your research objectives SMART:

• Specific : Clearly state what you want to achieve in a precise and specific manner. Avoid vague or generalized language. Specify the population, variables, or phenomena of interest.
• Measurable : Ensure that your research objectives can be quantified or observed in a measurable way. This allows for objective evaluation and assessment of progress.
• Achievable : Set research objectives that are realistic and attainable within the available resources, time, and scope of your study. Consider the feasibility of conducting the research and collecting the necessary data.
• Relevant : Ensure that your research objectives are directly relevant to your research topic and contribute to the broader knowledge or understanding of the field. They should align with the purpose and significance of your study.
• Time-bound : Set a specific timeframe or deadline for achieving your research objectives. This helps create a sense of urgency and provides a clear timeline for your study.

Examples of Research Objectives

Here are some examples of research objectives from various fields of study:

• To examine the relationship between social media usage and self-esteem among young adults aged 18-25 in order to understand the potential impact on mental well-being.
• To assess the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention in reducing stress levels and improving coping mechanisms among individuals diagnosed with anxiety disorders.
• To investigate the factors influencing consumer purchasing decisions in the e-commerce industry, with a focus on the role of online reviews and social media influencers.
• To analyze the effects of climate change on the biodiversity of coral reefs in a specific region, using remote sensing techniques and field surveys.

Importance of Research Objectives

Research objectives play a crucial role in the research process and hold significant importance for several reasons:

• Guiding the Research Process: Research objectives provide a clear roadmap for the entire research process. They help researchers stay focused and on track, ensuring that the study remains purposeful and relevant. 
• Defining the Scope of the Study: Research objectives help in determining the boundaries and scope of the study. They clarify what aspects of the research topic will be explored and what will be excluded. 
• Providing Direction for Data Collection and Analysis: Research objectives assist in identifying the type of data to be collected and the methods of data collection. They also guide the selection of appropriate data analysis techniques. 
• Evaluating the Success of the Study: Research objectives serve as benchmarks for evaluating the success and outcomes of the research. They provide measurable criteria against which the researcher can assess whether the objectives have been met or not. 
• Enhancing Communication and Collaboration: Clearly defined research objectives facilitate effective communication and collaboration among researchers, advisors, and stakeholders. 

Common Mistakes to Avoid While Writing Research Objectives

When writing research objectives, it’s important to be aware of common mistakes and pitfalls that can undermine the effectiveness and clarity of your objectives. Here are some common mistakes to avoid:

• Vague or Ambiguous Language: One of the key mistakes is using vague or ambiguous language that lacks specificity. Ensure that your research objectives are clearly and precisely stated, leaving no room for misinterpretation or confusion.
• Lack of Measurability: Research objectives should be measurable, meaning that they should allow for the collection of data or evidence that can be quantified or observed. Avoid setting objectives that cannot be measured or assessed objectively.
• Lack of Alignment with Research Questions or Hypotheses: Your research objectives should directly align with the research questions or hypotheses you have formulated. Make sure there is a clear connection between them to maintain coherence in your study.
• Overgeneralization : Avoid writing research objectives that are too broad or encompass too many variables or phenomena. Overgeneralized objectives may lead to a lack of focus or feasibility in conducting the research.
• Unrealistic or Unattainable Objectives: Ensure that your research objectives are realistic and attainable within the available resources, time, and scope of your study. Setting unrealistic objectives may compromise the validity and reliability of your research.

In conclusion, research objectives are integral to the success and effectiveness of any research study. They provide a clear direction, focus, and purpose, guiding the entire research process from start to finish. By formulating specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound objectives, researchers can define the scope of their study, guide data collection and analysis, and evaluate the outcomes of their research.

Turn your data into easy-to-understand and dynamic stories

When you wish to explain any complex data, it’s always advised to break it down into simpler visuals or stories. This is where Mind the Graph comes in. It is a platform that helps researchers and scientists to turn their data into easy-to-understand and dynamic stories, helping the audience understand the concepts better. Sign Up now to explore the library of scientific infographics. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.

Sign Up for Free

Try the best infographic maker and promote your research with scientifically-accurate beautiful figures

no credit card required

About Sowjanya Pedada

Sowjanya is a passionate writer and an avid reader. She holds MBA in Agribusiness Management and now is working as a content writer. She loves to play with words and hopes to make a difference in the world through her writings. Apart from writing, she is interested in reading fiction novels and doing craftwork. She also loves to travel and explore different cuisines and spend time with her family and friends.

Content tags

Quantitative Research

• Reference work entry
• First Online: 13 January 2019
• Cite this reference work entry

• Leigh A. Wilson 2 , 3  

5241 Accesses

4 Citations

Quantitative research methods are concerned with the planning, design, and implementation of strategies to collect and analyze data. Descartes, the seventeenth-century philosopher, suggested that how the results are achieved is often more important than the results themselves, as the journey taken along the research path is a journey of discovery. High-quality quantitative research is characterized by the attention given to the methods and the reliability of the tools used to collect the data. The ability to critique research in a systematic way is an essential component of a health professional’s role in order to deliver high quality, evidence-based healthcare. This chapter is intended to provide a simple overview of the way new researchers and health practitioners can understand and employ quantitative methods. The chapter offers practical, realistic guidance in a learner-friendly way and uses a logical sequence to understand the process of hypothesis development, study design, data collection and handling, and finally data analysis and interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Writing Quantitative Research Studies

Qualitative Research Methods

Babbie ER. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage; 2016.

Google Scholar  

Descartes. Cited in Halverston, W. (1976). In: A concise introduction to philosophy, 3rd ed. New York: Random House; 1637.

Doll R, Hill AB. The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits. BMJ. 1954;328(7455):1529–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1529 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017.

McNabb DE. Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: quantitative and qualitative approaches. 2nd ed. New York: Armonk; 2007.

Merriam-Webster. Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com . Accessed 20th December 2017.

Olesen Larsen P, von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 2010;84(3):575–603.

Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc .

Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Publishing; 2009.

Sheehan J. Aspects of research methodology. Nurse Educ Today. 1986;6:193–203.

Wilson LA, Black DA. Health, science research and research methods. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

Leigh A. Wilson

Faculty of Health Science, Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leigh A. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Wilson, L.A. (2019). Quantitative Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_54

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_54

Published : 13 January 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-10-5250-7

Online ISBN : 978-981-10-5251-4

eBook Packages : Social Sciences Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Quantitative Observation: Everything You Need To Know

What’s the best way to gather data that doesn’t leave you second-guessing?

If you’re dealing with research, you know how important it is to get solid, reliable data.

That’s where quantitative observation steps in.

In this article, we’ll look into everything you need to know about quantitative observation.

We’ll cover what it is, how it’s different from qualitative observation, and why it’s so widely used across various fields like education, healthcare, and marketing.

By the end, you’ll see why this method is a go-to for researchers who need precise, measurable results:

What is quantitative observation?

Quantitative observation is a research method that involves collecting and analyzing numerical data about people, objects, or events. It’s often used to measure specific variables, such as frequency, duration, or intensity. Quantitative observation can be conducted in various settings, including laboratories, classrooms, and public places.

Quantitative and qualitative observation – what’s the difference?

When it comes to research, you’ll often hear about two main types of observations: quantitative and qualitative .

Both have their place, but they’re pretty different in what they focus on and how they’re used.

Let’s break it down.

Focus on numbers vs. descriptions

Quantitative observations are all about numbers. If you can count it, measure it, or express it in figures, it falls into the quantitative camp.

Think of things like:

• the temperature of a room,
• the number of people in a line,
• or the speed of a car.

This type of observation gives you hard data that you can analyze and compare.

On the other hand, qualitative observations focus on descriptions. They’re about the qualities of what you’re observing.

For example, instead of saying, “The car is going 60 mph,” you’d say, “The car is moving quickly.” It’s more about what something is like than how much there is of it.

Objectivity vs. subjectivity

Quantitative observations are usually more objective. The data you gather isn’t influenced by opinions or feelings – it’s just numbers . This makes it reliable when you’re looking for facts that can be backed up by statistical analysis.

Qualitative observations, however, are more subjective.

They depend on the observer’s perspective and interpretation. Two people might describe the same event differently, which can make this type of observation more varied and rich, but also less consistent.

Measurable data vs. rich detail

When you gather quantitative data, you’re looking for specific measurements.

This might include things like:

• or quantity.

It’s precise and can be used in graphs, charts, and statistical models.

Qualitative data, though, is more about the details that don’t fit into neat little boxes.

It includes things like colors, textures, feelings, and experiences. This data is harder to measure, but it adds depth and context to your research.

Standardization vs. flexibility

Quantitative observation methods are usually standardized. You use the same tools and processes each time to make sure your data is consistent. This is great for making comparisons across different studies or groups.

Qualitative observation, in contrast, is more flexible. It allows you to explore your subject in a more open-ended way, which can lead to new insights and understanding that you might miss with a more rigid approach.

So, whether you’re counting heads or describing feelings, both quantitative and qualitative observations play important roles in research. Each brings something valuable to the table, helping you see the full picture.

Comparison table

You may also like:

Qualitative vs quantitative survey data

How to analyze survey data

What is non-response bias?

The benefits of quantitative observations

Quantitative observation has attractive advantages, and the most important ones are:

It provides objective and reliable data that can be analyzed statistically

When you’re collecting quantitative observation data, you’re gathering facts that are clear-cut and free from personal bias.

This makes the data objective and reliable, which is a big deal in scientific research.

With these numbers in hand, you can engage in statistical analysis, where patterns and relationships start to emerge.

The beauty of this approach is that it strips away guesswork, leaving you with solid evidence that can back up your findings.

Unlike qualitative observation, which leans on descriptions, quantitative observations give you something concrete to work with.

It allows for precise measurement and comparison of variables

When it comes to measuring and comparing variables, quantitative research is the tool of choice.

Quantitative observation methods focus on capturing exact values – whether it’s the height of a plant, the number of customers, or the temperature of a liquid.

This precision is key in the research process because it lets you compare different factors head-to-head.

With standardized observation techniques, the data you gather is consistent and reliable across the board.

It doesn’t matter if you’re working on a big project or just trying to understand a small detail, quantitative observations help you keep everything measured and comparable.

It can be used to test hypotheses and identify patterns and trends

In scientific research, testing hypotheses is a key part of the job.

Quantitative observation research plays a huge role here.

Thanks to gathering quantitative data through systematic observation, you can put your ideas to the test.

The numbers you collect can either support your hypothesis or show you where things aren’t adding up.

Plus, as you gather more data, you start to see patterns and trends that weren’t obvious at first.

This is where quantitative and qualitative observation work hand in hand.

The hard numbers from quantitative research point you in the right direction, while qualitative observations add the context you need to understand the bigger picture.

How to do survey research?

What is cross-sectional data?

What is nominal data?

Where is quantitative observation applied? Top use cases

Quantitative observation can be used in a variety of fields, including:

Marketing: measuring customer behavior and preferences

Imagine a store tracking how many customers stop to look at a new product display or how long they spend browsing a particular aisle.

These numbers tell a story about what catches people’s attention and what doesn’t.

For instance, a study published in the International Journal of Advertising explored the effectiveness of retail window displays as part of the marketing mix.

The researchers worked with Boots the Chemists and Nottingham Business School to measure how window display design influences consumer-buying behavior.

They found that connecting buying behavior to specific marketing elements, like window displays, made sales forecasting more predictable.

If a lot of people are lingering by a new clothing line but not buying, it might suggest they’re interested but need a nudge, maybe a sale or better positioning.

This kind of data helps businesses tweak their strategies to match customer behavior.

Education: assessing student engagement and learning outcomes

In education, teachers often use quantitative observation to see how students are engaging with their lessons.

For example, a study presented in the Journal of Educational Psychology introduced the Behavioral Engagement Related to Instruction (BERI) protocol.

This protocol was specifically designed for large university classrooms to measure student engagement levels through quantitative observation data.

The BERI protocol involves tracking student behaviors in real-time, offering teachers immediate feedback on how well students are engaging with the material.

For instance, if students are actively participating in discussions or focusing on tasks during lectures, the data collected can show high levels of engagement.

On the other hand, if students appear distracted or disengaged, the data can highlight areas where the teaching method might need adjustment.

These numbers help educators identify which teaching strategies are working and which might need a different approach. If the protocol shows that students are more engaged during interactive lessons compared to traditional lectures, it indicates a need to incorporate more interactive elements into the curriculum.

This kind of targeted feedback helps instructors refine their methods to improve student learning outcomes.

Psychology: studying human behavior and cognition

Psychologists use quantitative observation to dig into the details of human behavior.

For example, a well-known study in the field of memory research conducted by Ebbinghaus in the late 19th century focused on how quickly people forget information.

In this study, participants were asked to memorize lists of nonsense syllables, and then their recall was tested at different time intervals.

The researchers measured how many syllables participants could remember after varying lengths of time, such as immediately after learning, after a few hours, and after several days.

The numbers collected from these tests helped to map out the “forgetting curve,” which shows that memory retention decreases sharply soon after learning but then levels off over time.

This type of quantitative data is often used in psychology, as it helps researchers understand how memory works and how factors like stress or fatigue might impact recall.

Sociology: investigating social phenomena and trends

In sociology, quantitative observation helps researchers understand broader social trends.

A notable study published in the American Political Science Review examined voting behavior across various neighborhoods in a large metropolitan area.

The researchers collected quantitative data on voter turnout by tracking the number of people who participated in elections in different districts over several election cycles.

The study revealed that neighborhoods with lower voter turnout often had higher levels of economic disadvantage, lower educational attainment, and less access to transportation.

These patterns were not immediately obvious without the data. By analyzing the numbers, sociologists were able to identify the social factors that contributed to lower voting rates.

This type of research helps sociologists understand the underlying reasons for such trends and suggests potential interventions.

For instance, the findings might prompt community programs aimed at increasing voter education or improving access to polling stations.

Quantitative observation in sociology is essential for uncovering these hidden patterns and driving efforts to address social inequalities.

Healthcare: evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatments and interventions

In healthcare, quantitative observation is useful for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatments.

A well-known example is the clinical trial of the drug Streptomycin in the treatment of tuberculosis, conducted in the late 1940s.

This was one of the first randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in medical history, which set the standard for future clinical research.

In this study, researchers quantitatively observed and recorded the number of patients who showed improvement in their tuberculosis symptoms after taking Streptomycin compared to those who received a placebo.

The results showed a statistically significant improvement in the recovery rates among those treated with the drug, confirming its effectiveness.

This study provided clear evidence of the drug’s efficacy, shaping the future of tuberculosis treatment and demonstrating the power of quantitative observation in healthcare.

Thanks to systematically tracking patient outcomes, healthcare professionals were able to make informed decisions about adopting Streptomycin as a standard treatment.

6 great customer feedback examples

8 close-ended questions examples for better market research

What is semantic differential scale?

SurveyLab for quantitative observation – how does it work?

SurveyLab is a tool that takes quantitative observation to the next level.

If you’re looking to gather precise data and gain deep insights, this platform has you covered.

With SurveyLab, you can create online tests that score automatically and make data collection straightforward.

It doesn’t matter if you’re measuring customer satisfaction, employee engagement, or any other metric, the platform’s scoring mechanism helps you keep everything in check.

• One of the standout features is the ability to set up complex satisfaction indicators and key performance indicators (KPIs). These metrics give you a clear picture of what’s working and what needs attention.
• Plus, with the advanced analytical tools that SurveyLab offers, you can engage in data analysis and discover patterns you might have missed otherwise.
• The platform lets you generate graphical reports that make your findings easy to understand and share. And if you need to dig deeper, you can export the data for further analysis.

But SurveyLab isn’t just about gathering data – it’s about making sense of it.

The combination of scoring, metrics, data collection, and data analysis tools means you can conduct quantitative observations that lead to real, actionable insights.

It’s like having a full toolkit at your disposal, ready to help you make informed decisions based on solid data.

Ready to see how SurveyLab can change your quantitative observation efforts?

Try it today and access the insights that will drive your success.

And for more educational content, check our blog out .

Try SurveyLab for free Best survey tool with great features

14 days trial | view complete list of features

Frequently asked questions

What’s an example of a research objective.

Your research objectives indicate how you’ll try to address your research problem and should be specific:

Frequently asked questions: Writing a research paper

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .

However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:

• Researchability
• Feasibility and specificity
• Relevance and originality

Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them.

In general, they should be:

• Focused and researchable
• Answerable using credible sources
• Complex and arguable
• Feasible and specific
• Relevant and original

All research questions should be:

• Focused on a single problem or issue
• Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources
• Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints
• Specific enough to answer thoroughly
• Complex enough to develop the answer over the space of a paper or thesis
• Relevant to your field of study and/or society more broadly

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.

They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.

Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in Chicago style are to:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Use 1 inch margins or larger
• Apply double line spacing
• Indent every new paragraph ½ inch
• Include a title page
• Place page numbers in the top right or bottom center
• Cite your sources with author-date citations or Chicago footnotes
• Include a bibliography or reference list

To automatically generate accurate Chicago references, you can use Scribbr’s free Chicago reference generator .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in MLA style are as follows:

• Use an easily readable font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Set 1 inch page margins
• Include a four-line MLA heading on the first page
• Center the paper’s title
• Use title case capitalization for headings
• Cite your sources with MLA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a Works Cited page at the end

To format a paper in APA Style , follow these guidelines:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman or 11 pt Arial
• If submitting for publication, insert a running head on every page
• Apply APA heading styles
• Cite your sources with APA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a reference page at the end

No, it’s not appropriate to present new arguments or evidence in the conclusion . While you might be tempted to save a striking argument for last, research papers follow a more formal structure than this.

All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the results and discussion sections if you are following a scientific structure). The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.

The conclusion of a research paper has several key elements you should make sure to include:

• A restatement of the research problem
• A summary of your key arguments and/or findings
• A short discussion of the implications of your research

Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.

This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .

The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .

A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.

The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:

• A hook to catch the reader’s interest
• Relevant background on the topic
• Details of your research problem

and your problem statement

• A thesis statement or research question
• Sometimes an overview of the paper

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem.  We  are always here for you.

• Email [email protected]
• Start live chat
• Call +1 (510) 822-8066
• WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Our team helps students graduate by offering:

• A world-class citation generator
• Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
• Innovative Citation Checker software
• Professional proofreading services
• Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more

Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:

• PhD dissertations
• Research proposals
• Personal statements
• Admission essays
• Motivation letters
• Reflection papers
• Journal articles
• Capstone projects

Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .

The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.

The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.

You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .

Quantitative Research Methods

Research Methods in Psychology

January 2023

This sixteen-hour course provides a comprehensive exploration of the scientific method, beginning with a detailed description of its steps, from posing a hypothesis to analyzing and reporting results. Students will learn to judge the quality of sources for literature reviews, ensuring they can discern credible information. The course covers the various types of research questions scientists pose, highlighting the differences and similarities. It also covers the definition of variables, scales of measurement, and the importance of making reliable observations.

A significant portion of the course is dedicated to comparing and contrasting major research designs such as correlational techniques and experimental methods, along with their strengths and weaknesses, which are assessed in terms of construct validity, internal validity, and external validity. Methods for establishing experimental control are reviewed in detail along with the nature of between- and within-participant designs, and factorial designs.

In another major section of the course, students will gain insights into the historical context of ethical concerns in scientific research, illustrated with specific examples. The course emphasizes the purposes served by research ethics codes and uses the Ethics Code of the American Psychological Association as a foundation for exploring ethical issues related to scientific research. Protections offered by ethics codes for human participants and animals in research are thoroughly examined. The course also addresses the implications of the overrepresentation of WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) participants in psychological research. Students will identify the consequences of different types of research fraud and learn how replication and preregistration can mitigate issues like p-hacking and HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known).

Learning objectives

• Describe the steps of the scientific method.
• Explain how to judge the quality of a source for a literature review.
• Compare and contrast the kinds of research questions scientists ask.
• Specify how variables are defined.
• Explain what it means for an observation to be reliable.
• Compare and contrast the major research designs.
• Compare and contrast forms of validity as they apply to the major research designs.
• Illustrate the history of ethical concerns about scientific research using specific examples.
• Describe purposes served by codes of research ethics.
• Explain the five general Ethical Principles of the APA Ethics Code.
• Describe the issues addressed by the APA Ethical Standards that apply to researchers.
• Explain how IRBs and IACUCs operate.
• Outline the major ethical considerations in planning a research study using nonhuman animals.
• Explain the importance of the three Rs in animal research.
• Explain the protections ethics codes offer for human participants in research.
• Describe the implications of WEIRD participants being overrepresented in psychological research.
• Identify the consequences of the different types of fraud in research.
• Explain how replication and preregistration address the problems of p-hacking and HARKing.
• Apply your knowledge of ethical violations and propose solutions for real-life research.

This program does not offer CE credit.

More in this series

Basic qualitative methods like narrative inquiry and ethnography are introduced

January 2023 On Demand Training

A concepts-focused introduction to basic descriptive and inferential statistics

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• Quantitative Methods
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

Quantitative methods emphasize objective measurements and the statistical, mathematical, or numerical analysis of data collected through polls, questionnaires, and surveys, or by manipulating pre-existing statistical data using computational techniques . Quantitative research focuses on gathering numerical data and generalizing it across groups of people or to explain a particular phenomenon.

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research . 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Muijs, Daniel. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS . 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications, 2010.

Need Help Locating Statistics?

Resources for locating data and statistics can be found here:

Statistics & Data Research Guide

Characteristics of Quantitative Research

Your goal in conducting quantitative research study is to determine the relationship between one thing [an independent variable] and another [a dependent or outcome variable] within a population. Quantitative research designs are either descriptive [subjects usually measured once] or experimental [subjects measured before and after a treatment]. A descriptive study establishes only associations between variables; an experimental study establishes causality.

Quantitative research deals in numbers, logic, and an objective stance. Quantitative research focuses on numeric and unchanging data and detailed, convergent reasoning rather than divergent reasoning [i.e., the generation of a variety of ideas about a research problem in a spontaneous, free-flowing manner].

Its main characteristics are :

• The data is usually gathered using structured research instruments.
• The results are based on larger sample sizes that are representative of the population.
• The research study can usually be replicated or repeated, given its high reliability.
• Researcher has a clearly defined research question to which objective answers are sought.
• All aspects of the study are carefully designed before data is collected.
• Data are in the form of numbers and statistics, often arranged in tables, charts, figures, or other non-textual forms.
• Project can be used to generalize concepts more widely, predict future results, or investigate causal relationships.
• Researcher uses tools, such as questionnaires or computer software, to collect numerical data.

The overarching aim of a quantitative research study is to classify features, count them, and construct statistical models in an attempt to explain what is observed.

  Things to keep in mind when reporting the results of a study using quantitative methods :

• Explain the data collected and their statistical treatment as well as all relevant results in relation to the research problem you are investigating. Interpretation of results is not appropriate in this section.
• Report unanticipated events that occurred during your data collection. Explain how the actual analysis differs from the planned analysis. Explain your handling of missing data and why any missing data does not undermine the validity of your analysis.
• Explain the techniques you used to "clean" your data set.
• Choose a minimally sufficient statistical procedure ; provide a rationale for its use and a reference for it. Specify any computer programs used.
• Describe the assumptions for each procedure and the steps you took to ensure that they were not violated.
• When using inferential statistics , provide the descriptive statistics, confidence intervals, and sample sizes for each variable as well as the value of the test statistic, its direction, the degrees of freedom, and the significance level [report the actual p value].
• Avoid inferring causality , particularly in nonrandomized designs or without further experimentation.
• Use tables to provide exact values ; use figures to convey global effects. Keep figures small in size; include graphic representations of confidence intervals whenever possible.
• Always tell the reader what to look for in tables and figures .

NOTE:   When using pre-existing statistical data gathered and made available by anyone other than yourself [e.g., government agency], you still must report on the methods that were used to gather the data and describe any missing data that exists and, if there is any, provide a clear explanation why the missing data does not undermine the validity of your final analysis.

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research . 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Brians, Craig Leonard et al. Empirical Political Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods . 8th ed. Boston, MA: Longman, 2011; McNabb, David E. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches . 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2008; Quantitative Research Methods. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2007.

Basic Research Design for Quantitative Studies

Before designing a quantitative research study, you must decide whether it will be descriptive or experimental because this will dictate how you gather, analyze, and interpret the results. A descriptive study is governed by the following rules: subjects are generally measured once; the intention is to only establish associations between variables; and, the study may include a sample population of hundreds or thousands of subjects to ensure that a valid estimate of a generalized relationship between variables has been obtained. An experimental design includes subjects measured before and after a particular treatment, the sample population may be very small and purposefully chosen, and it is intended to establish causality between variables. Introduction The introduction to a quantitative study is usually written in the present tense and from the third person point of view. It covers the following information:

• Identifies the research problem -- as with any academic study, you must state clearly and concisely the research problem being investigated.
• Reviews the literature -- review scholarship on the topic, synthesizing key themes and, if necessary, noting studies that have used similar methods of inquiry and analysis. Note where key gaps exist and how your study helps to fill these gaps or clarifies existing knowledge.
• Describes the theoretical framework -- provide an outline of the theory or hypothesis underpinning your study. If necessary, define unfamiliar or complex terms, concepts, or ideas and provide the appropriate background information to place the research problem in proper context [e.g., historical, cultural, economic, etc.].

Methodology The methods section of a quantitative study should describe how each objective of your study will be achieved. Be sure to provide enough detail to enable the reader can make an informed assessment of the methods being used to obtain results associated with the research problem. The methods section should be presented in the past tense.

• Study population and sampling -- where did the data come from; how robust is it; note where gaps exist or what was excluded. Note the procedures used for their selection;
• Data collection – describe the tools and methods used to collect information and identify the variables being measured; describe the methods used to obtain the data; and, note if the data was pre-existing [i.e., government data] or you gathered it yourself. If you gathered it yourself, describe what type of instrument you used and why. Note that no data set is perfect--describe any limitations in methods of gathering data.
• Data analysis -- describe the procedures for processing and analyzing the data. If appropriate, describe the specific instruments of analysis used to study each research objective, including mathematical techniques and the type of computer software used to manipulate the data.

Results The finding of your study should be written objectively and in a succinct and precise format. In quantitative studies, it is common to use graphs, tables, charts, and other non-textual elements to help the reader understand the data. Make sure that non-textual elements do not stand in isolation from the text but are being used to supplement the overall description of the results and to help clarify key points being made. Further information about how to effectively present data using charts and graphs can be found here .

• Statistical analysis -- how did you analyze the data? What were the key findings from the data? The findings should be present in a logical, sequential order. Describe but do not interpret these trends or negative results; save that for the discussion section. The results should be presented in the past tense.

Discussion Discussions should be analytic, logical, and comprehensive. The discussion should meld together your findings in relation to those identified in the literature review, and placed within the context of the theoretical framework underpinning the study. The discussion should be presented in the present tense.

• Interpretation of results -- reiterate the research problem being investigated and compare and contrast the findings with the research questions underlying the study. Did they affirm predicted outcomes or did the data refute it?
• Description of trends, comparison of groups, or relationships among variables -- describe any trends that emerged from your analysis and explain all unanticipated and statistical insignificant findings.
• Discussion of implications – what is the meaning of your results? Highlight key findings based on the overall results and note findings that you believe are important. How have the results helped fill gaps in understanding the research problem?
• Limitations -- describe any limitations or unavoidable bias in your study and, if necessary, note why these limitations did not inhibit effective interpretation of the results.

Conclusion End your study by to summarizing the topic and provide a final comment and assessment of the study.

• Summary of findings – synthesize the answers to your research questions. Do not report any statistical data here; just provide a narrative summary of the key findings and describe what was learned that you did not know before conducting the study.
• Recommendations – if appropriate to the aim of the assignment, tie key findings with policy recommendations or actions to be taken in practice.
• Future research – note the need for future research linked to your study’s limitations or to any remaining gaps in the literature that were not addressed in your study.

Black, Thomas R. Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences: An Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics . London: Sage, 1999; Gay,L. R. and Peter Airasain. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications . 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall, 2003; Hector, Anestine. An Overview of Quantitative Research in Composition and TESOL . Department of English, Indiana University of Pennsylvania; Hopkins, Will G. “Quantitative Research Design.” Sportscience 4, 1 (2000); "A Strategy for Writing Up Research Results. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper." Department of Biology. Bates College; Nenty, H. Johnson. "Writing a Quantitative Research Thesis." International Journal of Educational Science 1 (2009): 19-32; Ouyang, Ronghua (John). Basic Inquiry of Quantitative Research . Kennesaw State University.

Strengths of Using Quantitative Methods

Quantitative researchers try to recognize and isolate specific variables contained within the study framework, seek correlation, relationships and causality, and attempt to control the environment in which the data is collected to avoid the risk of variables, other than the one being studied, accounting for the relationships identified.

Among the specific strengths of using quantitative methods to study social science research problems:

• Allows for a broader study, involving a greater number of subjects, and enhancing the generalization of the results;
• Allows for greater objectivity and accuracy of results. Generally, quantitative methods are designed to provide summaries of data that support generalizations about the phenomenon under study. In order to accomplish this, quantitative research usually involves few variables and many cases, and employs prescribed procedures to ensure validity and reliability;
• Applying well established standards means that the research can be replicated, and then analyzed and compared with similar studies;
• You can summarize vast sources of information and make comparisons across categories and over time; and,
• Personal bias can be avoided by keeping a 'distance' from participating subjects and using accepted computational techniques .

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research . 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Brians, Craig Leonard et al. Empirical Political Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods . 8th ed. Boston, MA: Longman, 2011; McNabb, David E. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches . 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2008; Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2007.

Limitations of Using Quantitative Methods

Quantitative methods presume to have an objective approach to studying research problems, where data is controlled and measured, to address the accumulation of facts, and to determine the causes of behavior. As a consequence, the results of quantitative research may be statistically significant but are often humanly insignificant.

Some specific limitations associated with using quantitative methods to study research problems in the social sciences include:

• Quantitative data is more efficient and able to test hypotheses, but may miss contextual detail;
• Uses a static and rigid approach and so employs an inflexible process of discovery;
• The development of standard questions by researchers can lead to "structural bias" and false representation, where the data actually reflects the view of the researcher instead of the participating subject;
• Results provide less detail on behavior, attitudes, and motivation;
• Researcher may collect a much narrower and sometimes superficial dataset;
• Results are limited as they provide numerical descriptions rather than detailed narrative and generally provide less elaborate accounts of human perception;
• The research is often carried out in an unnatural, artificial environment so that a level of control can be applied to the exercise. This level of control might not normally be in place in the real world thus yielding "laboratory results" as opposed to "real world results"; and,
• Preset answers will not necessarily reflect how people really feel about a subject and, in some cases, might just be the closest match to the preconceived hypothesis.

Research Tip

Finding Examples of How to Apply Different Types of Research Methods

SAGE publications is a major publisher of studies about how to design and conduct research in the social and behavioral sciences. Their SAGE Research Methods Online and Cases database includes contents from books, articles, encyclopedias, handbooks, and videos covering social science research design and methods including the complete Little Green Book Series of Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences and the Little Blue Book Series of Qualitative Research techniques. The database also includes case studies outlining the research methods used in real research projects. This is an excellent source for finding definitions of key terms and descriptions of research design and practice, techniques of data gathering, analysis, and reporting, and information about theories of research [e.g., grounded theory]. The database covers both qualitative and quantitative research methods as well as mixed methods approaches to conducting research.

SAGE Research Methods Online and Cases

• << Previous: Qualitative Methods
• Next: Insiderness >>
• Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 9:40 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Digital and quantitative PCR research approaches to study Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a rare muscular disorder

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a rare disease (1) affecting about 1 in 5,000 boys worldwide, is a severe X-linked recessive condition caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. A large number of variable mutations, including deletions, duplications, or small mutations, have been identified in the Dmd coding sequence and splice sites. This variability, high mutation rate, and the large size of the gene make it challenging to develop effective gene therapies targeting DMD (2,3).

Patients with DMD have a progressive disease that causes muscle wasting, respiratory insufficiency, and cardiomyopathy, starting from early childhood. They usually lose the ability to walk on their own around 12 years old, and death may occur in the late twenties, usually from cardiorespiratory failure (2,3).

Current research into therapeutic strategies for DMD either aim to restore dystrophin protein function or target downstream effects of dystrophin deficiency, like muscle mass loss, inflammation, and fibrosis. Strategies to restore protein function include gene therapy and manipulation of cellular machinery for transcription, mRNA processing, and translation. These strategies are in various stages of pre-clinical and clinical research, with some focusing on CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing or systemic delivery of functional dystrophin using viral vectors like adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) (2,3). In 2023, AAV-based delandistrogene moxeparvovec-rokl (Elevidys ® ) was brought to market as the first gene therapy for DMD. This therapy introduces a gene that produces a shortened version of the normal dystrophin protein, which is expected to improve muscle function (4).

In this article, we discuss various genetic analysis tools used in DMD research, using recent examples from the literature.  

Evaluating the efficacy of exon-skipping approaches for DMD using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR)

Research into exon-skipping approaches for mediating DMD have not shown significant benefit due to inconsistent dystrophin protein restoration. In a study aimed at understanding the turnover dynamics of dystrophin and its related proteins, researchers measured protein stability and turnover in the DMD mouse models ( mdx ) after treatment using a mass spectrometry approach. Findings indicate that treated mdx muscle shows slower dystrophin turnover and extended protein half-life, suggesting that these therapies stabilize the protein differently than in normal muscle (5).

Quantitative real-time PCR using Applied Biosystems ™ TaqMan ™ assays and TaqMan ™ Universal PCR MasterMix on an Applied Biosystems ™ QuantStudio ™ 7 Real-Time PCR cycler, and digital PCR using the Applied Biosystems ™ QuantStudio ™ 3D Digital-PCR System were used to evaluate the efficacy of the exon-skipping approaches (5).

• qPCR measured the levels of exon-skipped Dmd transcript relative to the total Dmd It provided a percentage of skipped mRNA at various time points post-treatment in different muscle tissues.
• dPCR was used for absolute quantification of skipped Dmd transcript levels within the tissue. This method allowed for the determination of the stability of the skipped Dmd transcript over time, confirming the sudden decline in skipped mRNA levels observed with qRT-PCR.

Figure 1: A simple research workflow for absolute transcript quantification. The QuantStudio Absolute Q Digital PCR System is an all-in-one instrument that integrates all dPCR steps in a single instrument. Pipette the reaction mixture into the MAP plate, just like in real-time PCR, and let the platform take care of the rest.

The measurement of relative and absolute quantities of exon-skipped Dmd transcripts and the correlation of the presence of skipped transcripts with the expression and localization of dystrophin protein in muscle tissue was critical in assessing the therapy’s longitudinal efficacy (5).

Research into verifying differentiation of genome-edited DMD patient-derived stem cells using qPCR

Utrophin, a dystrophin-like protein deficient in DMD research patients, can functionally compensate for the absence of dystrophin when expressed at increased levels in the muscle fibers. Therefore, strategies to upregulate utrophin are considered promising approaches (6).

In a research study using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to upregulate utrophin in DMD patient-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells (DMD-hiPSCs), miRNA binding sites in the utrophin gene’s 3′ UTR were deleted to alleviate miRNA repression and thereby, increase utrophin expression. This approach represents a promising avenue for possible future DMD treatments (6).

To verify the differentiation of wild-type, DMD, and genome-edited hiPSC clones into the myogenic lineage, qPCR was performed using the PowerTrack SYBR Green PCR master mix and QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System. The expression levels of myogenic markers ( MyoD1, Myogenin , and endogenous MyoD1 ) and the pluripotency marker Nanog were measured. The increase in myogenic markers and decrease in the pluripotency marker post-tamoxifen induction confirmed the differentiation process (6).

Digital PCR assessment of gene editing efficiency in the dystrophin gene

A study investigating the long-term effectiveness of a gene editing approach for DMD (deletion of exons 52 and 53 in the dystrophin gene) in mdx mice found that low levels of dystrophin persisted in cardiomyocytes but not in skeletal muscles, where cells continued to be prone to damage and regeneration. Increasing the ratio of guide RNA to nuclease vectors improved gene-editing efficiency in both muscle types, although achieving high dystrophin levels in skeletal muscles remained challenging. The study suggests that improving gene editing efficiency is required for stable dystrophin expression (7).

dPCR using the QuantStudio 3D Digital-PCR System quantified the percentage of genomes that had undergone successful deletion of dystrophin exons 52-53 in various tissues, including the heart, diaphragm, and gastrocnemius muscles. In addition, the percentage of dystrophin transcripts lacking exons 52-53 was also quantified using dPCR, providing insights into the efficiency of gene editing at the mRNA level (7).

See how you can use the Absolute Q Digital PCR System in your research. Learn more .

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

© 2024 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries unless otherwise specified.  TaqMan is a trademark of Roche Diagnostics, Inc.

References:

• Crisafulli S, Sultana J, Fontana A, Salvo F, Messina S, Trifirò G. Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Jun 5;15(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01430-8. PMID: 32503598; PMCID: PMC7275323.
• Bez Batti Angulski A, Hosny N, Cohen H, Martin AA, Hahn D, Bauer J, Metzger JM. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: disease mechanism and therapeutic strategies. Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1183101. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1183101. PMID: 37435300; PMCID: PMC10330733.
• Fortunato F, Farnè M, Ferlini A. The DMD gene and therapeutic approaches to restore dystrophin. Neuromuscul Disord. 2021 Oct;31(10):1013-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2021.08.004. PMID: 34736624.
• Press release: FDA Approves First Gene Therapy for Treatment of Certain Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy | FDA
• Novak JS, Spathis R, Dang UJ, Fiorillo AA, Hindupur R, Tully CB, Mázala DAG, Canessa E, Brown KJ, Partridge TA, Hathout Y, Nagaraju K. Interrogation of Dystrophin and Dystroglycan Complex Protein Turnover After Exon Skipping Therapy. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2021;8(s2):S383-S402. doi: 10.3233/JND-210696. PMID: 34569969; PMCID: PMC8673539.
• Sengupta K, Mishra MK, Loro E, Spencer MJ, Pyle AD, Khurana TS. Genome Editing-Mediated Utrophin Upregulation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Stem Cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020 Aug 29;22:500-509. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.08.031. PMID: 33230452; PMCID: PMC7554652
• Bengtsson NE, Tasfaout H, Hauschka SD, Chamberlain JS. Dystrophin Gene-Editing Stability Is Dependent on Dystrophin Levels in Skeletal but Not Cardiac Muscles. Mol Ther. 2021 Mar 3;29(3):1070-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 5. PMID: 33160075; PMCID: PMC7934576.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get news and research reviews on the topic of your choice, right in your inbox.

Subscribe Now

• Select your country/region * Select your country/region United States Canada Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland Fmr Yugoslav Rep of Macedonia France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic Of) Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Rep Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Rep Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sth Georgia & Sth Sandwich Is St Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay US Minor Outlying Islands Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zambia Zimbabwe
• Pick a category * Pick a category Accelerating Microscopy Advancing Materials Advancing Mining Analyzing Metals Behind the Bench Examining Food Identifying Threats Life in the Lab
• I would like to receive information about content, events, products, services and promotions from Thermo Fisher Scientific and its affiliates. I agree for the Thermo Fisher Scientific group (thermofisher.com/legalentities) to contact me by email and/or telephone to inform me of events, products, services and/or promotions offered in connection with the brands Thermo Scientific™, Applied Biosystems™, Invitrogen™, Gibco™, Ion Torrent ™, Unity Lab Services™, Fisher Scientifc™. I can withdraw my consent and unsubscribe at any time by emailing [email protected] By submitting my data, I give consent to the collection, processing and use of my personal data in accordance with the Thermo Fisher Scientific Policy (thermofisher.com/privacypolicy).
• Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

• Previous Article
• Next Article

Insights on feline infectious peritonitis risk factors and sampling strategies from polymerase chain reaction analysis of feline coronavirus in large-scale nationwide submissions

• Download PDF

This nationwide study aimed to investigate risk factors associated with FIP and determine optimal sample submission strategies for its diagnosis.

A total of 14,035 clinical samples from cats across the US were analyzed by means of reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR to detect replicating feline coronavirus (FCoV). χ 2 and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between FCoV detection rates and risk factors such as age, gender, breed, and types of submitted samples.

Higher FCoV detection rates were observed in younger cats, particularly those aged 0 to 1 year, and in male cats. Purebred cats, notably British Shorthairs [OR: 2.81; P < .001], showed a higher incidence of FCoV infection than other cats. Peritoneal fluid (OR, 7.51; P < .001) exhibited higher FCoV detection rates than other samples, while lower rates were seen in blood samples (OR, 0.08; P < .001) than in other samples. High FCoV detection rates were found in urine, kidney , and lymph node samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified significant risk factors associated with FIP. Optimal sample submission strategies, particularly emphasizing the use of peritoneal fluid, kidney , and lymph node, were identified to improve FIP detection rates. Urine yielded a relatively high frequency of infection and viral loads compared with most other samples.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the risk factors and optimizing sample selection for FIP diagnosis can aid in the early detection and management of the disease, ultimately improving outcomes for affected cats. These findings contribute valuable insights to FIP epidemiology and underscore the importance of continued research to enhance diagnostic strategies and disease management approaches.

Introduction

Feline infectious peritonitis is a fatal and progressive illness caused by feline coronavirus (FCoV), affecting domestic and wild felids globally. 3 Feline coronavirus manifests in 2 forms: the low-virulence feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) and the high-virulence FIP virus (FIPV). 1 Feline infectious peritonitis can be exhibited in 2 forms: the “wet” form, characterized by fluid accumulation in body cavities, and the “dry” form, which involves granulomatous lesions in various organs. 2 Despite being extensively studied, FIP remains without a definitive diagnostic test, an approved efficacious treatment, or a dependable vaccine. It is widely believed that FIPV arises from the accumulation of mutations in FECV, which are favored by high frequencies of FCoV replication and transmission, particularly in multicat environments. 3 , 4 This enigmatic pathogenesis of FIP creates substantial diagnostic difficulties in distinguishing FIPV infections from common mild FECV ones.

Studies 5 , 6 investigating the epidemiology of FIP in cats have identified risk factors for the development of FIP such as age, breed, sex, seasons, coinfection, and multicat environments. All these identified risk factors play a crucial role in guiding diagnostic strategies, therapy, and disease control strategies.

Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for improving the quality of life for those infected with FIPV. However, definitively diagnosing FIP can be extremely challenging, especially antemortem, due to the limitations of available diagnostic tests and the overlapping clinical signs with other feline diseases. The choice of the samples may vary depending on the clinical access, the preferences of the veterinarian, and the clinical presentation of the cat. 7

In cases where FIP is suspected, a combination of tests and appropriate samples may be necessary to obtain an accurate diagnosis. Polymerase chain reaction testing for FCoV RNA has become one of the most reliable and rapid diagnostic indicators for FIP in suspected cases. 8 , 9 However, it has been argued that the detection of FCoV genomic RNA using PCRs may not always indicate a definite diagnosis of FIP, as FCoV viremia has been observed in clinically healthy cats. 10 This argument is grounded in the understanding that FIPV replicates mainly within monocytes/macrophages, unlike the less virulent FECV counterpart. The diagnostic usefulness of PCR was evaluated in different types of samples 11 ; however, the reliability of this test for FIP diagnosis depends largely on the choice of test specimens.

Among the key questions asked about FIP by clinicians, the 2 most important ones concern the risk factors and optimal choice of tissue or fluid samples for viral detection. While most studies addressing these 2 essential questions have been conducted with small sample sizes, 10 , 12 – 14 our work comprehensively analyzed the viral presence of FCoV in 14,035 submissions from across the US. The statistical analysis of this extensive data set confirmed some previous findings and also shed novel light on FIP risk factors. The results also suggested an optimal choice of samples for diagnostic testing.

Clinical sample collection

Convenience samples (n = 14,035) submitted to the Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory at the Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine from 2016 to 2023, originating from 47 US states, were utilized in this study. These samples had been submitted for molecular diagnosis due to clinical signs and tests suggestive of FIP. Information such as age, breed, and types of submitted feline samples was recorded.

Extraction of nucleic acids

Total nucleic acid extraction from the submitted samples was performed with glass fiber matrix binding and elution with a commercial kit (High-Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit; Roche Diagnostic) following the manufacturer’s instructions and described previously. 15 For each specimen, 400 μL of fluid or biopsy tissue in saline was mixed with an equal volume of binding buffer and eluted in a final volume of 100 μL.

Reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR

The FCoV MN gene PCR utilized in this study followed the original approach reported by Simons et al 16 with minor modifications. The reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was designed to quantify the replicating FCoV and amplify a 281-bp FCoV genomic region that spans the junction of M and N genes, as described. 10

The assay was performed with 25-ng standardized cDNA input as a 1-step RT-qPCR modeled on the proprietary Auburn University Molecular Diagnostics PCR thermal design (US patent 7,252,937). The sensitivity of this assay was validated by serial dilution of cDNA standard templates. The limit of detection was a single mRNA copy per reaction as evident in the Poisson distribution of positive and negative amplification reactions at the limiting dilution. Validation of the specificity was performed by sequence determination of positive amplifications in this study.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer RT-qPCR was performed on a Roche light cycler 480 II system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) containing 2.0-U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) and 0.0213-U ThermoScript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Thermal cycling was preceded by a 10-minute reverse transcription reaction at 55 °C followed by a 4-minute denaturation at 95 °C and 30 fluorescence acquisition cycles of 10 seconds at 95 °C, 8 seconds at 58 °C with fluorescence acquisition, 30 seconds at 67 °C, and 30 seconds at 72°C with the melting curve determined by 1 minute at 95 °C and 2 minutes at 42 °C and increasing to 74 °C with continuous fluorescence reading. The reference FIPV as a quantitative standard used in this study was FIPV strain 79-1146 (American Type Culture Collection).

Analysis of multiple types of submitted samples from individual cats

Among 14,035 submissions included in this study, multiple types of samples were submitted from 389 individual cats. These samples encompassed a variety of sources, with whole blood (n = 330), peritoneal fluid (286), lymph node (63), feces (50), kidney (19), spleen (14), pleural fluid (8), liver (8), colon (7), CSF (4), aqueous humor (3), lung (3), omentum (2), intestine (1), bone marrow (1), and testicle (1) being among them. This study specifically compared the FCoV positivity among multiple submissions when they originated from the same cats.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed with STATISTICA 7.1 software (Statsoft). Summary statistics describing the overall FCoV detection rates associated with different risk factors (sex, age, and types of samples) were performed. The data were presented as mean and ± SD or CI. χ 2 tests were employed for preliminary univariate analyses to ascertain the significance of the relationships between sex, age groups, neutered status, various types of samples, breeds, and the presence of FCoV. The univariate logistic regression model used age, gender, breed, and kinds of submitted samples as independent and categorical variables (age, gender, breed, and types of samples) to assess the risk factor and existence of FCoV. Odds ratios with 95% CI were calculated to quantify the strength of the associations between the risk factors and FCoV detection. Out of the 74 distinct breeds, we specifically focused on 24 breeds that had a sample size of 30 or greater to calculate the odds ratio. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Demographic information of the cats and the submitted samples

The average age of the cats from which the samples were submitted in this study was 3.51 years, ranging from 1 month to 17 years old (SD, 3.88 years; Supplementary Table S1 ).

In total, the submitted samples represented 77 different feline breeds, including domestic shorthair (n = 7,891), followed by domestic longhair (729), domestic mediumhair (529), Siamese (348), Maine Coon (291), Ragdoll (275), Persian (189), Bengal (160), Siberian (155), Sphynx (147), British Shorthair (143), Scottish Fold (113), and unknown mixed breeds (172). These samples, as well as other samples with < 100 submissions, are listed in Supplementary Table S2 .

The main types of submitted samples included peritoneal fluid (n = 7,720), whole blood (4,496), lymph node (360), pleural fluid (197), urine (145), kidney (124), intestine (98), spleen (92), liver (83), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (73), aqueous humor (40), lung (22), and bone marrow (12; Table 1 ). Other samples with < 10 submissions included the brain, eye, omentum, colon, testicle, and skin.

Positivity of feline coronavirus detection in different types of submitted samples.

*The viral copy number in the feline coronavirus–positive samples.

Higher detection rate of FCoV in young cats than in old ones

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR detected replicating FCoV in 39.1% of submitted samples (5,491 of 14,035) in this study. Overall, significantly higher detection rates of FCoV were observed in younger cats compared to older ones, with detection rates of FCoV declining as cats aged ( Figure 1 ; Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Table S3 ). Cats aged 2 to 10 years exhibited a significantly lower FCoV detection rate (1,762 of 5,167 [34.1%]) than cats aged 0 to 1 year (3,250 of 6,979 [46.6%]; P < .001) and a rate significantly higher than the cats above 10 years old (268 of 1,238 [21.6%] P < .001). Cats aged 0 to 1 year have a 2-fold higher possibility of being FCoV positive than cats ≥ 2 years old.

Detection rates of feline coronavirus (FCoV) in cats across various age groups. A—The detection rates of FCoV declined as cats aged. Logistic regression analysis was employed to analyze the FCoV detection rates among cats of different age groups. It was defined that 1 year means ages 0 to 1 year, 2 years mean 1.1 to 2 years old, and so forth. The P values from logistic regression analysis can be found in Supplementary Table S3 . B—Cats aged 2 to 10 years exhibited a significantly lower FCoV detection rate (1,762 of 5,167 samples [34.1%]) than cats aged 0 to 1 year (3,250 of 6,979 samples [46.6%]) and a rate significantly higher than the cats above 10 years old (268 of 1,238 samples [21.6%]; P < .001; χ 2 test). Error bar, mean ± 95% CI.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2024; 10.2460/javma.24.03.0208

• Download Figure
• Download figure as PowerPoint slide

Higher FCoV detection rates in male than female cats

The detection rate of FCoV in male cats was 42.4% (3,536 of 8,324), statistically significantly higher than the 34.3% in female cats (1,799 of 5,242; P < .001; Figure 2 ). The FCoV detection rate was statistically significantly higher in male cats than in female ones. However, no statistically significant association was observed between castrated and intact male cats (2,645 of 6,361 [41.6%] vs 138 of 328 [42.0%]) and between spayed female and intact cats (1,308 of 3,887 [33.7%] vs 48 of 129 [37.2%]). While male cats showed an overall higher detection rate of FCoV than female cats across different ages in this study, the difference was significant specifically for cats under 4 years of age ( Figure 3 ) .

Comparison of the detection rates of FCoV in male and female cats. The detection rate of FCoV in male cats was 42.4% (3,536 of 8,324 cats), significantly higher than the 34.3% in female cats (1,799 of 5,242 cats; A). However, no significant difference was observed between intact male and castrated cats (138 of 328 vs 2,645 of 6,361 cats) and intact female cats and spayed cats (48 of 129 vs 1,308 of 3,887 cats; C). Error bar, mean ± 95% CI.

Detection rates of FCoV in male and female cats across various age groups. While the male cats showed an overall higher detection rate of FCoV than female cats across different ages in this study, the difference was significant specifically for cats under 4 years of age. Error bar, mean ± 95% CI.

Lower detection rates of FCoV in mixed-breed cats compared to the purebred cats

Among the 77 feline breeds included in this study, 25 breeds with more than 30 submissions were analyzed by means of logistic regression analysis. The statistical analysis demonstrated that British Shorthair cats (purebred) demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of FCoV (positivity rate, 64.3%; OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.99 to 3.96; P < .001) than other cats. Domestic shorthair cats (mixed breed) had a significantly lower FCoV detection rate (positivity rate, 37.7%; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.88; P < .001) than other cats ( Figure 4 ; Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Table S4 ).

Differences in FCoV detection rates among different cat breeds. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare the detection rates of FCoV across 25 feline breeds with more than 30 submissions in this study. Particularly, a significant lower FCoV detection rate was found in domestic shorthairs (OR, 0.81). In a comparison, a significantly higher detection rate of FCoV was found in British Shorthairs (OR, 2.81), Birmans (OR, 2.13), Siberians (OR, 2.10), Persians (OR, 1.53), and Ragdolls (OR, 1.29). The p values and OR from logistic regression analysis can be found in Supplementary Table S4 . Error bar, mean ± 95% CI.

Significantly higher FCoV in peritoneal fluids and tissues than in whole blood

We employed logistic regression analysis to analyze the FCoV detection rates across 14 distinct sample types, each with over 10 submissions ( Figure 5 ; Table 1 ; Supplementary Table S5 ). The highest detection rates were observed in peritoneal fluid samples (4,431 of 7,720 [57.4%]) and urine samples (76 of 145 [52.4%]), significantly higher than in samples of whole blood (400 of 4,496 [8.9%]), CSF (7 of 73 [9.6%]), lung (3 of 22 [13.6%]), spleen (15 of 92 [16.3%]), liver (14 of 83 [16.9%]), aqueous humor (7 of 40 [17.5%]), feces (43 of 140 [30.7%]), kidney (48 of 124 [38.7%]), pleural fluid (78 of 197 [39.6%]), lymph node (162 of 360 [45.0%]) and bone marrow (0 of 12 [0%]). Additionally, the detection rate in whole blood (positivity, 8.9%; OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.09; P < .001) was significantly lower than in most tissue samples, while kidney and lymph nodes exhibited higher detection rates compared to other tissue samples.

Comparison of FCoV positivity and viral burdens in different types of samples. A—Logistic regression analysis was utilized to compare the detection rates of FCoV across 14 types of submitted samples with more than 30 submissions in this study. The significantly higher detection rates were observed in peritoneal fluid (OR, 7.51), urine (OR, 1.72), and lymph node (OR, 1.28). In comparison, a significantly lower detection rate was observed in blood (OR, 0.09), CSF (OR, 0.16), lung (OR, 0.24), spleen (OR, 0.30), liver (OR, 0.31), aqueous humor (OR, 0.33), and feces (OR, 0.69). The P values and OR from logistic regression analysis can be found in Supplementary Table S5 . B—Error bar, mean ± 95% CI.

The comparison of the viral copies among the FCoV-positive samples showed that the viral burden in whole blood (10 1.63 ) was significantly lower than in urine (10 3.19 ), peritoneal fluid (10 2.97 ), kidney (10 2.95 ), CSF (10 2.83 ), feces (10 2.78 ), pleural fluid (10 2.70 ), lymph node (10 2.54 ), intestine (10 2.46 ), and bone marrow (0; Table 1 ). In addition, the viral copy numbers in urine (10 3.19 ) and peritoneal fluid (10 2.97 ) were significantly higher than in lymph node (10 2.54 ; Figure 5 ).

Analysis of FCoV in multiple sample submissions from the same cats

Among 389 cats with multiple sample submissions, the FCoV positivity (77 of 331 [23%]; P < .01) was significantly lower than those of any other types of samples (body fluids, 93%; aqueous humor, 2 of 2; tissues, 131 of 155 [85%]; feces, 34 of 50 [68%]). In addition, the FCoV positivity was the highest among all types of submitted samples, and tissue had a significant higher FCoV positivity than in feces ( P < .01). Among the multiple samples, both whole blood and peritoneal fluids were submitted from 234 cats. The blood samples positive for FCoV had an average copy number of 10 2.93 (SD, 10 2.91 ) per sample, significantly lower than the 10 5.39 (SD, 10 6.31 ) in the peritoneal fluids ( P = .02).

Further analysis of these 234 cats demonstrated a negative correlation between FCoV detection rates in feces and other organs and tissues. Interestingly, out of 47 cats that were positive in blood and peritoneal fluids, all 3 submitted fecal submissions were found to be FCoV negative. Furthermore, out of 7 cats that were negative in both blood and peritoneal fluids, all 3 submitted fecal samples were found to be FCoV positive. Among the total 50 of fecal samples in multiple submissions, 34 were found to be FCoV positive. For these 34 cats that had FCoV-positive feces, 23.4% of other submitted samples were found to be positive for FCoV, including 3 of 31 in the whole blood, 7 of 11 in peritoneal fluid, 1 of 3 in the lymph node, 0 of 1 in the kidney, and 0 of 1 in the lymph node. On the other hand, for the 16 cats that had negative fecal tests for FCoV, 69.0% of other submitted samples were FCoV positive (6 of 15 in blood, 9 of 9 in peritoneal fluid, 1 of 1 in CSF, and 4 of 4 in lymph node).

The data from this nationwide study, comprising 14,035 clinical sample submissions for FIP diagnosis, reaffirmed the findings of previous studies and shed novel insights into associated risk factors and optimal choice of sample selection for diagnosis.

In our investigation, we found that cats aged 0 to 1 year exhibited a greater likelihood of testing positive for FCoV compared to cats aged ≥ 2 years, aligning with previous studies. 17 This suggests that young cats may contact FCoV before their immune systems reach full maturity, facilitating efficient virus replication and favoring mutations from FECV to FIPV. 3 , 12 , 13 , 18 Young cats may also experience greater stress due to factors such as relocation, vaccination, neutering, and separation from parent cats. 6 , 14 These stressors could render young cats more susceptible to FIPV compared to their adult counterparts. Stress has been implicated in the increased risk of FCoV shedding and subsequent FIP development. 1 , 17 Stress triggers the release of glucocorticoids, which likely suppress cell-mediated immunity and facilitate increased FCoV replication. 1 , 19

Interestingly, our study also detected a significantly higher positivity of FCoV in male cats compared to females, mirroring trends similarly observed in COVID-19 cases in male and female individuals. 20 Research into FCoV and gender predisposition suggests that males may be at a higher risk of developing more severe manifestations of FIP. 12 , 21 – 24 However, other reports have stated that males and females have similar risks of developing FIP. 25 Sex-based differences may be related to sex hormones, particularly androgens, which could negatively impact the immune system, potentially increasing the risk of virus replication and mutation. 26 This gender predisposition aligns with findings from other infections affecting cats such as FIV 27 and FeLV, 28 indicating a potential behavioral, hormonal, or physiological basis for the differences in susceptibility and severity between male and female cats. Results of this study suggested that male cats may be at a higher risk of developing FIP than female ones, likely due to the differences in sex hormone and the derived immune responses.

Although we reported gender bias for FCoV detection in the present study, we observed no statistically significant difference in FCoV detection rates between intact cats and those that had been castrated/spayed. Gender, specifically intact males, has been identified as a risk factor for FIP in previous studies. 18 , 24 , 29 Contrary to expectation, certain earlier studies failed to observe any form of gender bias for FIP. 14 , 30 Discrepancies may arise from various factors, including differences in sample sizes and different populations.

In this study, an increased FCoV detection rate has been observed in certain purebred varieties, particularly the British Shorthair, which demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of FCoV than other cats. Pesteanu-Somogyi et al 18 reported the increased risk of developing FIP in certain breeds, notably the Birman, Ragdoll, Bengal, Rex, Abyssinian, and Himalayan breeds. Reduced genetic diversity in purebred cats may result in decreased disease resistance and environmental adaptability compared to mixed-breed cats, potentially explaining the high prevalence of FCoV infection in purebred cats, including certain breeds. 12 , 13 , 25 , 26

Our findings indicated a markedly lower detection rate and copy number of FCoV in whole blood compared to most tissue samples, which supports the previous findings. 31 Pedersen et al reported that even in cats with highly fulminant experimentally induced FIP, viremia is either absent or falls below the reliable detection limits of highly sensitive RT-qPCR throughout all stages of the infection. 31 Other studies 32 reported on inconsistent FCoV detection in the blood of kittens inoculated with different doses of 2 independent FECV field strains, UCD and RM. In a virus persistence study, cats infected with FCoV type I were all found to be positive for FCoV for at least one of the examined tissues with or without blood viremia. 33 Therefore, efforts for virus detection should focus on tissues and effusions presumably containing FIPV-infected macrophages.

An unexpected and interesting finding in this study was the high detection rate and viral burdens of FCoV in urine and kidney samples. Generally, urine is reported to be an unlikely source of infection. 3 Feline infectious peritonitis virus is strongly cell and tissue bound, with shedding in urine typically occurring only in specific scenarios, such as when lesions disrupt the renal collecting ducts or intestinal wall, leading to the potential shedding of the virus in urine. 3 Urine is more likely diagnosed for abnormalities (proteinuria) in support of a diagnosis if other clinical signs and test results are consistent with FIP. 3 Interestingly, a handful of SARS-CoV-2 studies 34 , 35 have also reported viral shedding in urine and explored its potential correlation with disease severity. The findings of the present study provide compelling evidence to explore the possibility of urine as a convenient and valuable sample for the FIP diagnosis. A correlation between renal involvement and urine positivity needs to be studied. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted to evaluate urine for its diagnostic value in FIP.

Among 14,035 submissions included in this study, multiple types of samples were submitted from 389 individual cats. We additionally analyzed these multiple samples submitted from the same cats, and the results further confirmed the findings from the analysis of the nationwide samples. Significantly higher FCoV detection rates and viral loads were found in peritoneal fluids and urine, compared to the blood when submitted at the same time in multiple sample submissions. One key finding from multiple submissions was the negative correlations in the FCoV detection rates in feces and other types of submitted samples. When FCoV was detected in feces, it was less likely to be detected in other organs and tissues, and vice versa. As fecal detection more likely indicates the shedding of FCoV in cats rather than being connected to ongoing FIP infection, 4 , 9 further studies are warranted to identify the genotypes of FCoV in feces and other types of submitted samples, correlating the results of FIP diagnosis by other methods such as immunohistochemistry.

One significant limitation of this study is the lack of confirmed diagnosis of FIP for the cats from which samples were included, due to the nature of convenience sample submission in this study. However, consistent communication with clinicians during reporting of results indicates strong correlations between replicating mRNA PCR and FIP diagnosis. Another limitation of this study is the detection of the whole population of FCoV via subgenomic mRNA detection that amplified all RNA species with maximum sensitivity and specificity. It is well-known that infection by a specific variant can quickly result in the emergence of genetically diverse clades of coronavirus. 4 , 36 Cats in laboratory settings, when inoculated with a mixture of 2 closely related variants originating from the same FIP-infected cat, exhibited illness caused by either one of the variants, but not both simultaneously. 4 As a result, the RT-qPCR used in our study might be beneficial and valuable to identify quasispecies of virulent FCoV rather than only targeting classical FIPV. In fact, many studies report the identification of diverse FCoV strains in FIP cats. 37 , 38 Nevertheless, the results of the present study should be further confirmed with immunohistochemistry as the gold standard test, and consideration should be given to the clinical presentation of the cats and other tests.

In this study, statistical analyses were performed on the positivity of FCoV in cats of different ages (1 to 17 years old), different sexes, 23 feline breeds, and 14 different types of submitted samples. Ideally, a hierarchical approach for multivariable comparison should be used to analyze the data, taking into account the interactions of different variables. However, given the multiple groups for each variable in this work, we decided to focus on the analysis of individual variables.

In conclusion, this nationwide study sheds new light on the risk factors associated with FIP and the optimal choice of sample submission for its diagnosis. Our findings highlighted that young cats aged 0 to 1 year exhibit a greater likelihood of testing positive for FCoV, potentially due to stressors and immature immune systems. Additionally, similar to COVID-19 in humans, male cats appear to have a higher positivity of FCoV detection, suggesting a gender predisposition. Purebred cats, especially British Shorthairs, show increased susceptibility to FCoV infection, emphasizing the importance of genetic factors. Detection of FCoV in tissues such as peritoneal fluid, urine, kidney, and lymph node proved valuable in our study, potentially aiding in diagnosis. However, limitations such as the lack of confirmed FIP diagnoses and the need for further validation of detection methods underscored the necessity for continued research. Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of FIP epidemiology and underscores the need for improved diagnostic strategies and management approaches.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials are posted online at the journal website: avmajournals.avma.org .

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Laura Huber for her valuable advice on the statistical analysis in this work.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose. No AI-assisted technologies were used in the generation of this manuscript.

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Vennema H , Poland A , Foley J , Pedersen NC . Feline infectious peritonitis viruses arise by mutation from endemic feline enteric coronaviruses . Virology . 1998 ; 243 ( 1 ): 150 - 157 . doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9045

• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hartmann K . Feline infectious peritonitis . Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract . 2005 ; 35 ( 1 ): 39 - 79 . doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2004.10.011

Pedersen NC . A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection: 1963-2008 . J Feline Med Surg . 2009 ; 11 ( 4 ): 225 - 258 . doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.09.008

Pedersen NC , Liu H , Dodd KA , Pesavento PA . Significance of coronavirus mutants in feces and diseased tissues of cats suffering from feline infectious peritonitis . Viruses . 2009 ; 1 ( 2 ): 166 - 184 . doi: 10.3390/v1020166

Pedersen NC . An update on feline infectious peritonitis: virology and immunopathogenesis . Vet J . 2014 ; 201 ( 2 ): 123 - 132 . doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.04.017

Klein-Richers U , Hartmann K , Hofmann-Lehmann R , et al. Prevalence of feline coronavirus shedding in German catteries and associated risk factors . Viruses . 2020 ; 12 ( 9 ): 12 . doi: 10.3390/v12091000

Thayer V , Gogolski S , Felten S , Hartmann K , Kennedy M , Olah GA . 2022 AAFP/EveryCat feline infectious peritonitis diagnosis guidelines . J Feline Med Surg . 2022 ; 24 ( 9 ): 905 - 933 . doi: 10.1177/1098612X221118761 . Published correction appears in J Feline Med Surg . 2022;24(12):e676. doi:10.1177/1098612X221126448

Addie D , Belák S , Boucraut-Baralon C , et al. Feline infectious peritonitis: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management . J Feline Med Surg . 2009 ; 11 ( 7 ): 594 - 604 . doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2009.05.008

Herrewegh AA , de Groot RJ , Cepica A , Egberink HF , Horzinek MC , Rottier PJ . Detection of feline coronavirus RNA in feces, tissues, and body fluids of naturally infected cats by reverse transcriptase PCR . J Clin Microbiol . 1995 ; 33 ( 3 ): 684 - 689 . doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.684-689.1995

Fish EJ , Diniz PPV , Juan YC , et al. Cross-sectional quantitative RT-PCR study of feline coronavirus viremia and replication in peripheral blood of healthy shelter cats in Southern California . J Feline Med Surg . 2018 ; 20 ( 4 ): 295 - 301 . doi: 10.1177/1098612X17705227

Tasker S . Diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis: update on evidence supporting available tests . J Feline Med Surg . 2018 ; 20 ( 3 ): 228 - 243 . doi: 10.1177/1098612X18758592

Benetka V , Kübber-Heiss A , Kolodziejek J , Nowotny N , Hofmann-Parisot M , Möstl K . Prevalence of feline coronavirus types I and II in cats with histopathologically verified feline infectious peritonitis . Vet Microbiol . 2004 ; 99 ( 1 ): 31 - 42 . doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.07.010

Dong B , Zhang X , Zhong X , et al. Prevalence of natural feline coronavirus infection in domestic cats in Fujian, China . Virol J . 2024 ; 21 ( 1 ): 2 . doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02273-y

Foley JE , Poland A , Carlson J , Pedersen NC . Risk factors for feline infectious peritonitis among cats in multiple-cat environments with endemic feline enteric coronavirus . J Am Vet Med Assoc . 1997 ; 210 ( 9 ): 1313 - 1318 . doi: 10.2460/javma.1997.210.09.1313

Barua S , Bailey M , Zhong K , et al. Research Note: role of darkling beetles (Alphitobius diaperinus) and litter in spreading and maintaining Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni in chicken flocks . Poult Sci . 2023 ; 102 ( 11 ): 103061 . doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103061

Simons FA , Vennema H , Rofina JE , et al. A mRNA PCR for the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis . J Virol Methods . 2005 ; 124 ( 1-2 ): 111 - 116 . doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.11.012

Pedersen NC , Allen CE , Lyons LA . Pathogenesis of feline enteric coronavirus infection . J Feline Med Surg . 2008 ; 10 ( 6 ): 529 - 541 . doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.02.006

Pesteanu-Somogyi LD , Radzai C , Pressler BM . Prevalence of feline infectious peritonitis in specific cat breeds . J Feline Med Surg . 2006 ; 8 ( 1 ): 1 - 5 . doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2005.04.003

Drechsler Y , Alcaraz A , Bossong FJ , Collisson EW , Diniz PP . Feline coronavirus in multicat environments . Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract . 2011 ; 41 ( 6 ): 1133 - 1169 . doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.08.004

Pijls BG , Jolani S , Atherley A , et al. Demographic risk factors for COVID-19 infection, severity, ICU admission and death: a meta-analysis of 59 studies . BMJ Open . 2021 ; 11 ( 1 ): e044640 . doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044640

Norris JM , Bosward KL , White JD , Baral RM , Catt MJ , Malik R . Clinicopathological findings associated with feline infectious peritonitis in Sydney, Australia: 42 cases (1990-2002) . Aust Vet J . 2005 ; 83 ( 11 ): 666 - 673 . doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb13044.x

Rohrbach BW , Legendre AM , Baldwin CA , Lein DH , Reed WM , Wilson RB . Epidemiology of feline infectious peritonitis among cats examined at veterinary medical teaching hospitals . J Am Vet Med Assoc . 2001 ; 218 ( 7 ): 1111 - 1115 . doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1111

Riemer F , Kuehner KA , Ritz S , Sauter-Louis C , Hartmann K . Clinical and laboratory features of cats with feline infectious peritonitis—a retrospective study of 231 confirmed cases (2000-2010) . J Feline Med Surg . 2016 ; 18 ( 4 ): 348 - 356 . doi: 10.1177/1098612X15586209

Potkay S , Bacher JD , Pitts TW . Feline infectious peritonitis in a closed breeding colony . Lab Anim Sci . 1974 ; 24 ( 2 ): 279 - 289 .

Pedersen NC , Liu H , Gandolfi B , Lyons LA . The influence of age and genetics on natural resistance to experimentally induced feline infectious peritonitis . Vet Immunol Immunopathol . 2014 ; 162 ( 1-2 ): 33 - 40 . doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.09.001

Coolen RL , Cambier JC , van Asselt E , Blok BFM . Androgen receptors in the forebrain: a study in adult male cats . J Morphol . 2023 ; 284 ( 2 ): e21553 . doi: 10.1002/jmor.21553

Ravi M , Wobeser GA , Taylor SM , Jackson ML . Naturally acquired feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infection in cats from western Canada: prevalence, disease associations, and survival analysis . Can Vet J . 2010 ; 51 ( 3 ): 271 - 276 .

Powers JA , Chiu ES , Kraberger SJ , et al. Feline leukemia virus (FeLV) disease outcomes in a domestic cat breeding colony: relationship to endogenous FeLV and other chronic viral infections . J Virol . 2018 ; 92 ( 18 ): 92 . doi: 10.1128/JVI.00649-18

Flook M , Jackson C , Vasileiou E , et al. Informing the public health response to COVID-19: a systematic review of risk factors for disease, severity, and mortality . BMC Infect Dis . 2021 ; 21 ( 1 ): 342 . doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05992-1

Kharroubi SA , Diab-El-Harake M . Sex-differences in COVID-19 diagnosis, risk factors and disease comorbidities: a large US-based cohort study . Front Public Health . 2022 ; 10 : 1029190 . doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029190

Pedersen NC , Eckstrand C , Liu H , Leutenegger C , Murphy B . Levels of feline infectious peritonitis virus in blood, effusions, and various tissues and the role of lymphopenia in disease outcome following experimental infection . Vet Microbiol . 2015 ; 175 ( 2-4 ): 157 - 166 . doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.10.025

Vogel L , Van der Lubben M , te Lintelo EG , et al. Pathogenic characteristics of persistent feline enteric coronavirus infection in cats . Vet Res . 2010 ; 41 ( 5 ): 71 . doi: 10.1051/vetres/2010043

Meli M , Kipar A , Müller C , et al. High viral loads despite absence of clinical and pathological findings in cats experimentally infected with feline coronavirus (FCoV) type I and in naturally FCoV-infected cats . J Feline Med Surg . 2004 ; 6 ( 2 ): 69 - 81 . doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2003.08.007

Anjos D , Fiaccadori FS , Servian CDP , et al. SARS-CoV-2 loads in urine, sera and stool specimens in association with clinical features of COVID-19 patients . J Clin Virol Plus . 2022 ; 2 ( 1 ): 100059 . doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100059

Roshandel MR , Nateqi M , Lak R , et al. Diagnostic and methodological evaluation of studies on the urinary shedding of SARS-CoV-2, compared to stool and serum: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) . 2020 ; 66 ( 6 ): 148 - 156 . doi: 10.14715/cmb/2020.66.6.26

Battilani M , Coradin T , Scagliarini A , et al. Quasispecies composition and phylogenetic analysis of feline coronaviruses (FCoVs) in naturally infected cats . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol . 2003 ; 39 ( 2 ): 141 - 147 . doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00237-2

Le SJ , Xin GY , Wu WC , Shi M . Genetic diversity and evolution of viruses infecting Felis catus: a global perspective . Viruses . 2023 ; 15 ( 6 ): 15 . doi: 10.3390/v15061338

Zhou Q , Li Y , Huang J , et al. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of feline coronavirus in southwest China from 2017 to 2020 . J Gen Virol . 2021 ; 102 ( 9 ): 102 . doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001654

• Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 110 KB)
• Supplementary Table S2 (PDF 126 KB)
• Supplementary Table S3 (PDF 110 KB)
• Supplementary Table S4 (PDF 111 KB)
• Supplementary Table S5 (PDF 110 KB)

• PubMed Citation
• Article by Subarna Barua
• Article by Shila Sarkar
• Article by Kelly Chenoweth
• Article by Calvin Johnson
• Article by Diane Delmain
• Article by Chengming Wang
• Similar articles in PubMed

Follow JAVMA

Follow AJVR

Follow the AVMA

Subscribe to newsletters

© 2024 American Veterinary Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Powered by KGL PubFactory

• [185.126.86.119]
• 185.126.86.119

Character limit 500 /500